A Reply to David Swartz’s Comment on “The Levels of Critique. Pierre Bourdieu and the Political Potential of Social Theory”
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.6092/issn.1971-8853/10135Abstract
A reply to David Swartz’s comment on the author's “The Levels of Critique. Pierre Bourdieu and the Political Potential of Social Theory”.References
Bourdieu, P. (1989). Social Space and Symbolic Power. Sociological Theory, 7(1), 14–25. https://doi.org/10.2307/202060
Cooper, D. (2014). Everyday Utopias: The Conceptual Life of Promising Spaces. Durham: Duke University Press.
Croce, M. (2015). The Habitus and the Critique of the Present. A Wittgensteinian Reading of Bourdieu’s Social Theory. Sociological Theory, 33(4), 327–346. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735275115617801
Croce, M. (2019). The Levels of Critique. Pierre Bourdieu and the Political Potential of Social Theory. Sociologica, 13(2). https://doi.org/10.6092/issn.1971-8853/9753
Deleuze, G. (1995). Negotiations. New York: Columbia University Press.
Ingold, T. (2011). Being Alive: Essays on Movement, Knowledge and Description. Abingdon: Routledge.
Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the Social. An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Swartz, D. (2019). The Emancipatory Potential of Critical Theory: With Bourdieu and Beyond. Sociologica, 13(3). https://doi.org/10.6092/issn.1971-8853/10134
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2019 Mariano Croce
The copyrights of all the texts on this journal belong to the respective authors without restrictions.
This journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (full legal code).
See also our Open Access Policy.
