System Effects, Failure, and Repair: Two Cases
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.6092/issn.1971-8853/18646Keywords:
Boundary Work, Ethnocognition, Heterarchy, Liabilities of Technological and Organizational Innovation, System EffectsAbstract
This paper argues for the importance of studying the systemic causes of organization failures. Taking a systems approach calls for both a theoretical and methodological framing that examines system effects: the relation between conditions, actors, and actions in the institutional environment, as they affect organizations, changing them, and consequently changing the workplace, technology, tasks, and the actions and reactions of the people who work there. All organizations are vulnerable to system effects — competition for scarce resources necessary to achieving organization goals, including survival, status, and legitimacy in their organization field. Consequently, this research aims to fill gaps in what is known about failure by asking how and why, of two organizations with similar operations and under the same constraints, one is subject to repeat catastrophic failures, while the other has been able to maintain safety. To this end, this research is a cross-case comparative analysis based on historical ethnographies of two crises in large socio-technical systems, looking for analogies and differences. Both cases reveal the institutional constraints and internal responses to the liabilities of technological and organizational innovation: NASA’s decision to launch the Space Shuttle Challenger, and Air Traffic Control response to the intersection of a staffing shortage and automation. The conclusions have implications for both policy and for our understanding of institutional persistence, change, and agency.
References
Beunza, D., & Stark, D. (2003). The Organization of Responsiveness: Innovation and Recovery in the Trading Rooms of Lower Manhattan. Socio-Economic Review, 1(2), 135–164. https://doi.org/10.1093/soceco/1.2.135
Beunza, D., & Stark, D. (2004). Tools of the Trade: The Socio-Technology of Arbitrage in a Wall Street Trading Room. Industrial and Corporate Change, 13(2), 369–400. https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/dth015
Beunza, D., & Stark, D. (2011). Seeing Through the Eyes of Others: Dissonance Within and Across Trading Rooms. In K. Knorr Cetina & A. Preda (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of the Sociology of Finance (pp. 203–221). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Burawoy, M. (1982). Manufacturing Consent: Changes in the Labor Process Under Monopoly Capitalism. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Columbia Accident Investigation Board Report. (2003). U.S. Independent Agencies and Commission, Vol. I. Washington, D.C.
Deener, A. (2020). The Problem with Feeding Cities: The Social Transformation of Infrastructure, Abundance, and Inequality in America. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
DiMaggio, P. (1988). Interest and Agency in Institutional Theory. In L.G. Zucker (Ed.), Research on Institutional Patterns: Environment and Culture (pp. 3–21). Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.
DiMaggio, P.J., & Powell, W.W. (1983). The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147–160. https://doi.org/10.2307/2095101
Erikson, K., & Peek, L. (2022). The Continuing Storm: Learning from Katrina. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.
Geertz, C. (1983). Local Knowledge: Further Essays in Interpretive Anthropology. New York, NY: Basic Books.
Hughes, T.P. (1979). The Electrification of America: The System Builders. Technology and Culture, 20(1), 124–161. https://doi.org/10.2307/3103115
Hughes, T.P. (1993). Networks of Power: Electrification in Western Society 1880–1930. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Hutchins, E.A. (1995). How a Cockpit Remembers its Speeds. Cognitive Science, 19(3), 265–288. https://doi.org/10.1016/0364-0213(95)90020-9
Jervis, R. (1997). System Effects: Complexity in Political and Social Life. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400822409
Le Coze, J.C. (2021). A Broad (Multi-Level) Safety Research and Strategy: A Sociological Study. Safety Science, 136, 105132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2020.105132
Lounsbury, M. & Hirsch, P. (Eds.) (2010). Markets on Trial: The Economic Sociology of the U.S. Financial Crisis: Part B. Leeds: Emerald.
Mahoney, J., & Thelen, K. (Eds.) (2010). Explaining Institutional Change: Ambiguity, Agency, and Power. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
MacKenzie, D. (2011). The Credit Crisis as a Problem in the Sociology of Knowledge. American Journal of Sociology, 116(6), 1778–1841. https://doi.org/10.1086/659639
Merton, R.K. (1936). The Unanticipated Consequences of Social Action. American Sociological Review, 1(6), 894–904. https://doi.org/10.2307/2084615
Perrow, C.B. (1984). Normal Accidents: Living with High-Risk Technologies. New York, NY: Basic Books.
Pinch, T., & Bijker, W. (1984). The Social Construction of Facts and Artefacts: Or How the Sociology of Science and Technology Might Benefit Each Other. Social Studies of Science, 14(3), 399–441. https://doi.org/10.1177/030631284014003004
Rilinger, G. (2021). The Organizational Roots of Market Design Failure: Structural Abstraction, the Limits of Hierarchy, and the California Energy Crisis of 2000–2001. (MPlfG Discussion Paper No. 21/6). Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies, Cologne. https://hdl.handle.net/21.11116/0000-0009-8D53-B
Sagan, S. (1993). The Limits of Safety: Organizations, Accidents, and Nuclear Weapons. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Snook, S. (1996). Practical Drift: The Friendly Fire Shootdown over Northern Iraq. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Stark, D. (1999). Heterarchy: Distributing Intelligence and Organizing Diversity. In J.H. Clippinger III (Ed.), The Biology of Business: Decoding the Natural Laws of Enterprise (pp. 153–179). Hoboken, NJ: Jossey-Bass.
Stark, D.C. (2011). The Sense of Dissonance: Accounts of Worth in Economic Life. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Suchman, L. (1997). Centers of Coordination: A Case and Some Themes. In L.B. Resnick, R. Säljö, C. Pontecorvo, & B. Burge (Eds.), Discourse, Tools, and Reasoning: Essays on Situated Cognition (pp. 41–62). Berlin: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-03362-3_3
Turner, B.A. (1978). Man-Made Disasters. London: Wykeham.
Vaughan, D. (1983). Controlling Unlawful Organizational Behavior: Social Structure and Corporate Misconduct. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Vaughan, D. (1996). The Challenger Launch Decision: Risky Technology, Culture, and Deviance at NASA. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Vaughan, D. (1997). The Trickle-Down Effect: Policy Decisions, Risky Work, and the Challenger Tragedy. California Management Review, 39(2), 80–102. https://doi.org/10.2307/41165888
Vaughan, D. (1999). The Dark Side of Organizations: Mistake, Misconduct, and Disaster. Annual Review of Sociology, 25(1), 271–305. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.25.1.271
Vaughan, D. (2004). Theorizing Disaster: Analogy, Historical Ethnography, and the Challenger Accident. Ethnography, 5(30), 313–345. https://doi.org/10.1177/1466138104045659
Vaughan, D. (2014). Theorizing: Analogy, Cases, and Comparative Social Organization. In R. Swedberg (Ed.), Theorizing in Social Science (pp. 61–84). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Vaughan, D. (2021). Dead Reckoning: Air Traffic Control, System Effects, and Risk. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Weick, K.E. (1993). The Collapse of Sensemaking in Organizations: The Mann-Gulch Disaster. Administrative Science Quarterly, 38(4), 628–652. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393339
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Diane Vaughan
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
