The Interpretation of Cultures: Geertz Is Still in Town
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.6092/issn.1971-8853/18664Keywords:
Anthropology, culture, Geertz (Clifford), interpretation, thick descriptionAbstract
Clifford Geertz’s The Interpretation of Cultures (1973) is widely regarded as one of the most important contributions to the humanities and social sciences in general and anthropology in particular. On its 50th anniversary, the literature drawing on this monumental work is so vast that it is hard to see how anything of significance may still be added to the wide range of insights gained from the in-depth engagement with its main argument. The noticeable differences in opinion between followers and detractors of Geertz’s project notwithstanding, most commentators will agree that The Interpretation of Cultures, having dominated the agenda of Anglophone anthropology for at least two decades after its publication, has had a major and lasting impact on neighbouring disciplines and subdisciplines — notably sociology, social psychology, politics, history, philosophy, and cultural studies. This paper aims to demonstrate that the key conceptual components of Geertz’s enterprise can be located in his case for an interpretive theory of culture, epitomized in the methodological commitment to providing a ‘thick description’. The first half of this paper comprises an inquiry into the core assumptions underlying Geertz’s defence of this endeavour, before moving, in the second half, to an assessment of some controversial issues arising from his approach.
References
Adorno, T.W. (1973). Negative Dialectics (E.B. Ashton, Trans.). London: Routledge. (Original work published 1966)
Alcoff, L.M. (Eds.). (1998). Epistemology: The Big Questions. Oxford: Blackwell.
Apel, K. (1984). Understanding and Explanation: A Transcendental-Pragmatic Perspective (G. Warnke, Trans.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. (Original work published 1979)
Archer, M. (2007). Making Our Way Through the World: Human Reflexivity and Social Mobility. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511618932
Baert, P. (2003). Pragmatism, Realism and Hermeneutics. Foundations of Science, 8(1), 89–106. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022445814115
Baert, P. (2005). Max Weber’s Interpretative Method. In P. Baert, Philosophy of the Social Sciences: Towards Pragmatism (pp. 37–60). Cambridge: Polity.
Baggini, J. (2012). Ethics: The Big Questions. London: Quercus.
Bailey, J. (2000). Some Meanings of ‘the Private’ in Sociological Thought. Sociology, 34(3), 381–402. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0038038500000250
Barnard, H. (1990). Bourdieu and Ethnography: Reflexivity, Politics and Praxis. In R. Harker, C. Mahar, & C. Wilkes (Eds.), An Introduction to the Work of Pierre Bourdieu: The Practice of Theory (pp. 58–85). Basingstoke: Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-21134-0_3
Beller, S., Bender, A., & Medin, D.L. (2012). Should Anthropology Be Part of Cognitive Science? Topics in Cognitive Science, 4(3), 342–353. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1756-8765.2012.01196.x
Bender, A., & Beller, S. (2015). The Mutual Challenge of Anthropology and Cognitive Science. Social Anthropology, 23(2), 199–200. https://doi.org/10.1111/1469-8676.12116
Berger, P.L., & Luckmann, T. (1967). The Social Construction of Reality: A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge. London: Penguin. (Original work published 1966)
Blackburn, S. (2009). The Big Questions: Philosophy. London: Quercus.
Bloch, M. (2012). Anthropology and the Cognitive Challenge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bohman, J. (1997). Reflexivity, Agency and Constraint: The Paradoxes of Bourdieu’s Sociology of Knowledge. Social Epistemology, 11(2), 171–186. https://doi.org/10.1080/02691729708578841
Boltanski, L., & Thévenot, L. (2000). The Reality of Moral Expectations: A Sociology of Situated Judgement. Philosophical Explorations, 3(3), 208–231. https://doi.org/10.1080/13869790008523332
Bourdieu, P. (1980). Le sens pratique. Paris: Minuit.
Bourdieu, P. (1993). Comprendre. In P. Bourdieu (Eds.), La misère du monde (pp. 1389–1447). Paris: Seuil.
Bourdieu, P. (1997). Méditations pascaliennes. Paris: Seuil.
Bourdieu, P. (1998). La domination masculine. Paris: Seuil.
Bourdieu, P. (1999). Scattered Remarks. European Journal of Social Theory, 2(3), 333–340. https://doi.org/10.1177/13684319922224563
Bourdieu, P. (2004). Science of Science and Reflexivity (R. Nice, Trans). Cambridge: Polity. (Original work published 2001)
Bourdieu, P., & Eagleton, T. (1992). Doxa and Common Life. New Left Review, 191, 111–121.
Bourdieu, P., Schultheis, F., & Pfeuffer, A. (2011). With Weber against Weber: In Conversation with Pierre Bourdieu. In S. Susen & B.S. Turner (Eds.), The Legacy of Pierre Bourdieu (S. Susen, Trans) (pp. 111–124). London: Anthem Press. (Original work published 1999–2000)
Bourdieu, P., & Wacquant, L. (1992a). Language, Gender, and Symbolic Violence. In P. Bourdieu & L. Wacquant, An Invitation to Reflexive Sociology (pp. 140–174). Cambridge: Polity.
Bourdieu, P. & Wacquant, L. (1992b). The Personal is Social. In P. Bourdieu & L. Wacquant, An Invitation to Reflexive Sociology (pp. 202–215). Cambridge: Polity.
Bouvier, A. (2007). An Argumentativist Point of View in Cognitive Sociology. European Journal of Social Theory, 10(3), 465–480. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368431007080707
Brekhus, W.H., & Ignatow, G. (Eds.). (2019). The Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Sociology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Brown, P. (2006). Cognitive Anthropology. In C. Jourdan & K. Tuite (Eds.), Language, Culture, and Society: Key Topics in Linguistic Anthropology (pp. 96–114). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Burkitt, I. (1997). The Situated Social Scientist: Reflexivity and Perspective in the Sociology of Knowledge. Social Epistemology, 11(2), 193–202. https://doi.org/10.1080/02691729708578843
Butt, T., & Langdridge, D. (2003). The Construction of Self: The Public Reach into the Private Sphere. Sociology, 37(3), 477–492. https://doi.org/10.1177/00380385030373005
Carey, S. (2015). The Science of Cognitive Science. Social Anthropology, 23(2), 204–207. https://doi.org/10.1111/1469-8676.12119
Cavell, S. (2002). Must We Mean What We Say? A Book of Essays (Updated ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Original work published 1969)
Celikates, R. (2018). Critique as Social Practice: Critical Theory and Social Self-Understanding (N. van Steenbergen, Trans). London: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers. (Original work published 2009)
Cerulo, K.A. (2010). Mining the Intersections of Cognitive Sociology and Neuroscience. Poetics, 38(2), 115–132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.poetic.2009.11.005
Chernilo, D. (2017). Debating Humanity. Towards a Philosophical Sociology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Cicourel, A.V. (1974). Cognitive Sociology: Language and Meaning in Social Interaction. New York, NY: Free Press.
Collier, D., Hidalgo, F.D., & Maciuceanu, A.O. (2006). Essentially Contested Concepts: Debates and Applications. Journal of Political Ideologies, 11(3), 211–246. https://doi.org/10.1080/13569310600923782
Condren, C. (2009). Public, Private and the Idea of the ‘Public Sphere’ in Early-modern England. Intellectual History Review, 19(1), 15–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/17496970902722866
Cossu, A. (2021). Clifford Geertz, Intellectual Autonomy, and Interpretive Social Science. American Journal of Cultural Sociology, 9(3), 347–375. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41290-019-00085-8
Cossu, A. (2022). Talcott Parsons and Clifford Geertz: Modernization, Functionalism, and Interpretive Social Science. In A. Javier Treviño & H. Staubmann (Eds.), The Routledge International Handbook of Talcott Parsons Studies (pp. 261–270). London: Routledge.
Crouch, C. (2016). The Knowledge Corrupters: Hidden Consequences of the Financial Takeover of Public Life. Cambridge: Polity.
Cutler, A.C. (1997). Artifice, Ideology and Paradox: The Public/Private Distinction in International Law. Review of International Political Economy, 4(2), 261–285. https://doi.org/10.1080/096922997347788
D’Andrade, R.G. (1995). The Development of Cognitive Anthropology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Dallmayr, F.R., & McCarthy, T.A. (Eds.). (1977). Understanding and Social Inquiry. South Bend, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.
Dilthey, W. (1883). Einleitung in die Geisteswissenschaften. Versuch einer Grundlegung für das Studium der Gesellschaft und der Geschichte, Vol. 1. Leipzig: Duncker & Humblot.
DiMaggio, P. (1997). Culture and Cognition. Annual Review of Sociology, 23, 263–287. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.23.1.263
Dunaj, L., & Mertel, K.C.M. (Eds.). (2022). Hans-Herbert Kögler’s Critical Hermeneutics. London: Bloomsbury.
Eder, K. (2007). Cognitive Sociology and the Theory of Communicative Action: The Role of Communication and Language in the Making of the Social Bond. European Journal of Social Theory, 10(3), 389–408. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368431007080702
Einstein, A. (1934). On the Method of Theoretical Physics. Philosophy of Science, 1(2), 163–169. https://doi.org/10.1086/286316
Floyd, J. (2020). Wittgenstein on Ethics: Working through Lebensformen. Philosophy & Social Criticism, 46(2), 115–130. https://doi.org/10.1177/0191453718810918
Forst, R. (2002). Contexts of Justice: Political Philosophy beyond Liberalism and Communitarianism (J.M.M. Farrell, Trans). Berkeley, CA: University of California Press. (Original work published 1994)
Forst, R.(2012). The Right to Justification. Elements of a Constructivist Theory of Justice (J. Flynn, Trans.). New York, NY: Columbia University Press. (Original work published 2007)
Forst, R. (2013a). Zum Begriff eines Rechtfertigungsnarrativs. In A. Fahrmeir (Ed.), Rechtfertigungsnarrative. Zur Begründung normativer Ordnung durch Erzählungen (pp. 11–28). Frankfurt am Main: Campus.
Forst, R. (2013b). Toleration in Conflict: Past and Present (C. Cronin, Trans.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Original work published 2003)
Forst, R. (2013c). Justification and Critique. Towards a Critical Theory of Politics (C. Cronin, Trans). Cambridge: Polity. (Original work published 2011)
Forst, R. (2014). Justice, Democracy and the Right to Justification: Rainer Forst in Dialogue. London: Bloomsbury.
Forst, R. (2015a). Normativität und Macht. Zur Analyse sozialer Rechtfertigungsordnungen. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
Forst, R.(2015b). Noumenal Power. Journal of Political Philosophy, 23(2), 111–127. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopp.12046
Forst, R. (2017). Noumenal Alienation: Rousseau, Kant and Marx on the Dialectics of Self-Determination. Kantian Review, 22(4), 523–551. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1369415417000267
Forst, R., & Günther, K. (Eds.). (2011a). Die Herausbildung normativer Ordnungen. Interdisziplinäre Perspektiven. Frankfurt: Campus.
Forst, R., & Günther, K. (2011b). Die Herausbildung normativer Ordnungen. In R. Forst & K. Günther (Eds.), Die Herausbildung normativer Ordnungen. Interdisziplinäre Perspektiven (pp. 11–30). Frankfurt: Campus.
Forst, R., Hartmann, M., Jaeggi, R., & Saar, M. (Eds.). (2009). Sozialphilosophie und Kritik. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.
Gallie, W.B. (1955). Essentially Contested Concepts. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 56, 167–198. https://doi.org/10.1093/aristotelian/56.1.167
Geertz, C. (1973). The Interpretation of Cultures: Selected Essays. New York, NY: Basic Books.
Geertz, C. (1984). Distinguished Lecture: Anti Anti-Relativism. American Anthropologist, 86(2), 263–278. https://doi.org/10.1525/aa.1984.86.2.02a00030
Geertz, C. (1988). Works and Lives: The Anthropologist as Author. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Geertz, C. (2000). Local Knowledge: Further Essays in Interpretive Anthropology (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Basic Books. (Original work published 1983)
Geuss, R. (2001). Public Goods, Private Goods. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Goodenough, W.H. (1981). Culture, Language and Society (2nd ed.). Menlo Park, CA: Benjamin/Cummings. (Original work published 1971)
Goodenough, W.H. (2006). Description and Comparison in Cultural Anthropology. New Brunswick, NJ: AldineTransaction. (Original work published 1970)
Habermas, J. (1962). Strukturwandel der Öffentlichkeit: Untersuchungen zu einer Kategorie der bürgerlichen Gesellschaft. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.
Habermas, J. (1987). The Problem of Understanding Meaning in the Social Sciences. In J. Habermas, The Theory of Communicative Action. Volume 1: Reason and the Rationalization of Society (T. McCarthy, Trans.) (pp. 102–141). Cambridge: Polity. (Original work published 1981)
Habermas, J. (1989). The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: An Inquiry into a Category of Bourgeois Society (T. Burger & F. Lawrence, Trans.). Cambridge: Polity. (Original work published 1962)
Habermas, J. (2001). From a Constitutive Theory to a Communicative Theory of Society (Sellars and Wittgenstein): Communicative and Cognitive Uses of Language. In J. Habermas, On the Pragmatics of Social Interaction: Preliminary Studies in the Theory of Communicative Action (B. Fultner, Trans.) (pp. 45–65). Cambridge: Polity. (Original work published 1984)
Habermas, J. (2003). The Future of Human Nature (H. Beister, M. Pensky, & W. Rehg, Trans.). Cambridge: Polity. (Original work published 2001)
Honneth, A., & Joas, H. (1988). Social Action and Human Nature (R. Meyer, Trans.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Original work published 1980)
Hunter, J.F.M. (1968). ‘Forms of Life’ in Wittgenstein’s Philosophical Investigations. American Philosophical Quarterly, 5(4), 233–243.
Hurley, S., & Chater, N. (Eds.). (2005). Perspectives on Imitation: From Neuroscience to Social Science. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/5331.001.0001
Husserl, E. (1970). The Crisis of European Sciences and Transcendental Phenomenology. An Introduction to Phenomenological Philosophy (D. Carr, Trans.). Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press. (Original work published 1954)
Husserl, E. (2001). Logical Investigations (J.N. Findlay, Trans.). London: Routledge. (Original work published 1900/1901)
Husserl, E. (2012). Ideas: General Introduction to Pure Phenomenology (W.R. Boyce Gibson, Trans.). London: Routledge. (Original work published 1913/1931)
Ingold, T. (2015). Human Cognition is Intrinsically Social, Developmental and Historical. Social Anthropology, 23(2), 188–191. https://doi.org/10.1111/1469-8676.12112
Joas, H. (1991). The Unhappy Marriage of Hermeneutics and Functionalism. In A. Honneth & H. Joas (Eds.), Communicative Action: Essays on Jürgen Habermas’s ‘The Theory of Communicative Action’ (J. Gaines and D.L. Jones, Trans.) (pp. 97–118). Cambridge: Polity. (Original work published 1986)
Kant, I. (1995). Kritik der reinen Vernunft (Wilhelm Weischedel, ed.). Frankfurt: Suhrkamp. (Original work published 1781)
Kaufmann, L., & Clément, F. (2015). Must Cognitive Anthropology Be Mentalistic? Moving towards a Relational Ontology of Social Reality. Social Anthropology, 23(2), 201–203. https://doi.org/10.1111/1469-8676.12118
Keesing, R.M. (1974). Theories of Culture. Annual Review of Anthropology, 3, 73–97. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.an.03.100174.000445
Keller, D.R. (Eds.). (2010). Environmental Ethics: The Big Questions. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
Kluckhohn, C. (1949). Mirror for Man: The Relation of Anthropology to Modern Life. New York, NY: McGraw Hill.
Kögler, H. (1996). The Self-Empowered Subject: Habermas, Foucault and Hermeneutic Reflexivity. Philosophy & Social Criticism, 22(4), 13–44. https://doi.org/10.1177/019145379602200402
Kögler, H. (1996). The Power of Dialogue: Critical Hermeneutics after Gadamer and Foucault (P. Hendrickson, Trans). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. (Original work published 1992)
Kögler, H., & Stueber, K.R. (Eds.). (2000). Empathy and Agency: The Problem of Understanding in the Human Sciences. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
Korsmeyer, C. (Eds.). (1998). Aesthetics: The Big Questions. Oxford: Blackwell.
Kripke, S.A. (1982). Wittgenstein on Rules and Private Language: An Elementary Exposition. Oxford: Blackwell.
Kurasawa, F. (2003). Prolegomena to an Intercultural Critical Theory. Current Perspectives in Social Theory, 22, 325–348. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0278-1204(03)80015-4
Lakatos, I., Feyerabend, P., & Motterlini, M. (1999). For and Against Method: Including Lakatos's Lectures on Scientific Method and the Lakatos-Feyerabend Correspondence. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Langer, S.K. (1942). Philosophy in a New Key: A Study in the Symbolism of Reason, Rite, and Art. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Laudan, L. (1983). The Demise of the Demarcation Problem. In R.S. Cohen & L. Laudan (Eds.), Physics, Philosophy, and Psychoanalysis: Essays in Honor of Adolf Grünbaum (pp. 111–127). Dordrecht: D. Reidel.
Lloyd, G.E.R. (1983). Science, Folklore and Ideology: Studies in the Life Sciences in Ancient Greece. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Marston, S.A. (1995). The Private Goes Public: Citizenship and the New Spaces of Civil Society. Political Geography, 14(2), 194–198. https://doi.org/10.1016/0962-6298(95)91665-Q
Morgan, A. (2017). A Preponderance of Objects: Critical Theory and the Turn to the Object. Adorno Studies, 1(1), 13–30. http://adornostudies.org/ojs/index.php/as/article/view/3
Nye, A. (Eds.). (1998). Philosophy of Language: The Big Questions. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.
Oberst, M. (2015). Two Worlds and Two Aspects: On Kant’s Distinction between Things in Themselves and Appearances. Kantian Review, 20(1), 53–75. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1369415414000284
Outhwaite, W. (1986). Understanding Social Life: The Method Called Verstehen (2nd ed.). Lewes: Jean Stroud. (Original work published 1975)
Outhwaite, W. (2000). Rekonstruktion und methodologischer Dualismus. In S. Müller-Doohm (Ed.), Das Interesse der Vernunft: Rückblicke auf das Werk von Jürgen Habermas seit ‘Erkenntnis und Interesse’ (pp. 218–241). Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.
Pharo, P. (2007). How is Sociological Realism Possible? Sociology after Cognitive Science. European Journal of Social Theory, 10(3), 481–496. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368431007080708
Pinker, S. (2002). The Blank Slate. The Modern Denial of Human Nature. London: Allen Lane.
Powell, W.W., & Clemens, E.S. (Eds.). (1998). Private Action and the Public Good. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Regnier, D., & Astuti, R. (2015). Introduction: Taking up the Cognitive Challenge. Social Anthropology, 23(2), 131–134. https://doi.org/10.1111/1469-8676.12117
Resnik, D.B. (2000). A Pragmatic Approach to the Demarcation Problem. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 31(2), 249–267. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0039-3681(00)00004-2
Robbins, D. (1998). The Need for an Epistemological ‘Break’. In M. Grenfell & D. James, Bourdieu and Education: Acts of Practical Theory (pp. 27–51). London: Falmer Press.
Roitblat, H.L., Herman, L.M., & Nachtigall , P.E. (Eds.). (1993). Language and Communication: Comparative Perspectives. Comparative Cognition and Neuroscience Series. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Rosa, H. (2020). The Uncontrollability of the World (J.C. Wagner, Trans.). Cambridge: Polity. (Original work published 2018)
Ryle, G. (2009). Collected Papers. Volume 2, Collected Essays 1929–1968. London: Routledge. (Original work published 1971)
Salmerón Castro, F.I. (2002). Modernidad y prácticas políticas: democracia, eslabonamientos y mediaciones en la sociedad civil. Revista Mexicana de Sociología, 64(1), 31–65. https://doi.org/10.2307/3541480
Sewell, W.H, Jr. (1999). The Concept(s) of Culture. In V.E. Bonnell, L. Hunt, & R. Biernacki (Eds.), Beyond the Cultural Turn: New Directions in the Study of Society and Culture (pp. 35–61). Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Sherratt, T.N., & Wilkinson, D.M. (2009). Big Questions in Ecology and Evolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Solomon, R.C., & Higgins, K.M. (2014). The Big Questions: A Short Introduction to Philosophy (9th International ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth. (Original work published 1994)
Steinberger, P.J. (1999). Public and Private. Political Studies, 47(2), 292–313. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9248.00201
Sterba, J.P. (Eds.). (2009). Ethics: The Big Questions (2nd ed.). Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell. (Original work published 1998)
Strauss, C. (2006). Cognitive Anthropology. In K. Brown (Eds.) Encyclopedia of Language & Linguistics (2nd ed.) (pp. 529–532). Oxford: Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B0-08-044854-2/03016-9
Strydom, P. (2007). Introduction: A Cartography of Contemporary Cognitive Social Theory. European Journal of Social Theory, 10(3), 339–356. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368431007080699
Strydom, P. (2015). The Latent Cognitive Sociology in Habermas: Extrapolated from Between Facts and Norms. Philosophy & Social Criticism, 41(3), 273–291. https://doi.org/10.1177/0191453714563877
Stump, E., & Murray, M.J. (Eds.). (1999). Philosophy of Religion: The Big Questions. Oxford: Blackwell.
Susen, S. (2007). The Foundations of the Social: Between Critical Theory and Reflexive Sociology. Oxford: Bardwell Press.
Susen, S. (2010). Meadian Reflections on the Existential Ambivalence of Human Selfhood. Studies in Social and Political Thought, 17, 62–81. https://ssrn.com/abstract=1700179
Susen, S. (2011a). Bourdieu and Adorno on the Transformation of Culture in Modern Society: Towards a Critical Theory of Cultural Production. In S. Susen & B.S. Turner (Eds.), The Legacy of Pierre Bourdieu: Critical Essays (pp. 173–202). London: Anthem Press. https://doi.org/10.7135/UPO9780857289278.009
Susen, S. (2011b). Critical Notes on Habermas's Theory of the Public Sphere. Sociological Analysis, 5(1), 37–62. https://ssrn.com/abstract=2043824
Susen, S. (2012). ‘Open Marxism’ against and beyond the ‘Great Enclosure’? Reflections on How (Not) to Crack Capitalism. Journal of Classical Sociology, 12(2), 281–331. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468795X12443547
Susen, S. (2013a). Comments on Patrick Baert and Filipe Carreira da Silva’s Social Theory in the Twentieth Century and Beyond. Towards a ‘Hermeneutics-Inspired Pragmatism’? Distinktion: Scandinavian Journal of Social Theory, 14(1), 80–101. https://doi.org/10.1080/1600910X.2012.690772
Susen, S. (2013b). Bourdieusian Reflections on Language: Unavoidable Conditions of the Real Speech Situation. Social Epistemology, 27(3–4), 199–246. https://doi.org/10.1080/02691728.2013.818733
Susen, S. (2014). 15 Theses on Power. Philosophy and Society, 25(3), 7–28. https://doi.org/10.2298/FID1403007S
Susen, S. (2015). The ‘Postmodern Turn’ in the Social Sciences. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137318237
Susen, S. (2016a). Pierre Bourdieu et la distinction sociale. Un essai philosophique. Oxford: Peter Lang.
Susen, S. (2016b). The Sociological Challenge of Reflexivity in Bourdieusian Thought. In D. Robbins (Eds.), The Anthem Companion to Pierre Bourdieu (pp. 49–93). London: Anthem Press.
Susen, S. (2016c). Towards a Critical Sociology of Dominant Ideologies: An Unexpected Reunion between Pierre Bourdieu and Luc Boltanski. Cultural Sociology, 10(2), 195–246. https://doi.org/10.1177/1749975515593098
Susen, S. (2016d). Reconstructing the Self: A Goffmanian Perspective. In H.F. Dahms & E.R. Lybeck (Eds.), Reconstructing Social Theory, History and Practice, Vol 35: Current Perspectives in Social Theory (pp. 111–143). Bingley: Emerald.
Susen, S. (2018). The Seductive Force of ‘Noumenal Power’: A New Path (or Impasse) for Critical Theory? Journal of Political Power, 11(1), 4–45. https://doi.org/10.1080/2158379X.2017.1362734
Susen, S. (2021a). Contemporary Social Theory. In K. Murji, S. Neal, & J. Solomos (Eds.), An Introduction to Sociology (pp. 121–141). London: Sage.
Susen, S. (2021b). Mysteries, Conspiracies, and Inquiries: Reflections on the Power of Superstition, Suspicion, and Scrutiny. Società Mutamento Politica: Rivista Italiana di Sociologia, 12(23), 25–62. https://doi.org/10.36253/smp-12996
Susen, S. (2022a). The Case for a Critical Hermeneutics: From the Understanding of Power to the Power of Understanding. In L. Dunaj & K.C.M. Mertel (Eds.), Hans-Herbert Kögler’s Critical Hermeneutics (pp. 7–69). London: Bloomsbury.
Susen, S. (2022b). Critical Remarks on Existence Theory: Between Existentialism and Phenomenology. Journal of Classical Sociology, 22(1), 49–84. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468795X211051514
Susen, S. (2023a). Lessons from Reckwitz and Rosa: Towards a Constructive Dialogue between Critical Analytics and Critical Theory. Social Epistemology, 37(5), 545–591. https://doi.org/10.1080/02691728.2023.2201578
Susen, S. (2023b). Towards an Ontology of Contemporary Reality? Theory, Culture & Society, 40(7–8), 33–55. https://doi.org/10.1177/02632764221143943
Susen, S. (2023c). A New Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere? With, against, and beyond Habermas. Society, 60(6), 842–867. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12115-023-00908-y
Taylor, C. (1977). Interpretation and the Sciences of Man. In F.R. Dallmayr & T.A. McCarthy (Eds.), Understanding and Social Inquiry (pp. 101–131). South Bend, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.
Thévenot, L. (2007). The Plurality of Cognitive Formats and Engagements: Moving between the Familiar and the Public. European Journal of Social Theory, 10(3), 409–423. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368431007080703
Triandis, H.C. (1996). The Psychological Measurement of Cultural Syndromes. American Psychologist, 51(4), 407–415. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.51.4.407
Turner, S. (2007). Social Theory as a Cognitive Neuroscience. European Journal of Social Theory, 10(3), 357–374. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368431007080700
Tylor, E.B. (1881). Anthropology: An Introduction to the Study of Man and Civilization. London: Macmillan.
Tylor, E.B. (1920). Primitive Culture: Researches into the Development of Mythology, Philosophy, Religion, Language, Art and Custom. London: John Murray. (Original work published 1871)
van Inwagen, P., & Zimmerman, D.W. (Eds.). (2008). Metaphysics: The Big Questions (2nd ed.). Oxford: Blackwell. (Original work published 1998)
Wacquant, L. (1992). Epistemic Reflexivity. In P. Bourdieu & L. Wacquant, An Invitation to Reflexive Sociology (pp. 36–46). Cambridge: Polity.
Ward, A. (2006). Kant: The Three Critiques. Cambridge: Polity.
Ward, K. (2008). The Big Questions in Science and Religion. West Conshohocken, PA: Templeton Foundation Press.
Weber, M. (1980). Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft. Grundriß der verstehenden Soziologie (5th ed.). Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck. (Original work published 1922)
Weintraub, J.A., & Kumar, K. (Eds.). (1997). Public and Private in Thought and Practice: Perspectives on a Grand Dichotomy. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.
Whiting, D. (Eds.). (2010). The Later Wittgenstein on Language. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Williams, R. (1994). The Analysis of Culture. In J. Storey (Eds.), Cultural Theory and Popular Culture: A Reader (pp. 48–56). New York, NY: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
Wilson, E.O. (2004). On Human Nature (25th Anniversary ed.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. (Original work published 1978)
Wittgenstein, L. (2009). Philosophical Investigations (G.E.M. Anscombe, P.M.S. Hacker, & J. Schulte, Trans.) (4th ed.). Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell. (Original work published 1953)
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Simon Susen
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
