A Response to Critics

Authors

  • Juan Pablo Pardo-Guerra Department of Sociology, University of California San Diego https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3192-1104

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.6092/issn.1971-8853/18948

Keywords:

Knowledge, Neoliberalism, Universities, Research Evaluations, Organizations

Abstract

In this short response to the comments by Étienne Ollion and Andrea Saltelli on The Quantified Scholar (CUP, 2022), the author Juan Pablo Pardo-Guerra explores some of the methodological and ethical dimensions of the valuation of research in the present.

References

Ahmed, S. (2023). The Feminist Killjoy Handbook. London: Allen Lane.

Ollion, É. (2023). Review Essay on Pardo-Guerra’s The Quantified Scholar. Sociologica, 17(3), 149–155. https://doi.org/10.6092/issn.1971-8853/17867

Pardo-Guerra, J.P. (2022). The Quantified Scholar. How Research Evaluations Transformed the British Social Sciences. New York City, NY: Columbia University Press.

Pardo-Guerra, J.P., & Pahwa, P. (2023). The Extended Computational Case Method: A Framework for Research Design. Sociological Methods and Research, 51(4), 1826–1867. https://doi.org/10.1177/00491241221122616

Saltelli, A. (2023). The Impossible Moderation of Pardo-Guerra: Juan Pablo Pardo-Guerra, The Quantified Scholar. How Research Evaluation Transformed the British Social Sciences. Sociologica, 17(3), 157–161. https://doi.org/10.6092/issn.1971-8853/17596

Downloads

Published

2024-03-12

How to Cite

Pardo-Guerra, J. P. (2023). A Response to Critics. Sociologica, 17(3), 163–168. https://doi.org/10.6092/issn.1971-8853/18948

Issue

Vol. 17 No. 3 (2023)

Section

Focus

License

Copyright (c) 2023 Juan Pablo Pardo-Guerra

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.