Pandemic Practices, Part One. How to Turn “Living Through the COVID-19 Pandemic” into a Heuristic Tool for Sociological Theorizing
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.6092/issn.1971-8853/11172Keywords:
COVID-19, Emergent Event, Practice Theory, Pandemic Practices, Practices of ComparingAbstract
This paper uses the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic as an opportunity to engage in an experiment in sociological theorizing. For this purpose, we analyze the pandemic as an unpredictable event emerging before our very eyes. To account for the unpredictability of the event, we propose to think about it in terms of "pandemic practices": social practices that emerge and are being reproduced, connected, disconnected and (de)-institutionalized in the course of the pandemic. We introduce a tentative typology of pandemic practices which highlights what we call "pandemic meta-practices", that is, practices that discuss, compare, and evaluate other pandemic practices. Meta-practices, we argue, shape the likelihood of other pandemic practices to prevail by establishing relationships between them (e.g. by comparing the "management" of the pandemic in different countries). The concluding section explains the heuristic advantages of this approach with a number of research questions that we plan to study in more detail during future phases of the pandemic. Our experimental strategy of theorizing compels us to develop our view further during the event, making this only the first of a series of papers exploring the COVID-19 pandemic.References
Abeysinghe, S. (2013). When the spread of disease becomes a global event: The classification of pandemics. Social Studies of Science, 43 (6), 905–926. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312713492559
Alkemeyer, T., & Buchmann, N. (2016). Praktiken der Subjektivierung. Subjektivierung als Praxis. In H. Schäfer (Ed.), Praxistheorie. Ein soziologisches Forschungsprogramm (pp. 115–136). Bielefeld: transcript. https://doi.org/10.14361/9783839424049-006
Bailey, R. (2020). How will coronavirus pandemic deaths compare to the 1957 flu pandemic? Reason: Free Minds and Markets, March 31. Retrieved from https://reason.com/2020/03/31/how-will-coronavirus-pandemic-deaths-compare-to-the-1957-flu-pandemic/
BBC (2020). Dominic Cummings: What is the scandal about?, May 26. Retrieved from https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-52811168
Brankovic, J., Ringel, L., & Werron, T. (2018). How rankings produce competition: The case of global university rankings. Zeitschrift für Soziologie, 47 (4), 270–288. https://doi.org/10.1515/zfsoz-2018-0118
Burawoy, M. (1997). The extended case method. Sociological Theory, 16 (1), 4–33. https://doi.org/10.1111/0735-2751.00040
Deep Knowledge Group. (2020). COVID-19 Regional Safety Assessment (200 Regions). Retrieved from https://www.dkv.global/covid-safety-assessment-200-regions
Epple, A., & Erhart, W. (Eds.). (2015). Die Welt beobachten. Praktiken des Vergleichens. Frankfurt am Main: Campus.
Epple, A., Erhart, W., & Grave, J. (Eds.). (2020). Practices of Comparing: Ordering and Changing the Worlds. Bielefeld: Bielefeld University Press.
Espeland, W. N., & Sauder, M. (2007). Rankings and reactivity: How public measures recreate social worlds. American Journal of Sociology, 113(1), 1–40. https://doi.org/10.1086/517897
Esposito, E. (2020). Systemic integration and the need for de-integration in pandemic times. Sociologica, 14(1), 3–20. https://doi.org/10.6092/issn.1971-8853/10853
Eyal, G. (2020). Beware the trolley zealots. Sociologica, 14(1), 21–30. https://doi.org/10.6092/issn.1971-8853/10842
Grave, J. (2020). Eine “unvergleichbare Pandemie”? Über die Vergleichskonjunktur in Zeiten der Viruskrise. Die Praktiken des Vergleichens, Practices of Comparing, March 13. Retrieved from https://vergleichen.hypotheses.org/583#more-583
Gunia, A. (2020). “I don’t think we should ever shake hands again”. Dr. Fauci says coronavirus should change some behaviors for good. Time, April 9. Retrieved from https://time.com/5818134/anthony-fauci-never-shake-hands-coronavirus/
Heintz, B. (2010). Numerische Differenz. Überlegungen zu einer Soziologie des (quantitativen) Vergleichs. Zeitschrift für Soziologie, 39(3), 162–181. https://doi.org/10.1515/zfsoz-2010-0301
Heintz, B. (2016). “Wir leben im Zeitalter der Vergleichung”. Perspektiven einer Soziologie des Vergleichs. Zeitschrift für Soziologie, 45(5), 305–323. https://doi.org/10.1515/zfsoz-2015-1018
Heintz, B., & Werron, T. (2011). Wie ist Globalisierung möglich? Zur Entstehung globaler Vergleichshorizonte am Beispiel von Wissenschaft und Sport. Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie, 63(3), 359–394. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11577-011-0142-5
Hillebrandt, F. (2014). Soziologische Praxistheorien: Eine Einführung. Wiesbaden: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-94097-7
Holzer, B. (2020). Ersatzstrukturen. Die Corona-Krise als Gesellschaftsexperiment. Soziopolis, April 28. Retrieved from https://www.soziopolis.de/beobachten/gesellschaft/artikel/der-grosse-austausch/
Lahav, A. (2020). The COVID-19 pandemic as deus-ex-machina on the Israeli Political Stage? The early pandemic speeches of Benjamin Netanyahu. DiscourseNet Collaborative Working Paper Series, 2/5, Special Issue: Discourse Studies Essays on the Corona Crisis. Retrieved from https://discourseanalysis.net/sites/default/files/2020-07/Lahav_2020_DNCWPS_2-5_0.pdf
Lange, A.-C., Lenglet, M., & Seyfert, R. (2019). On studying algorithms ethnographically: Making sense of objects of ignorance. Organization, 26(4), 598–617. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350508418808230
Latour, B. (1987). Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers through Society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Lindeberg, R. (2020). Man behind Sweden’s controversial virus strategy admits mistakes. Bloomberg, June 3. Retrieved from https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2020-06-03/man-behind-sweden-s-virus-strategy-says-he-got-some-things-wrong
Lopes, S. L. C., & Queiroz, P. H. S. (2020). Disrupting the media discourse: An analysis of the announcement of the Brazilian Media Consortium during the COVID-19 pandemic. DiscourseNet Collaborative Working Paper Series, 2/3, Special Issue: Discourse Studies Essays on the Corona Crisis. Retrieved from https://discourseanalysis.net/sites/default/files/2020-07/Lopes-Queiroz_2020_DNCWPS_2-3.pdf
Loscher, G., Splitter, V., & Seidl, D. (2019). Theodore Schatzki’s theory and its implications for organization studies. In S. Clegg, & M. Pina e Cunha (Eds.), Management, Organizations and Contemporary Social Theory (pp. 115–134). New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429279591
Maesse, J. (2020). “New normality”: The political unconscious of corona discourse and global rearrangements. DiscourseNet Collaborative Working Paper Series, 2/1, Special Issue: Discourse Studies Essays on the Corona Crisis. Retrieved from https://discourseanalysis.net/sites/default/files/2020-06/Maesse_2020_DNCWPS_2-1_2.pdf
Mennicken, A., & Espeland, W. (2019). What’s new with numbers? Sociological approaches to the study of quantification. Annual Review of Sociology, 45(1), 223–245. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-soc-073117-041343
Meyer, M. (2020). Biohackers tackle the coronavirus. Public Understanding of Science Blog. Retrieved from https://sagepus.blogspot.com/2020/03/biohackers-tackle-coronavirus.html
MSNBC (2020). 32 Countries Are Beating Coronavirus. The U.S. Isn't One. |All In| MSNBC [Video]. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aeT02XSCqoo
Müller, T., Ringel, L., & Werron T. (2020). In der Mitte liegt die Kraft: Eine praxistheoretische Perspektive auf die “Mesoebene”. Working Paper Series SFB 1288, 8. https://doi.org/10.4119/unibi/2945010
Nicoletta, G. C. (2020). The clash of technocracies. The pandemic’s episteme of the Italian Red Zone. Discourse-Net Collaborative Working Paper Series, 2/2, Special Issue: Discourse Studies Essays on the Corona Crisis. https://discourseanalysis.net/sites/default/files/2020-06/Nicoletta_2020_DNCWPS_2-2.pdf
Nicolini, D. (2009). Zooming in and out: Studying practices by switching theoretical lenses and trailing connections. Organization Studies, 30(12), 1391–1418. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840609349875
Nicolini, D. (2016). Is small the only beautiful? Making sense of “large phenomena” from a practice-based perspective. In A. Hui, T. Schatzki, & E. Shove (Eds.), The Nexus of Practices: Connections, Constellations and Practitioners (pp. 98–113). London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315560816
Opitz, S. (2017). The digital enactment of pandemics as a mode of global self-observation. European Journal of Social Theory, 20(3), 392–416. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368431016671141
Reckwitz, A. (2002). Toward a theory of social practices. a development in culturalist theorizing. European Journal of Social Theory, 5(2), 245–265. https://doi.org/10.1177/13684310222225432
Rhodes, T. & Lancaster, K. (2020) Mathematical models as public troubles in COVID-19 infection control: Following the numbers. Health Sociology Review, 29(2), 177–194. https://doi.org/10.1080/14461242.2020.1764376
Ringel, L., Brankovic, J., & Werron, T. (2020). The organizational engine of rankings: Connecting “new” and “old” institutionalism. Politics & Governance, Special Issue Quantification in Higher Education, 8(2), 36–47. http://dx.doi.org/10.17645/pag.v8i2.2576
Ringel, L., & Werron, T. (2020). Where do rankings come from? A historical-sociological perspective on the history of modern rankings. In A. Epple, W. Erhart, & J. Grave (Eds.), Practices of comparing: Ordering and changing the worlds (pp. 137–170). Bielefeld: Bielefeld University Press. https://doi.org/10.14361/9783839451663
Roll, K., & Ventresca, M. (2020). Lecturer and student relationships matter even more online than on campus. The Guardian, June 8. Retrieved from https://www.theguardian.com/education/2020/jun/08/lecturer-and-student-relationships-matter-even-more-online-than-on-campus
Romania, V. (2020). Interactional anomie? Imaging social distance after COVID-19: A Goffmanian perspective. Sociologica, 14(1), 51–66. https://doi.org/10.6092/issn.1971-8853/10836
Schaeffer, K. (2020). A look at the Americans who believe there is some truth to the conspiracy theory that COVID-19 was planned. Fact Tank, July 24. Pew Research Center. Retrieved from https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2020/07/24/a-look-at-the-americans-who-believe-there-is-some-truth-to-the-conspiracy-theory-that-covid-19-was-planned
Schäfer, H. (2013). Die Instabilität der Praxis. Reproduktion und Transformation des Sozialen in der Praxistheorie. Weilerswist: Velbrück.
Schatzki, T. R. (2005). Peripheral vision: The sites of organizations. Organization Studies, 26(3), 465–484. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840605050876
Schatzki, T. R., Knorr-Cetina, K., & von Savigny, E. (Eds.). (2001). The Practice Turn in Contemporary Theory. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203977453
Schmidt, R. (2016). Theoretisieren. Fragen und Überlegungen zu einem konzeptionellen und empirischen Desiderat der Soziologie der Praktiken. In H. Schäfer (Ed.), Praxistheorie. Ein soziologisches Forschungsprogramm (pp. 245–1263). Bielefeld: transcript. https://doi.org/10.14361/9783839424049-012
Schmidt, R., & Volbers, J. (2011). Öffentlichkeit als methodologisches Prinzip. Zur Tragweite einer praxis-theoretischen Grundannahme. Zeitschrift für Soziologie, 40(1), 24–41. https://doi.org/10.1515/zfsoz-2011-0102
Sewell, W. H. (1996). Historical events as transformations of structures: Inventing revolution at the Bastille. Theory and Society, 25(6), 841–881. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00159818
Snow, D., Rochford, E., Worden, S., & Benford, R. (1986). Frame alignment processes, micromobilization, and movement participation. American Sociological Review, 51(4), 464–481. https://doi.org/10.2307/2095581
Stark, D. (2020). Testing and being tested in pandemic times. Sociologica, 14(1), 67–94. https://doi.org/10.6092/issn.1971-8853/10931
Steinmetz, W. (2019) (Ed.). The Force of Comparison. A New Perspective on Modern European History and the Contemporary World. New York, NY: Berghahn.
Stichweh, R. (2020). Simplifikation des Sozialen. Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung, April 7. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/340477214_Simplifikation_des_Sozialen_Die_Corona-Pandemie_und_die_Funktionssysteme_der_Weltgesellschaft
Strang, D., & Meyer, J. (1993). Institutional conditions for diffusion. Theory and Society, 22(4), 487–511. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00993595
Wakefield, J. (2020). How Bill Gates became the voodoo doll of Covid conspiracies. BBC, June 6. Retrieved from https://www.bbc.com/news/technology-52833706
Werron, T. (2014). On public forms of competition. Cultural Studies < – > Critical Methodologies, 14(1), 62–76. https://doi.org/10.1177/1532708613507891
Werron, T. (2020). Global publics as catalysts of global competition: A sociological view. In V. Huber, & J. Osterhammel (Eds.), Global Publics. Their Power and Their Limits, 1870–1990 (pp. 343–366). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Werron, T., & Ringel, L. (2017). Rankings in a comparative perspective: Conceptual remarks. In S. Lessenich (Ed.), Geschlossene Gesellschaften: Verhandlungen des 38. Kongresses der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Soziologie (pp. 1–10). Essen: DGS.
Wood, S. (2019). Academic conferences generated £1.9bn spend, says new data. Conference News, January 14. Retrieved from https://www.conference-news.co.uk/news/academic-conferences-generated-ps19bn-spend-says-new-data
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 Tobias Werron, Leopold Ringel
The copyrights of all the texts on this journal belong to the respective authors without restrictions.
This journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (full legal code).
See also our Open Access Policy.
