Theories of Creativity: The Significance of the Insignificant. Research Note: Methodological Reflections behind the Scenes


  • Benjamin Schiemer Institute of Organization Science, Johannes Kepler University, Linz
  • Roman Duffner Institute of Theory and History, Anton Bruckner Private University, Linz; Institute of Organization Science, Johannes Kepler University, Linz
  • S.R. Ayers



Graphic Novel, Visual Communication, Science Communication, Methodology, Behind-the-Scenes


In this research note we describe the development process of the graphic novel The Significance of the Insignificant. We provide insights behind the scenes and show the making of decisions on selected problems and their solutions, which accompanied the process of translating creativity theory into a graphic novel. The decisions include the choice of setting, genre, characters, and their appearance, as well as the entire storyline. We conclude the research note by considering methodological issues associated with translating science into a graphic novel.


Amabile, T.M. (1983). The Social Psychology of Creativity: A Componential Conceptualization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45(2), 357–376.

Amabile, T.M. (1993). Motivational Synergy: Toward New Conceptualizations of Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivation in the Workplace. Human Resource Management Review, 3(3), 185–201.

Amabile, T.M., Conti, R., Coon, H., Lazenby, J., & Herron, M. (1996). Assessing the Work Environment for Creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 39(5), 1154–1184.

Burt, R.S. (2002). The Social Capital of Structural Holes. The New Economic Sociology: Developments in an Emerging Field, 148(90), 122.

Chesbrough, H., Vanhaverbeke, W., & West, J. (Eds.). (2006). Open Innovation: Researching a New Paradigm. Oxford University Press on Demand.

Cohendet, P., Llerena, P., & Simon, L. (2010). The Innovative Firm: Nexus of Communities and Creativity. Revue d'économie industrielle, 129–130, 139–170.

Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1996). Flow and the Psychology of Discovery and Invention(Vol. 56). New York, USA: Harper Collins.

Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1997). Flow and Creativity. Namta Journal, 22(2), 60–97. doi: EJ547968.

Duffner, L.R. (2020). Push Button. In T. Beyes, R. Holt, & C. Pias, (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Media, Technology, and Organization Studies(pp. 356–367). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

Ettlie, J.E., Bridges, W.P., & O’keefe, R.D. (1984). Organization Strategy and Structural Differences for Radical versus Incremental Innovation. Management Science, 30(6), 682–695.

Florida, R. (2005). Cities and the Creative Class. New York, USA: Routledge.

Garud, R., Gehman, J., & Kumaraswamy, A. (2011). Complexity Arrangements for Sustained Innovation: Lessons from 3M Corporation. Organization Studies, 32(6), 737–767.

Garud, R., Gehman, J., Kumaraswamy, A., & Tuertscher, P. (2016). From the Process of Innovation to Innovation as Process. In A. Langley, & H. Tsoukas (Eds.), The SAGE Handbook of Process Organization Studies(pp. 451–466). London, UK: Sage Publications.

Glăveanu, V.P. (2012). What Can Be Done with an Egg? Creativity, Material Objects, and the Theory of Affordances. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 46(3), 192–208.

Granovetter, M.S. (1973). The Strength of Weak Ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78(6), 1360–1380.

Guilford, J.P. (1950). Creativity. American Psychologist, 5(9), 444–454.

Hargadon, A.B., & Bechky, B.A. (2006). When Collections of Creatives Become Creative Collectives: A Field Study of Problem Solving at Work. Organization Science, 17(4), 484–500.

Hargadon, A.B., & Douglas, Y. (2001). When Innovations Meet Institutions: Edison and the Design of the Electric Light. Administrative Science Quarterly, 46(3), 476–501.

Harvey, S., & Kou, C.Y. (2013). Collective Engagement in Creative Tasks: The Role of Evaluation in the Creative Process in Groups. Administrative Science Quarterly, 58(3), 346–386.

Hutter, M., & Farías, I. (2017). Sourcing Newness: Ways of Inducing Indeterminacy. Journal of Cultural Economy, 10(5), 434–449.

Joas, H. (1996). The Creativity of Action. Chicago, MA: University of Chicago Press.

Knorr-Cetina, K. (2005). Objectual Practice. In K. Knorr-Cetina, T.R. Schatzki, & E. von Savigny (Eds.), The Practice Turn in Contemporary Theory(pp. 175–188).New York, USA: Routledge.

Koestler, A. (1964). The Act of Creation. London, UK: Arkana Penguin.

Lingo, E.L., & O’Mahony, S. (2010). Nexus Work: Brokerage on Creative Projects. Administrative Science Quarterly, 55(1), 47–81.

Masaaki, I. (1986). Kaizen: The Key to Japan’s Competitive Success. New York, USA: McGraw-Hill.

Mason, J.H. (2003). The Value of Creativity: The Origins and Emergence of a Modern Belief. Farnham, UK: Ashgate.

Ortmann, G., & Sydow, J. (2018). Dancing in Chains: Creative Practices in/of Organizations. Organization Studies, 39(7), 899–921.

Paulus, P.B., & Nijstad, B.A. (Eds.). (2003). Group Creativity: Innovation through Collaboration. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

Perry-Smith, J.E. (2014). Social Network Ties beyond Nonredundancy: An Experimental Investigation of the Effect of Knowledge Content and Tie Strength on Creativity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 99(5), 831–846.

Reckwitz, A. (2017). The Invention of Creativity: Modern Society and the Culture of the New. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Polity Press.

Rosso, B.D. (2014). Creativity and Constraints: Exploring the Role of Constraints in the Creative Processes of Research and Development Teams. Organization Studies, 35(4), 551–585.

Runco, M.A., & Acar, S. (2012). Divergent Thinking as an Indicator of Creative Potential. Creativity Research Journal, 24(1), 66–75.

Runco, M.A., & Jaeger, G.J. (2012). The Standard Definition of Creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 24(1), 92–96.

Sawyer, R.K. (2006). Explaining Creativity: The Science of Human Innovation. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

Schiemer, B., Schüßler, E., & Grabher, G. (2019). Collaborative Innovation Online: Entanglements of the Making of Content, Skills, and Community on a Songwriting Platform. In J. Sydow, & H. Berends (Eds.), Managing Inter-organizational Collaborations: Process Views, Research in the Sociology of Organizations, Vol. 64 (pp. 293–316). Bingley, UK: Emerald Publishing Limited.

Schiemer, B. (2021). It’s About What Happens in the Meantime. Temporal Affordances in Creative Work. Under Review.

Schumpeter, J. (1942). Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Sonenshein, S. (2016). Routines and Creativity: From Dualism to Duality. Organization Science, 27(3), 739–758.

Tanggaard, L. (2013). The Sociomateriality of Creativity in Everyday Life. Culture & Psychology, 19(1), 20–32.

Taylor, F.W. (1911). The Principles of Scientific Management. New York, USA: Harper & Brothers.

Uzzi, B., & Spiro, J. (2005). Collaboration and Creativity: The Small World Problem. American Journal of Sociology, 111(2), 447–504.

Vedres, B., & Stark, D. (2010). Structural Folds: Generative Disruption in Overlapping Groups. American Journal of Sociology, 115(4), 1150–1190.

Zhou, J., & Shalley, C.E. (Eds.). (2007). Handbook of Organizational Creativity. London: Taylor & Francis.




How to Cite

Schiemer, B., Duffner, R., & Ayers, S. (2021). Theories of Creativity: The Significance of the Insignificant. Research Note: Methodological Reflections behind the Scenes. Sociologica, 15(1), 193-210.



Re-formats: Envisioning Sociology