The Resource Bind: System Failure and Legitimacy Threats in Sociotechnical Organizations


  • Janet A. Vertesi Department of Sociology, Princeton University
  • danah boyd Microsoft Research



Failure, Legitimacy, Organizations, Technology, Science


This paper decouples legitimacy crises from technical failure, observing what happens when sociotechnical organizations confront a legitimacy crisis that does not stem from a technical failure. We draw on two parallel ethnographic studies within U.S. governmental agencies which administer complex sociotechnical systems: NASA and the Census Bureau. We show how time and money have dual, contested symbolic meanings that effect both the organizations’ legitimacy and the technical viability of their missions. This duality places public-sector technical organizations in a bind, and enables hostile actors to push these organizations to the brink, triggering legitimacy crises by pressuring their systems toward technical failure. Efforts on the ground may enable these projects to survive technically, but at the loss of individual and institutional reputations that reconfigure institutional fields along politically expedient lines. We demonstrate the advantage of bringing an institutional perspective to technical system threat and failure by addressing broader questions of legitimacy in high-risk organizations and sociotechnical systems.


Abdelnour, S., Hasselbladh, H., & Kallinikos, J. (2017). Agency and Institutions in Organization Studies. Organization Studies, 38(12), 1775–1792.

Anderson, M.J. (2015). The American Census: A Social History New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

Andrews, R., & Boyne, G.A. (2008). Organizational Environments and Public-Service Failure: An Empirical Analysis. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 26(4), 788–807.

Ashforth, B.E., & Gibbs, B.W. (1990). The Double-Edge of Organizational Legitimation. Organization Science, 1(2), 177–194.

Bagchi, S. (2016). The Political Economy of Tax Enforcement: A Look at the Internal Revenue Service From 1978 to 2010. Journal of Public Policy, 36(3), 335–380.

Bagley, N. (2019). The Procedure Fetish. Michigan Law Review, 118(3), 345–402.

Barley, S.R. (2010). Building an Institutional Field to Corral a Government: A Case to Set an Agenda for Organization Studies. Organization Studies, 31(6), 777–805.

Bazelon, E., & Wines, M. (2021). How the Census Bureau Stood Up to Donald Trump’s Meddling. New York Times, August 12. Available at:

Beck, U. (1992). Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity. London: Sage.

Berman, E.P. (2022). Thinking Like an Economist: How Efficiency Replaced Equality in U.S. Public Policy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Binder, A. (2007). For Love and Money: Organizations’ Creative Responses to Multiple Environmental Logics. Theory and Society, 36(6), 547–571.

Boin, A., & Schulman, P. (2008). Assessing NASA’s Safety Culture: The Limits and Possibilities of High-Reliability Theory. Public Administration Review, 68(6), 1050–1062.

Bouk, D., & boyd, d. (2021). Democracy’s Data Infrastructure. Knight First Amendment Institute at Columbia University.

boyd, d., & Sarathy, J. (2022). Differential Perspectives: Epistemic Disconnects Surrounding the U.S. Census Bureau’s Use of Differential Privacy. Harvard Data Science Review, Special Issue 2.

Brown, A.D., & Jones, M.R. (1998). Doomed to Failure: Narratives of Inevitability and Conspiracy in a Failed IS Project. Organization Studies, 19(1), 73–88.

Brown, D.W. (2021). The Mission: A True Story Victoria, BC: Custom House.

Callen, J. (2016). The U.S. Census Bureau: Driving Cost Savings and Operational Efficiency by Leveraging Employee Creativity and Innovation. Commerce.Gov.

Carpenter, D.P. (2001). The Forging of Bureaucratic Autonomy: Reputations, Networks, and Policy Innovation in Executive Agencies, 1862-1928 Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Carpenter, D.P. (2010). Reputation and Power: Organizational Image and Pharmaceutical Regulation at the FDA Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Chai, S., Doshi, A.R., & Silvestri, L. (2022). How Catastrophic Innovation Failure Affects Organizational and Industry Legitimacy: The 2014 Virgin Galactic Test Flight Crash. Organization Science, 33(3), 1068–1093.

DiMaggio, P.J. (1988). Interest and Agency in Institutional Theory. In L.G. Zucker (Ed.), Institutional Patterns and Organizations: Culture and Environment (pp. 3–-21). Cambridge, MA: Ballinger

DiMaggio, P.J., & Powell, W.W. (1983). The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147–160.

Downer, J. (2007). When the Chick Hits the Fan: Representativeness and Reproducibility in Technological Tests. Social Studies of Science, 37(1), 7–26.

Downer, J. (2011). “737-Cabriolet”: The Limits of Knowledge and the Sociology of Inevitable Failure. American Journal of Sociology, 117(3), 725–762.

Downer, J. (2014). Disowning Fukushima: Managing the Credibility of Nuclear Reliability Assessment in the Wake of Disaster. Regulation & Governance, 8(3), 287–309.

Eyal, G. (2019). The Crisis of Expertise. Cambridge: Polity.

Fligstein, N., & McAdam, D. (2015). A Theory of Fields. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Garud, R., Schildt, H.A., & Lant, T.K. (2014). Entrepreneurial Storytelling, Future Expectations, and the Paradox of Legitimacy. Organization Science, 25(5), 1479–1492.

Gore, A.J., Review, N.P., & Clinton, B. (2001). From Red Tape to Results: Creating a Government That Works Better and Costs Less. Amsterdam: Fredonia.

Hallett, T. (2010). The Myth Incarnate: Recoupling Processes, Turmoil, and Inhabited Institutions in an Urban Elementary School. American Sociological Review, 75(1), 52–74.

Haraway, D.J. (1997). Modest Witness@Second Millenium. FemaleMan Meets OncoMouse: Feminism and Technoscience. London: Routledge.

Haveman, H.A., Russo, M.V., & Meyer, A.D. (2001). Organizational Environments in Flux: The Impact of Regulatory Punctuations on Organizational Domains, CEO Succession, and Performance. Organization Science, 12(3), 253–273.

Hecht, G. (1998). The Radiance of France: Nuclear Power and National Identity After World War II. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

Heckscher, C.C. (1994). Defining the Post-Bureaucratic Type. In A. Donnellon & C.C. Heckscher (Eds.), The Post-Bureaucratic Organization: New Perspectives on Organizational Change (pp. 14–62). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Herd, P., & Moynihan, D.P. (2019). Administrative Burden: Policymaking by Other Means. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.

Hilgartner, S. (2007). Overflow and Containment in the Aftermath of Disaster. Social Studies Science, 37(1), 153–158.

Inoue, C. (2020). Election Cycles and Organizations: How Politics Shapes the Performance of State-owned Enterprises over Time. Administrative Science Quarterly, 65(3), 677–709.

Jackson, S.J., & Buyuktur, A. (2014). Who Killed WATERS? Mess, Method, and Forensic Explanation in the Making and Unmaking of Large-scale Science Networks. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 39(2), 285–308.

Jackson, S.J., Pompe, A., & Krieshok, G. (2012). Repair Worlds: Maintenance, Repair, and ICT for Development in Rural Namibia. In S. Poltrock & C. Simone (Eds.), CSCW ’12: Proceedings of the ACM 2012 conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (pp. 107–116).

Kaminski, A.P. (2012). Faster, Better, Cheapter: A Sociotechnical Perspective on Programmatic Choice, Success, and Failure in NASA’s Solar System Exploration Program. In R.D. Launius (Ed.), Exploring the Solar System: The History and Science of Planetary Exploration (pp. 77–101). New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.

Kraft, B., & Wolf, S. (2018). Through the Lens of Accountability: Analyzing Legitimacy in Environmental Governance. Organization & Environment, 31(1), 70–92.

Leonnig, C. (2021). Zero Fail: The Rise and Fall of the Secret Service. New York, NY: Random House.

Leveson, N., Dulac, N., Marais, K., & Carroll, J. (2009). Moving Beyond Normal Accidents and High Reliability Organizations: a Systems Approach to Safety in Complex Systems. Organization studies, 30(2–3), 227–249.

Lewis, M. (2019). The Fifth Risk: Undoing Democracy. New York, NY: W.W. Norton & Company.

Light, P.C. (2014). A Cascade of Failures: Why Government Fails, and How to Stop It. Brookings.

Lounsbury, M., & Glynn, M.A. (2001). Cultural Entrepreneurship: Stories, Legitimacy, and the Acquisition of Resources. Strategic Management Journal, 22(6-7), 545–564.

MacKenzie, D.A. (2006). An Engine, not a Camera: How Financial Models Shape Markets. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

Maniha, J., & Perrow, C. (1965). The Reluctant Organization and the Aggressive Environment. Administrative Science Quarterly, 10(2), 238–257.

McCurdy, H.E. (1994). Inside NASA: High Technology and Organizational Change in the U.S. Space Program: High Technology and Organizational Change in the American Space Program. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press.

McCurdy, H.E. (2003). Faster, Better, Cheaper: Low-Cost Innovation in the U.S. Space Program. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press.

Mettler, S. (2011). The Submerged State: How Invisible Government Policies Undermine American Democracy. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

Meyer, J.W., & Rowan, B. (1977). Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83(2), 340–363.

Meyer, M.W., & Zucker, L.G. (1989). Permanently Failing Organizations. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

Miles, R.E., & Snow, C.C. (1992). Causes of Failure in Network Organizations. California Management Review, 34(4), 53–72.

Mitchell, T. (2002). Rule of Experts: Egypt, Techno-politics, Modernity. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

Moynihan, D.P. (2022a). Public Management for Populists: Trump’s Schedule F Executive Order and the Future of the Civil Service. Public Administration Review, 82(1), 174–178.

Moynihan, D.P. (2022b). Delegitimization, Deconstruction and Control: Undermining the Administrative State. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 699(1), 36–-49.

Muniesa, F., & Callon, M. (2007). Economic Experiments and the Construction of Markets. In D. MacKenzie & L. Siu (Eds.), Do Economists Make Markets? On the Performativity of Economics (pp. 163–189). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Orlikowski, W.J. (2007). Sociomaterial Practices: Exploring Technology at Work. Organization Studies, 28(9), 1435–1448.

Pardo-Guerra, J.P. (2022). The Quantified Scholar: How Research Evaluations Transformed the British Social Sciences. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.

Peirce, W.S. (1981). Bureaucratic Failure and Public Expenditure. New York, NY: Academic Press.

Perrow, C.B. (1999). Normal Accidents: Living with High-Risk Technologies. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Perrow, C.B. (2008). Complexity, Catastrophe, and Modularity. Sociological Inquiry, 78(2), 162–173.

Pozen, D.E., & Scheppele, K.L. (2020). Executive Underreach, in Pandemics and Otherwise. American Journal of International Law, 114(4), 608–617.

Roberts, K. (1990). Managing High Reliability Organizations. California Management Review, 32(4), 101–113.

Roberts, K.H. (1989). New Challenges in Organizational Research: High Reliability Organizations. Industrial Crisis Quarterly, 3(2), 111–125.

Robinson, J.N. (2020). Making Markets on the Margins: Housing Finance Agencies and the Racial Politics of Credit Expansion. American Journal of Sociology, 125(4), 974–1029.

Rose-Ackerman, S. (2019). Executive Rulemakingand Democratic Legitimacy: “Reform” in the United States and the United Kingdom’s Route to Brexit. Chicago-Kent Law Review, 94(2), 267–313.

Sagan, S.D. (1995). The Limits of Safety: Organizations, Accidents, and Nuclear Weapons. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Sagan, S.D. (2004a). Learning from Normal Accidents. Organization & Environment, 17(1), 15–19.

Sagan, S.D. (2004b). The Problem of Redundancy Problem: Why More Nuclear Security Forces May Produce Less Nuclear Security. Risk Analysis, 24(4), 935–946.

Schivelbusch, W. (1986). The Railway Journey: The Industrialization of Time and Space in the 19th Century. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

Schmid, S.D. (2011). When Safe Enough is not Good Enough: Organizing Safety at Chernobyl. Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, 67(2), 19–29.

Sewell, W.H. (1992). A Theory of Structure: Duality, Agency, and Transformation. American Journal of Sociology, 98(1), 1–29.

Shrivastava, S., Sonpar, K., & Pazzaglia, F. (2009). Normal Accident Theory Versus High Reliability Theory: A Resolution and Call for an Open Systems View of Accidents. Human Relations, 62(9), 1357–1390.

Srivastava, S.B. (2015). Intraorganizational Network Dynamics in Times of Ambiguity. Organization Science, 26(5), 1365–1380.

Steinhardt, S.B. (2016). Breaking Down While Building Up: Design and Decline in Emerging Infrastructures. In J. Kaye & A. Druin (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 2198–2208). New York, NY: ACM.

Strathern, M. (2000). Audit Cultures: Anthropological Studies in Accountability, Ethics and the Academy. London/New York, NY: Routledge.

Stryker, R. (1994). Rules, Resources, and Legitimacy Processes: Some Implications for Social Conflict, Order, and Change. American Journal of Sociology, 99(4), 847–910.

Suchman, M.C. (1995). Managing Legitimacy: Strategic and Institutional Approaches. The Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 571–610.

Thornton, P.H., Ocasio, W., & Lounsbury, M. (2012). The Institutional Logics Perspective a New Approach to Culture, Structure, and Process. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Turco, C. (2016). The Conversational Firm. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.

Vance, A. (2023). When the Heavens Went on Sale: The Misfits and Geniuses Who Put Space Within Reach. New York, NY: Harper Collins.

Vaughan, D. (1996). The Challenger Launch Decision: Risky Technology, Culture, and Deviance at NASA. Chicago, IL: University Of Chicago Press.

Vertesi, J. (2020). Testing Planets: Institutions Tested in an Era of Uncertainty. The British Journal of Sociology, 71(3), 474–488.

Wajcman, J. (2015). Pressed for Time: The Acceleration of Life in Digital Capitalism. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.

Wherry, F.F. (2012). The Culture of Markets. Cambridge, MA: Polity.

Zelizer, V.A. (1997). The Social Meaning of Money. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Zerubavel, E. (1976). Timetables and Scheduling: On the Social Organization of Time. Sociological Inquiry, 46(2), 87–94.




How to Cite

Vertesi, J. A., & boyd, danah. (2024). The Resource Bind: System Failure and Legitimacy Threats in Sociotechnical Organizations. Sociologica, 17(3), 25–49.