Can Baboons Save Wall Street? Response to Comments on Taking the Floor

Authors

  • Daniel Beunza Bayes Business School, City, University of London https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0164-7095

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.6092/issn.1971-8853/14773

Keywords:

Management, Baboon Sociology, Actor-Network Theory, Materiality, Finance

Abstract

My response to the Comments on Taking the Floor underscores the book’s call for a balanced consideration of the social and material in the study of markets, as well as for an organizational — and not simply material, or structural — engagement with them. This form of “baboon sociology” sheds light on how market participants deal with devices that prove unfair, destabilizing, or simply inadequate to the market, and is particularly useful at a time when the dark side of information technology has become readily apparent.

References

Callon, M. (2008). Economic Markets and the Rise of Interactive Agencements: From Prosthetic Agencies to Habilitated agencies. In T.J. Pinch & R. Swedberg (Eds.), Living in a Material World: Economic Sociology Meets Science and Technology Studies (pp. 29–56). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Carruthers, B.G. (2013). From Uncertainty toward Risk: The Case of Credit Ratings. Socio-Economic Review, 11(3), 525–551. https://doi.org/10.1093/ser/mws027

Chen, K.K. (2022). The Making of Organizational Researchers. Commentary on Daniel Beunza’s Taking the Floor. Sociologica, 16(1), 75–79. https://doi.org/10.6092/issn.1971-8853/14740

Dudley, W. (2014). Enhancing Financial Stability by Improving Culture in the Financial Services Industry (Speech 147). Federal Reserve Bank of New York. https://ideas.repec.org/p/fip/fednsp/147.html

Fligstein, N. (2021). The Banks Did It: An Anatomy of the Financial Crisis. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Latour, B. (2007). Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

MacKenzie, D. (2003). Long-Term Capital Management and the Sociology of Arbitrage. Economy and Society, 32(3), 349–380. https://doi.org/10.1080/03085140303130

MacKenzie, D. (2011). The Credit Crisis as a Problem in the Sociology of Knowledge. American Journal of Sociology, 116(6), 1778–1841. https://doi.org/10.1086/659639

MacKenzie, D. (2021). Trading at the Speed of Light. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

MacKenzie, D. (2022). Baboon Sociology? Commentary on Daniel Beunza’s Taking the Floor. Sociologica, 16(1), 71–74. https://doi.org/10.6092/issn.1971-8853/14724

MacKenzie, D., & Spears, T. (2014). “The Formula That Killed Wall Street”: The Gaussian Copula and Modeling Practices in Investment Banking. Social Studies of Science, 44(3), 393–417. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312713517157

Ossandón, J. (2022). What Does Taking the Floor Do? Commentary on Daniel Beunza’s Taking the Floor. Sociologica, 16(1), 81–86. https://doi.org/10.6092/issn.1971-8853/14706

Ossandón, J., & Pallesen, T. (2016). Testing the Provoked Economy. Journal of Cultural Economy, 9(3), 310–315. https://doi.org/10.1080/17530350.2015.1096811

Power, M. (2009). The Risk Management of Nothing. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 34(6–7), 849–855. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2009.06.001

Strum, S. & Latour, B. (1987). The Meanings of the Social. Information sur les sciences sociales, 26(4), 783–802.

Tett, G. (2009). Fool's Gold: How Unrestrained Greed Corrupted a Dream, Shattered Global Markets and Unleashed a Catastrophe. London: Hachette.

Zuboff, S. (2015). Big Other: Surveillance Capitalism and the Prospects of an Information Civilization. Journal of Information Technology, 30(1), 75–89. https://doi.org/10.1057/jit.2015.5

Downloads

Published

2022-05-19

How to Cite

Beunza, D. (2022). Can Baboons Save Wall Street? Response to Comments on Taking the Floor. Sociologica, 16(1), 89–94. https://doi.org/10.6092/issn.1971-8853/14773

Issue

Section

Debate