Resilience and Gender-Structural Change in Universities: How Bottom-Up Approaches Can Leverage Transformation When Top-Level Management Support Fails

Authors

  • María Bustelo Complutense University of Madrid https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7054-9889

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.6092/issn.1971-8853/17787

Keywords:

gender structural change, gender equality plans, gender equality in academia & research, European research projects, Spanish Universities

Abstract

This article is a reflection on my involvement in SUPERA (2018–2022), a project funded by the European Commission under Horizon 2020, that aims at fostering institutional and structural change in academic and research institutions for integrating gender equality through the implementation of Gender Equality Plans (GEPs). For that, I take on my experience at the Complutense University of Madrid (UCM), which was both European coordinator and implementing partner in the consortium, during a period marked by global challenges, such as the COVID-19 pandemic. Each of the six SUPERA implementing institutions also faced local and national institutional changes of different kinds and natures, obliging, both for each partner and for the consortium, an adaptation and revision of strategies and former plans, whilst also resulting in a rich mutual learning experience. Presenting the theoretical bases of the European Structural Change Approach first, I analyse the different situations in which Higher Education and research related institutions participate as implementing partners in European structural change projects, which have  been funded by the European Commission under specific calls since the 7th Framework Research Program. I reflect on the different responses given by the project Consortium and teams, and, in the third part of the article, focus on the UCM experience, and more concretely on the changing dynamics of top-management support and bottom-up strategies during the project. Therefore, I use the case of the SUPERA for illustrating and comparing different forms of institutional commitment to gender-related structural change and transformation, and the UCM for exploring the dynamics between top-level support and bottom-up approaches, arguing that these should be balanced and mutually supportive, and highlighting how one or the other might act as a substituting force in the absence of the other.

References

Bencivenga, R., & Drew, E. (2021). Promoting Gender Equality and Structural Change in Academia Through Gender Equality Plans: Harmonising EU and National Initiatives. GENDER – Zeitschrift für Geschlecht, Kultur und Gesellschaft, 13(1), 27–42. https://doi.org/10.3224/gender.v13i1.03

Benschop, Y., & Verloo, M. (2011). Gender Change, Organizational Change, and Gender Equality Strategies. In E. Jeanes, D. Knights, & P. Yancey-Martin (Eds.), Handbook of Gender, Work and Organization (pp. 277–290). London: Wiley.

Bleijenbergh, I. (2018). Transformational Change Towards Gender Equality: An Autobiographical Reflection on Resistance During Participatory Action Research. Organization, 25, 131–138. https://doi:10.1177/1350508417726547

Bustelo, M. (2020). Resilience and Gender Structural Change in COVID-19 Times. SUPERA: Supporting the Promotion of Equality in Research and Academia, 21 April 2020. https://www.superaproject.eu/resilience-and-gender-structural-change-in-covid-19-times/

Bustelo, M., Pajares Sánchez, L., & de Dios Ruiz, P. (2021a). Desigualdades al descubierto en la universidad por la crisis de la COVID-19. Impacto de género en las condiciones de trabajo, uso del tiempo y desempeño académico en la UCM. SUPERA Report, March 2021. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6900346

Bustelo, M., Pajares Sánchez, L., & de Dios Ruiz, P. (2021b). Inequalities Exposed at the University by the COVID-19 Crisis: The Impact of Gender on Working Conditions, Time Use and Academic Performance at UCM (R. Legha. Trans.). SUPERA Report, March 2021. https://zenodo.org/record/6900324

Campanini Vilhena, F., & Pizarro, J. (2021). Promoting Gendered Structural Change in Leadership in Higher Education: The Interaction Between Formal and Informal Rules. Investigaciones Feministas, 12(2), 319–330. https://dx.doi.org/10.5209/infe.72334

Caprile, M. (2022). Going Beyond the Formal Adoption of a Gender Equality Plan. Guide for Universities. TARGET Report. Institut für Höhere Studien. https://10.5281/zenodo.6514658

Caprile, M., Bettachy, M., Duhaček, D., Mirazić, M., Palmén, R., & Kussy, A. (2022). Structural Change Towards Gender Equality: Learning from Bottom-up and Top-down Experiences of GEP Implementation in Universities. In A. Wroblewski & R. Palmén (Eds.), Overcoming the Challenge of Structural Change in Research Organisations: A Reflexive Approach to Gender Equality (pp. 161–179). Bingley: Emerald. https://doi.org/10.1108/978-1-80262-119-820221010

Clavero, S., & Galligan, Y. (2020). Analysing Gender and Institutional Change in Academia: Evaluating the Utility of Feminist Institutionalist Approaches. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 42(6), 650–666. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360080X.2020.1733736

Council of Europe. (2004). Gender Mainstreaming Conceptual Framework, Methodology and Presentation of Good Practices. Group of Specialists on Mainstreaming (EG-S-MS) Final Report. Council of Europe. https://rm.coe.int/1680596135

de Cheveigné, S., Knoll, B., Bustelo, M., Engebretsen, E., & Sandström, U. (2017). Interim Evaluation: Gender Equality as a Crosscutting Issue in Horizon 2020. Long Version. Brussels: European Commission. https://hal.science/hal-02948895/

EIGE. (2016). Gender Equality in Academia and Research. GEAR tool. European Institute for Gender Equality. (Last Version 2022). https://eige.europa.eu/gender-mainstreaming/toolkits/gear

Etzkowitz, M., & Ranga, M. (2011). Gender Dynamics in Science and Technology: From the “Leaky Pipeline” to the “Vanish Box”. Brussels Economic Review, 54(2–3), 131–147. https://ideas.repec.org/a/bxr/bxrceb/2013-108936.html

European Commission. (1999). Communication on “Women and Science – Mobilising Women to Enrich European Research.” European Commission Communication No. COM/1999/76. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:51999DC0076

European Commission. (2012a). Communication on “A Reinforced European Research Area Partnership for Excellence and Growth.” European Commission Communication No. COM/2012/0392 Final. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=celex%3A52012DC0392

European Commission. (2012b). Structural Change in Research Institutions: Enhancing Excellence, Gender Equality and Efficiency in Research and Innovation. Report of the Expert Group on Structural Change. Brussels: Publications Office. https://eige.europa.eu/sites/default/files/structural-changes-final-report_en_0.pdf

European Commission. (2014). Promote Gender Equality in Particular by Supporting Structural Change in the Organisation of Research Institutions and in the Content of Research Activities. European Commission, 14 September 2014. https://cordis.europa.eu/programme/id/H2020-EU.5.b./en

European Commission. (2016). Commission Presents its Evaluation of the 7th Framework Programme for Research. European Commission Communication No. MEMO/16/146. https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/de/MEMO_16_146

European Commission. (2017). Support to Research Organisations to Implement Gender Equality Plans. European Commission, 27 April 2017. https://cordis.europa.eu/programme/id/H2020_SwafS-03-2016-2017/en

European Commission. (2019). ERA Progress Report 2018: the European Research Area Advancing Together the Europe of Research and Innovation. Brussels: Publications Office. https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2777/118067

Espinosa-Fajardo, J., Bustelo, M., & Velasco, M. (2016). Evaluating Gender Structural Change: Guidelines for Evaluating Gender Equality Action Plans. GENOVATE Technical Report. University of Bradford. https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14352/27621

Espinosa-Fajardo, J., Bustelo, M., & Velasco, M. (2022). ¿Cómo evaluar el cambio estructural de género en universidades? Aprendizajes de una práctica colaborativa y feminista. IgualdadES, 7, 413–440. https://doi.org/10.18042/cepc/IgdES.7.03

Ferguson, L. (2021). Analytical Review: Structural Change for Gender Equality in Research and Innovation. Helsinki: Ministry of Education and Culture. https://julkaisut.valtioneuvosto.fi/bitstream/handle/10024/162958/OKM_2021_4.pdf

FESTA. (2016). Handbook on Resistance to Gender Equality in Academia. FESTA Expert Report No. FESTA-2016-010. Uppsala University. https://www.festa-europa.eu/sites/festa-europa.eu/files/FESTA%20D7.1%20Handbook%20on%20Resistance%20to%20Gender%20Equality%20in%20Academia.pdf

Helsinki Call for Action. (2019). Advancing Gender Equality in Research and Innovation in Europe. NEWPATHWAYS Report. Finnish Ministry of Education and Culture. https://genderaction.eu/wp-content/uploads/2019/11/Helsinki-Call-for-Action_FINAL.pdf

Kalpazidou Schmidt, E., & Cacace, M. (2019). Setting Up a Dynamic Framework to Activate Gender Equality Structural Transformation in Research Organizations. Science and Public Policy, 46(3), 321–338. https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scy059

Lipinsky, A., & Wroblewski, A. (2021). Revisiting Gender Equality Policy and the Role of University Top Management. In P. O’Connor & K. White (Eds.), Gender, Power and Higher Education in a Globalised World (pp. 163–186). Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.

MIZS. (2021). The Ljubljana Declaration on Gender Equality in Research and Innovation. GOV.SI, 25 November, 2021. https://www.gov.si/en/news/2021-11-25-the-ljubljana-declaration-on-gender-equality-in-research-and-innovation/

Palmén, R., & Kalpazidou Schmidt, E. (2019). Analysing Facilitating and Hindering Factors for Implementing Gender Equality Interventions in R&I: Structures and Processes. Evaluation and Program Planning, 77, 101726. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2019.101726

Pell, A.N. (1996). Fixing the Leaky Pipeline: Women Scientists in Academia. Journal of Animal Science, 74, 2843–2848. https://doi.org/10.2527/1996.74112843x

Ranea-Triviño, B., Pajares, L., Bustelo, M., & Pereira, B.C.J. (2022). Report on Case Studies on the Effects and Consequences of Institutional Responses to Gender-based Violence along the 7Ps in Research Performing Organisations. UniSAFE Deliverable No. 5.2. Complutense University of Madrid. https://zenodo.org/record/7585857#.ZB10OfbMLjq

Schiebinger, L., & Schraudner, M. (2011). Interdisciplinary Approaches to Achieving Gendered Innovations in Science, Medicine, and Engineering. Interdisciplinary Science Reviews, 36(2), 154–167. https://doi.org/10.1179/030801811X13013181961518

Thomson, A., Palmén, R., Reidl, S., Barnard, S., Beranek, S., Dainty, A.R.J., & Hassan, T.M. (2022). Fostering Collaborative Approaches to Gender Equality Interventions in Higher Education and Research: The Case of Transnational and Multi-institutional Communities of Practice. Journal of Gender Studies, 31(1), 36–54. https://doi.org/10.1080/09589236.2021.1935804

Tildesley, R., Lombardo, E., & Verge, T. (2021). Power Struggles in the Implementation of Gender Equality Policies: The Politics of Resistance and Counter-resistance in Universities. Politics & Gender, 18(4), 879–892. https://www.doi.org/10.1017/S1743923X21000167

Tornasi, Z., & Delaney, N. (2020). Gender Equality Achievements in Horizon 2020 and Recommendations on the Way Forward. Brussels: European Commission. Directorate-General for Research and Innovation. https://apre.it/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/KI0220258ENN.en

UCM. (2022). Plan de Igualdad. Madrid: Universidad Complutense de Madrid.

Van den Brink, M., & Benschop, Y. (2011). Gender Practices in the Construction of Academic Excellence: Sheep with Five Legs. Organisation, 19(4), 507-‐524. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350508411414293

Wroblewski, A., & Palmén, R. (2022). A Reflexive Approach to Structural Change. In A. Wroblewski & R. Palmén (Eds.), Overcoming the Challenge of Structural Change in Research Organisations: A Reflexive Approach to Gender Equality (pp. 15–32). Bingley: Emerald.

Downloads

Published

2023-12-12 — Updated on 2023-12-20

Versions

How to Cite

Bustelo, M. (2023). Resilience and Gender-Structural Change in Universities: How Bottom-Up Approaches Can Leverage Transformation When Top-Level Management Support Fails. Sociologica, 17(2), 17–36. https://doi.org/10.6092/issn.1971-8853/17787

Issue

Section

Symposium