From Movement to Institution: The "Global Fact" Summit as a Field-Configuring Event

Lucas Graves; Laurens Lauer

doi:10.6092/issn.1971-8853/11154

Authors

Lucas Graves School of Journalism and Mass Communication, University of Wisconsin–Madison http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2980-7145
Lucas Graves is Associate Professor in the School of Journalism and Mass Communication at the University of Wisconsin–Madison, who studies how news and news organizations are changing in the contemporary media ecosystem. Dr Graves has been at the forefront of research on the fact-checking movement in the United States and around the world. His book Deciding What’s True: The Rise of Political Fact-Checking in American Journalism came out in 2016 from Columbia University Press. His work has appeared in the Columbia Journalism Review, the Nieman Journalism Lab, and The New York Times as well as prominent academic journals. Between 2017 and 2019 Dr Graves was Senior Research Fellow and Acting Head of Research at the Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism at the University of Oxford
Laurens Lauer Institute of Sociology, University Duisburg-Essen http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9550-812X
Laurens Lauer is a researcher with a focus on global and comparative studies of new media phenomena at the Institute of Sociology, University of Duisburg-Essen, Germany. His dissertations focuses on the worldwide spread of political fact-checking initiatives. In this context, he studied six fact-checking organizations in four countries and analyzed their embeddedness in different media-political environments

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.6092/issn.1971-8853/11154

Keywords:

fact-checking, institutional fields, journalism

Abstract

The last decade has seen the rise of a self-described worldwide "movement" of fact-checking groups which specialize in debunking false political claims and other forms of misinformation. This very heterogeneous movement now spans nearly 300 fact-checking outlets in more than eighty countries, led by their own professional organization. This study charts the emergence and development of this transnational institutional sphere with qualitative and quantitative analysis of the annual summit of fact-checking organizations, Global Fact, as a field-configuring event (Lampel & Meyer, 2008). Drawing on ethnographic fieldwork by two authors as well as comprehensive data on the first six Global Fact meetings, we use shifts in the structure and content of the event to explore processes of structuration; we highlight a shift from a field-building ethic valuing inclusiveness and celebrating diversity to one valuing common practices and standards, marked by new governance mechanisms and increasing interest from powerful outside stakeholders. Ultimately, our data show the fact-checking field negotiating a necessary tension between managing internal diversity and consolidating as an increasingly recognized institutional actor in the domain of public communication.

References

Anand, N., & Jones, B. C. (2008). Tournament Rituals, Category Dynamics, and Field Configuration: The Case of the Booker Prize. Journal of Management Studies, 45(6), 1036–1060. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2008.00782.x

Anand, N., & Watson, M. R. (2004). Tournament Rituals in the Evolution of Fields: The Case of the Grammy Awards. Academy of Management Journal, 47(1), 59–80. https://doi.org/10.5465/20159560

Anderson, C. (2018). Apostles of Certainty: Data Journalism and the Politics of Doubt. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Berger, P. L., & Luckmann, T. (1991). The Social Construction of Reality: A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge. London: Penguin Books.

Bourdieu, P. (1996). The Rules of Art: Genesis and Structure of the Literary Field (S. Emanuel, Trans.). London: Polity Press.

Bourdieu, P. (2005). The political field, the social science field, and the journalistic field. In E. Neveu, R. D. Benson (Eds.), Bourdieu and the Journalistic Field (pp. 29–47). Cambridge, Ma: Polity.

Carlson, M. (2016). Metajournalistic Discourse and the Meanings of Journalism: Definitional Control, Boundary Work, and Legitimation. Communication Theory, 26(4), 349–368. https://doi.org/10.1111/comt.12088

DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147–160. https://doi.org/10.2307/2095101

Erik Andriessen, J. H. (2005). Archetypes of Knowledge Communities. In P. Van Den Besselaar, G. De Michelis, J. Preece, & C. Simone (Eds.), Communities and Technologies 2005 (pp. 191–213). Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-3591-8_11

Fligstein, N., & McAdam, D. (2011). Toward a General Theory of Strategic Action Fields. Sociological Theory, 29(1), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9558.2010.01385.x

García-Avilés, J. A. (2014). Online Newsrooms as Communities of Practice: Exploring Digital Journalists’ Applied Ethics. Journal of Mass Media Ethics, 29(4), 258–272. https://doi.org/10.1080/08900523.2014.946600

Girard, M., & Stark, D. (2002). Distributing Intelligence and Organizing Diversity in New-Media Projects. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 34(11), 1927–1949. https://doi.org/10.1068/a34197

Hardy, C., & Maguire, S. (2010). Discourse, Field-Configuring Events, and Change in Organizations and Institutional Fields: Narratives of DDT and the Stockholm Convention. Academy of Management Journal, 53(6), 1365–1392. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2010.57318384

Humprecht, E. (2020). How Do They Debunk “Fake News”? A Cross-National Comparison of Transparency in Fact Checks. Digital Journalism, 8(3), 310–327. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2019.1691031

Kluttz, D. N., & Fligstein, N. (2016). Varieties of Sociological Field Theory. In S. Abrutyn (Ed.), Handbook of Contemporary Sociological Theory (pp. 185–204). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-32250-6_10

Lampel, J., & Meyer, A. D. (2008). Field‐configuring events as structuring mechanisms: How conferences, ceremonies, and trade shows constitute new technologies, industries, and markets. Journal of Management Studies, 45(6), 1025–1035. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2008.00787.x

Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

Lowrey, W. (2017). The Emergence and Development of News Fact-checking Sites. Journalism Studies, 18(3), 376–394. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2015.1052537

Matsaganis, M. D., & Katz, V. S. (2014). How ethnic media producers constitute their communities of practice: An ecological approach. Journalism, 15(7), 926–944. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884913501243

Meltzer, K., & Martik, E. (2017). Journalists as Communities of Practice: Advancing a Theoretical Framework for Understanding Journalism. Journal of Communication Inquiry, 41(3), 207–226. https://doi.org/10.1177/0196859917706158

Powell, W. W., White, D. R., Koput, K. W., & Owen‐Smith, J. (2005). Network Dynamics and Field Evolution: The Growth of Interorganizational Collaboration in the Life Sciences. American Journal of Sociology, 110(4), 1132–1205. https://doi.org/10.1086/421508

Schmidt, T. R. (2019). Rewriting the Newspaper: The Storytelling Movement in American Print Journalism. Columbia: University of Missouri Press.

Schmitz Weiss, A., & Domingo, D. (2010). Innovation processes in online newsrooms as actor-networks and communities of practice. New Media & Society, 12(7), 1156–1171. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444809360400

Schüßler, E., & Sydow, J. (2015). Organizing Events for Configuring and Maintaining Creative Fields. In C. Jones, M. Lorenzen, & J. Sapsed (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Creative Industries (pp. 284–300). Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199603510.013.029

Stark, D. (2009). The Sense of Dissonance: Accounts of Worth in Economic Life. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Stencel, M., & Luther, J. (2020). Annual census finds nearly 300 fact-checking projects around the world. Duke Reporters’ Lab, June 22. https://reporterslab.org/annual-census-finds-nearly-300-fact-checking-projects-around-the-world/

Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press. https://search.library.wisc.edu/catalog/9910886021002121

Wenger, E. (2011). Communities of Practice: A Brief Introduction. Alexandria, Virginia: National Science Foundation (U.S.). https://scholarsbank.uoregon.edu/xmlui/handle/1794/11736

White, H. (1993). Values Come in Styles, Which Mate to Change. In R. Michod, L. Nadel, & M. Hechter (Eds.), The Origin of Values (pp. 63–91). New York: Aldine de Gruyer.

Zelizer, B. (1993). Journalists as interpretive communities. Critical Studies in Mass Communication, 10(3), 219–237. https://doi.org/10.1080/15295039309366865

Zelizer, B. (2009). Journalists as interpretive communities, revisited. In S. Allan (Ed.), The Routledge Companion to News and Journalism (pp. 225–234). London: Routledge.

From Movement to Institution: The "Global Fact" Summit as a Field-Configuring Event

Authors

DOI:

Keywords:

Abstract

References

Downloads

Published

How to Cite

Issue

Section

License

Information

Make a Submission

Current Issue