Revisions as a Complex Intellectual Journey

Authors

  • Amalya L. Oliver Department of Sociology and Anthropology, Hebrew University of Jerusalem https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1394-2753

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.6092/issn.1971-8853/14600

Keywords:

Revisions, Editors, Reviewers, Learning

Abstract

Revisions can be characterized as a return journey into our research. They can be initiated by our sense of dissatisfaction with the existing text or be a response to reviewers' requests for changes and modifications. In any event, they are a complex task that needs to be handled with the right cognitive and mental frame.

References

Bornmann, L. (2008). Scientific Peer Review: An Analysis of the Peer Review Process from the Perspective of Sociology of Science Theories. Human Architecture: Journal of the Sociology of Self-Knowledge, 6(2), 23–38.

Espeland, W. (2019). What’s Good Enough? Sociologica, 13(1), 13-16. https://doi.org/10.6092/issn.1971-8853/9380

Gove, W. R. (1979). The Review Process and Its Consequences in the Major Sociology Journals. Contemporary Sociology, 8(November), 799–804. https://doi.org/10.2307/2064432

Teplitskiy, M., Acuna, D., Elamrani-Raoult, A., Körding, K., & Evans, J. (2018). The Sociology of Scientific Validity: How Professional Networks Shape Judgment in Peer Review. Research Policy, 47(9), 1825–1841. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2018.06.014

Downloads

Published

2022-05-19

How to Cite

Oliver, A. L. (2022). Revisions as a Complex Intellectual Journey . Sociologica, 16(1), 23–27. https://doi.org/10.6092/issn.1971-8853/14600

Issue

Vol. 16 No. 1 (2022)

Section

Symposium

License

Copyright (c) 2022 Amalya L. Oliver

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.