Taking Quantitative Evaluation of Intellectual Labour Seriously: A Debate about Juan Pablo Pardo-Guerra’s The Quantified Scholar (CUP, 2022)

Authors

  • Riccardo Emilio Chesta Department of Electronics, Information and Bioengineering, Polytechnic University of Milan; META, Social Sciences and Humanities for Science and Technology; NBFC, National Biodiversity Future Center https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7962-1755

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.6092/issn.1971-8853/18126

Keywords:

Science of science, Sociology of Knowledge, Intellectual labor, Research evaluation, Quantification

Abstract

The rise of quantitative research evaluation has changed not only the way knowledge is rated and ranked, but the way scientific knowledge is produced. This Focus discusses the outcomes of Juan Pablo Pardo-Guerra’s research on the transformation of the British social sciences. While pushing social scientists to adapt to the new canons of evaluation, research assessment frameworks have increased disciplinary homogeneity at the detriment of diversity. Moving beyond the specificity of the British case, the comments that follow critically engage with the perspectives and proposals advanced by the author.

References

Desrosières, A. (2016). The Quantification of the Social Sciences: An Historical Comparison. In I. Bruno, F. Jany-Catrice, & B. Touchelay (Eds.), The Social Sciences of Quantification. From Politics of Large Numbers to Target-Driven Policies (pp. 183–204). Berlin: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-44000-2_15

Ollion, É. (2023). Review Essay on Pardo-Guerra’s The Quantified Scholar. Sociologica, 17(3), 149–155. https://doi.org/10.6092/issn.1971-8853/17867

Pardo-Guerra, J.P. (2022). The Quantified Scholar. How Research Evaluations Transformed the British Social Sciences. New York City, NY: Columbia University Press.

Saltelli, A. (2023). The Impossible Moderation of Pardo-Guerra: Juan Pablo Pardo-Guerra, The Quantified Scholar. How Research Evaluation Transformed the British Social Sciences. Sociologica, 17(3), 157–161. https://doi.org/10.6092/issn.1971-8853/17596

Saltelli, A., & Di Fiore, M. (Eds.). (2023). The Politics of Modeling. Numbers Between Science and Policy. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198872412.001.

Shore, C., & Wright, S. (2015). Governing by Numbers: Audit Culture, Rankings and The New World Order. Social Anthropology/Anthropologie Sociale, 23(1), 22–28. https://doi.org/10.1111/1469-8676.12098

Weber, M. (1917). Wissenschaft als Beruf. Munich: Duncker & Humboldt.

Downloads

Published

2024-03-12

How to Cite

Chesta, R. E. (2023). Taking Quantitative Evaluation of Intellectual Labour Seriously: A Debate about Juan Pablo Pardo-Guerra’s The Quantified Scholar (CUP, 2022). Sociologica, 17(3), 145–148. https://doi.org/10.6092/issn.1971-8853/18126

Issue

Section

Focus