Polanyi, Callon, and Amazon: Institutionalist, ANT, and DRAN Approaches to Platform Economies
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.6092/issn.1971-8853/11748Keywords:
Platform, Marketization, Economization, ANT, PolanyiAbstract
Drawing on a detailed analysis of Grabher and König’s study of platformization (Grabher & König, 2020), this essay develops a revision of Actor-Network Theory by proposing how a Device, Representation, Actor and Network or a DRAN Approach can be more helpful in making sense of platform economic processes. First, it locates the ways in which Grabher & König’s article approach platforms from an updated Polanyian perspective. Second, it elaborates on how the aforementioned article critiques static Polanyian perspectives while at the same time building a double tension by a) not being clear whether we observe "the platform economy" as an object or platform economization as a process, and b) not paying sufficient attention to how platforms that draw on intangible materialities move beyond being mere marketization relations. Third, it presents how to address these tensions by drawing on novel theoretical advances of DRAN Approaches and fresh empirical research concerning platform economies, located at the intersection between computer science and social sciences. Proposing a possibility to integrate historical and contemporary studies of economic processes, the essay ends by elaborating on how Grabher & König’s article has a potential to enable a multi-perspective dynamic research strategy in making sense of not only the contemporary working of platforms, but their historical and socio-technical condition of possibility.
References
Andreessen, M. (2007). Analyzing the Facebook Platform, Three Weeks in. PMARCA. http://web.archive.org/web/20071021003047/blog.pmarca.com/2007/06/analyzing_the_f.html
Barrey, S., Cochoy, F., & Dubuisson-Quellier, S. (2000). Designer, packager et merchandiser: trois professionnels pour une même scène marchande. Sociologie du Travail, 42(3), 457–482. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0038-0296(00)01089-X)
Blok, A., Farias, I., & Roberts, C. (Eds.) (2020). The Routledge Companion to Actor-Network Theory. New York: Routledge.
Bogost, I., & Montfort, N. (2009). Platform Studies: Frequently Questioned Answers. In DAC ’09 – Digital Arts and Culture 2009. eScholarship University of California. https://escholarship.org/uc/item/01r0k9br
Caliskan, K. (2020a). Data Money: The Socio-Technical Infrastructure of Cryptocurrency Blockchains. Economy and Society, 49(4), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/03085147.2020.1774258
Caliskan, K. (2020b). Platform Works as Stack Economization: Cryptocurrency Markets and Exchanges in Perspective. Sociologica, 14(3), 115–142. https://doi.org/10.6092/issn.1971-8853/11746
Caliskan, K., & Callon, M. (2009). Economization, Part 1: Shifting Attention from the Economy Towards Processes of Economization. Economy and Society, 38(3), 369–398. https://doi.org/10.1080/03085140903020580
Caliskan, K., & Callon, M. (2010). Economization, Part 2: A Research Programme for the Study of Markets. Economy and Society, 39(1), 1–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/03085140903424519
Callon, M. (1986). The Sociology of an Actor-Network: The Case of the Electric Vehicle. In M. Callon, J. Law, & A. Rip (Eds.), Mapping the Dynamics of Science and Technology (pp. 19–34). London: Macmillan.
Callon, M. (1998). The Laws of the Markets. Malden: Blackwell.
Callon, M. (1999). Actor-Network Theory – The Market Test. The Sociological Review, 47(1_suppl), 181–195. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-954X.1999.tb03488.x
Callon, M., Millo, Y., & Muniesa, F. (Eds.) (2007). Market Devices. Malden: Blackwell.
Dourish, P. (2016). Algorithms and Their Others: Algorithmic Culture in Context. Big Data & Society, 3(2), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F2053951716665128
Dourish, P. (2017). The Stuff of Bits: An Essay on the Materialities of Information. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
Finch, J., Horan, C., & Reid, E. (2015). The Performativity of Sustainability: Making a Conduit a Marketing Device. Journal of Marketing Management, 31(1-2), 167–192. https://doi.org/10.1080/0267257X.2014.980752
Foucault, M. (1986). La gouvernementalité. Actes - Les cahiers d’action juridique, 54, 6–16.
Foucault, M. (1980). Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings 1972–1977 (Edited by C. Gordon). New York: Pantheon Books.
Glass, M.R., & Rose-Redwood, R. (Eds.) (2014). Performativity, Politics, and the Production of Social Space. New York: Routledge.
Grabher, G., & König, J. (2017). Performing Network Theory? Reflexive Relationship Management on Social Network Sites. In B. Hollstein, W. Matiaske, & K. Schnapp (Eds.), Networked Governance: New Research Perspectives (pp. 121–140). Cham: Springer.
Grabher, G., & König, J. (2020). Disruption, Embedded. A Polanyian Framing of the Platform Economy. Sociologica, 14(1), 95–118. https://doi.org/10.6092/issn.1971-8853/10443
Grabher, G., & van Tuijl, E. (2020). Uber-Production: From Global Networks to Digital Platforms. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 52(5), 1005–1016. https://doi.org/10.1177/0308518x20916507
Hawkins, G. (2012). The Performativity of Food Packaging: Market Devices, Waste Crisis and Recycling. The Sociological Review, 60(2_suppl), 66–83. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-954X.12038
Hecht, G. (2002). Rupture-Talk in the Nuclear Age: Conjugating Colonial Power in Africa. Social Studies of Science, 32(5–6), 691–727. https://doi.org/10.1177/030631270203200504
Latour, B. (1996). On Actor-Network Theory: A Few Clarifications. Soziale Welt, 47(4), 369–381. https://doi.org/10.22394/0869-5377-2017-1-173-197
Latour, B. (1999). Pandora’s Hope: Essays on the Reality of Science Studies. Cambridge (MA): Harvard University Press.
Law, J. (1992). Notes on the Theory of the Actor-Network: Ordering, Strategy, and Heterogeneity. Systems Practice, 5(4), 379–393. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01059830
Lépinay, V.A. (2007). Decoding Finance: Articulation and Liquidity Around a Trading Room. In D. MacKenzie, F. Muniesa, & L. Siu (Eds.), Do Economists Make Markets? On the Performativity of Economics (pp. 87–127). Princeton: Princeton University Press.
MacKenzie, D. (2004). The Big, Bad Wolf and the Rational Market: Portfolio Insurance, the 1987 Crash and the Performativity of Economics. Economy and Society, 33(3), 303–334. https://doi.org/10.1080/0308514042000225680
Mason, K., Kjellberg, H., & Hagberg, J. (2015). Exploring the Performativity of Marketing: Theories, Practices and Devices. Journal of Marketing Management, 31(1-2), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/0267257X.2014.982932
McFall, L. (2009). Devices and Desires: How Useful Is the “New” New Economic Sociology for Understanding Market Attachment? Sociology Compass, 3(2), 267–282. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9020.2009.00195.x
Mitchell, S. (2020). Don’t Let Amazon Get Any Bigger. The New York Times, 8 October, 2020. https://www.nytimes.com/2020/10/08/opinion/amazon-antitrust.html
Neyland, D. (2016). Bearing Account-able Witness to the Ethical Algorithmic System. Science, Technology & Human Values, 41(1), 50–76. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243915598056
Olofsson, A., & Zinn, J.O. (Eds.) (2019). Researching Risk and Uncertainty: Methodologies, Methods and Research Strategies. Cham: Palgrave MacMillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-95852-1
Polanyi, K. (1957). The Great Transformation. Boston: Beacon Press.
Rochet, J., & Tirole, J. (2003). Platform Competition in Two-Sided Markets. Journal of the European Economic Association, 1(4), 990–1029. https://doi.org/10.1162/154247603322493212
Roscoe, P. (2015). “Elephants Can’t Gallop”: Performativity, Knowledge and Power in the Market for Lay-Investing. Journal of Marketing Management, 31(1–2), 193–218. https://doi.org/10.1080/0267257X.2014.976584
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Koray Caliskan
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
