Social Media Outrage against Fake COVID Tests: Decoding an Instance of Flash Activism in Bangladesh
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.6092/issn.1971-8853/16960Keywords:
social media, flash activism, Bangladesh, COVID-19, corruption, authoritarianismAbstract
In this paper, we attempt to outline and to discuss how social media platforms provide the public a space, albeit unsafe, in quasi-authoritarian contexts to share their opinions and grievances on contentious issues. We focus on the case study of a short-lived yet intense wave of social media outrage against a corrupt actor, Shahed, in Bangladesh, who was accused of selling fake Covid-19 tests to the public. Identifying it as an instance of flash activism in the digitally-networked media arena, the paper brings out some of the characteristics that define this act of public outrage under increasing government surveillance, such as the brief duration of the protests, the public indignation that resulted in the online expressions of the outrage and users’ strategies such as employing humour and satire to express indignation and avoid being persecuted by the regime. Our aim with this short paper is to understand how the internet challenges authoritarian governments insofar as it gives voice to citizens to express grievance, how governments transform their legal repertoire to gag their population from voicing opinions, and how people still find new, innovative ways to express themselves under such regimes.
References
Abdullah, M. (2020). ACC Launches Probe Against Regent Hospital Owner Shahed. Dhaka Tribune, July 13. https://www.dhakatribune.com/bangladesh/corruption/2020/07/13/acc-launches-probe-against-regent-hospital-owner-shahed
Al-Zaman, S. (2020). Healthcare Crisis in Bangladesh During the COVID-19 Pandemic. American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, 103(4), 1357–1359. https://doi.org/10.4269/ajtmh.20-0826
Bauhr, M., & Grimes, M. (2013). Indignation or Resignation: The Implications of Transparency for Societal Accountability. Governance, 27(2), 291–320. https://doi.org/10.1111/gove.12033
Bennett, L., & Segerberg, A. (2012). The Logic of Connective Action: The Personalization of Contentious Politics. Information, Communication & Society, 15(5), 739–768. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2012.670661
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2022). Thematic Analysis: A Practical Guide. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Breindl, Y. (2010). Critique of the Democratic Potentials of the Internet: A Review of Current Theory and Practice. TripleC, 8(1), 43–59. https://doi.org/10.31269/triplec.v8i1.159
Chakraborty, A., & Mattoni, A. (in press). Addressing Corruption Through Visual Tools in India: The Case of Three Civil Society Initiatives and Their Facebook Pages. Visual Studies. https://doi.org/10.1080/1472586X.2023.2239759
Earl, J., & Kimport, K. (2011). Digitally Enabled Social Change: Activism in the Internet Age. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Earl, J., Hunt, J., Garrett, K., & Dal, A. (2014). New Technologies and Social Movements. In D. della Porta & M. Diani (Eds.), Oxford Handbook of Social Movements (pp. 355–366). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Earl, J. (2016). Protest Online: Theorizing the Consequences of Online Engagement. In L. Bosi, M. Giugni, & K. Uba (Eds.), The Consequences of Social Movements (pp. 363–400). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Eltantawy, N., & Wiest, J.B. (2011). Social Media in the Egyptian Revolution: Reconsidering Resource Mobilization Theory. International Journal of Communication, 5, 1207–1224. https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/1242
Ferdinand, P. (2000). The Internet, Democracy and Democratization. Democratization, 7(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/13510340008403642
Freedom House. (2019a). Freedom in the World: Bangladesh. https://freedomhouse.org/country/bangladesh/freedom-world/2019
Freedom House. (2019b). Freedom on the Net: Bangladesh. https://freedomhouse.org/country/bangladesh/freedom-net/2019
Freedom House. (2020). Freedom in the World: Bangladesh. https://freedomhouse.org/country/bangladesh/freedom-world/2020
Freedom House. (2022). Freedom on the Net: Bangladesh. https://freedomhouse.org/country/bangladesh/freedom-net/2022
Harindranath, R., & Khorana, S. (2014). Civil Society Movements and the Twittering Classes in the Postcolony: An Indian Case Study. South Asia: Journal of South Asia Studies, 37(1), 60–71. https://doi.org/10.1080/00856401.2012.744285
Human Rights Watch. (2020). International Community: Stand against Authoritarian Rule in Bangladesh, December 10. https://www.hrw.org/news/2020/12/10/international-community-stand-against-authoritarian-rule-bangladesh
Lal, A. (2017). India Social: How Social Media is Leading the Charge and Changing the Country. New Delhi: Hachette India.
Liller, S. (2023). Using Innovation and Technology for Gender Equality, March 7. UNDP. https://www.undp.org/bangladesh/blog/using-innovation-and-technology-gender-equality
Maswood, M.H. (2020). COVID-19 Exposes Deep-Rooted Corruption in Bangladesh Health Sector in Six Months, September 7. New Age Bangladesh. https://www.newagebd.net/article/115657/covid-19-exposes-deep-rooted-corruption-in-bangladesh-health-sector-in-six-months
Noam, E.M. (2005). Why the Internet is Bad for Democracy. Communications of the ACM, 48(10), 57–58. https://doi.org/10.1145/1089107.1089138
Prothom Alo (2022). IEDA Marks Bangladesh as Authoritarian Regime, November 30. https://en.prothomalo.com/bangladesh/mz3xj2ni1f
Rahman, K. (2019). Bangladesh: Overview of Corruption and Anti-Corruption Efforts. U4 Helpdesk, February 14. https://www.u4.no/publications/overview-of-corruption-and-anti-corruption-in-bangladesh-2019
Roy, R.K. (2019). Online Activism, Social Movements and Mediated Politics in Contemporary Bangladesh. Society and Culture in South Asia, 5(2), 193–215. https://doi.org/10.1177/2393861719836296
Sabur, S. (2013). Post Card from Shahabag. ISA eSymposium for Sociology. Retrieved July 11, 2023 from https://www.isa-sociology.org/uploads/files/EBul-Sabur-March2012.pdf
Sorour, M.K., & Dey, B. (2014). Energising the Political Movements in Developing Countries: The Role of Social Media. Capital & Class, 38(3), 508–515. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309816814550390
Sinpeng, A. (2021). Hashtag Activism: Social Media and the #FreeYouth Protests in Thailand, Critical Asian Studies, 53(2), 192–205. https://doi.org/10.1080/14672715.2021.1882866
Tarrow, S.G. (1994). Power in Movement: Social Movements, Collective Action and Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Taylor, V., & Van dyke, N. (2004). “Get Up, Stand Up”: Tactical Repertoires of Social Movements. In D.A. Snow, S.A. Soule, & H. Kriesi (Eds.), The Blackwell Companion to Social Movements (pp. 262–293). Oxford: Blackwell.
The Daily Star (2020). Shahed Captured. July 16. https://www.thedailystar.net/frontpage/news/shahed-captured-1931029
We are Social & Hootsuite (2019). Digital 2019: Bangladesh [PowerPoint slides]. Slideshare, February 3. https://www.slideshare.net/DataReportal/digital-2019-bangladesh-january-2019-v01
Zamir, H. (2014). Diffusion of Protest Information in Twitter During Shahbag Movement of Bangladesh. Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 51(1), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1002/meet.2014.14505101131
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Anwesha Chakraborty, Alice Mattoni
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
