The Power of Babel: When Misunderstanding can be Productive

Özgecan Koçak; Phanish Puranam

doi:10.6092/issn.1971-8853/18956

Authors

Özgecan Koçak Goizueta Business School, Emory University https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6974-2382

Özgecan Koçak is Associate Pofessor of Organization & Management at Emory University’s Goizueta Business School (USA). Her research focuses on how shared understandings (such as communication codes, categorization systems, and identity schema) emerge and shape behavior in organizations and markets.
Phanish Puranam INSEAD https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0032-8538

Phanish Puranam is the Roland Berger Chaired Professor of Strategy and Organization Design at INSEAD (Singapore). His current research explores how digital algorithms are shaping organizations as tools, templates, and teammates.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.6092/issn.1971-8853/18956

Keywords:

Productive misunderstandings, strategic ambiguity, miscommunication, communication

Abstract

Misunderstandings often lead to accidents, delays, missed opportunities, waste, and conflict in organizations. However, on occasion, they can also lead to beneficial outcomes, at least for one of the parties involved. Prior scholarship on productive misunderstandings and strategic ambiguity illustrates this with a range of examples in diverse contexts, but there is no coherent framework to understand the conditions under which misunderstandings can be beneficial. This paper elucidates three mechanisms — establishing truce, encouraging search, and creating resonance — through which misunderstandings can create positive outcomes, as well as the different boundary conditions for each mechanism.

References

Abdallah, C., & Langley, A. (2014). The Double Edge of Ambiguity in Strategic Planning. Journal of Management Studies, 51(2), 235–264. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12002

Arrow, K.J. (1974). The Limits of Organization. New York, NY: Norton.

Axley, S.R. (1984). Managerial and Organizational Communication in Terms of the Conduit Metaphor. Academy of Management Review, 9(3), 428–437. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1984.4279664

Battilana, J., & Casciaro, T. (2012). Change Agents, Networks, and Institutions: A Contingency Theory of Organizational Change. Academy of Management Journal, 55(2), 381–398. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2009.0891

Bechky, B.A. (2003). Sharing Meaning Across Occupational Communities: The Transformation of Understanding on a Production Floor. Organization Science, 14(3), 312–330. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.14.3.312.15162

Clark, H.H. (1996). Using Language. Cambridge, CA: Cambridge University Press.

Cremer, J., Garicano, L., & Prat, A. (2007). Language and the Theory of the Firm. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 122(1), 373–407. https://doi.org/10.1162/qjec.122.1.373

Davenport, S., & Leitch, S. (2005). Circuits of Power in Practice: Strategic Ambiguity as Delegation of Authority. Organization Studies, 26(11), 1603–1623. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840605054627

Edwards, P.N., Mayernik, M.S., Batcheller, A.L., Bowker, G.C., & Borgman, C.L. (2011). Science Friction: Data, Metadata, and Collaboration. Social Studies of Science, 41(5), 667–690. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312711413314

Eisenberg, E.M. (1984). Ambiguity as Strategy in Organizational Communication. Communication Monographs, 51(3), 227–242. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637758409390197

Fleck, L. (2012). Genesis and Development of a Scientific Fact (F. Bradley & T.J. Trenn, Trans.). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. (Original work published 1935)

Foster, C. (2011). Productive Ambiguity in the Learning of Mathematics. For the Learning of Mathematics, 31(2), 3–7.

Galison, P. (1997). Image and Logic: A Material Culture of Microphysics. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

Gioia, D.A., Nag, R., & Corley, K.G. (2012). Visionary Ambiguity and Strategic Change: The Virtue of Vagueness in Launching Major Organizational Change. Journal of Management Inquiry, 21(4), 364–375. https://doi.org/10.1177/1056492612447229

Giorgi, S. (2017). The Mind and Heart of Resonance: The Role of Cognition and Emotions in Frame Effectiveness. Journal of Management Studies, 54(5), 711–738. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12278

Gümüsay, A.A., Smets, M., & Morris, T. (2020). “God at Work”: Engaging Central and Incompatible Institutional Logics through Elastic Hybridity. Academy of Management Journal, 63(1), 124–154. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2016.0481

Jarzabkowski, P., Sillince, J.A., & Shaw, D. (2010). Strategic Ambiguity as a Rhetorical Resource for Enabling Multiple Interests. Human Relations, 63(2), 219–248. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726709337040

Keller, J., & Loewenstein, J. (2011). The Cultural Category of Cooperation: A Cultural Consensus Model Analysis for China and the United States. Organization Science, 22(2), 299–319. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1100.0530

Koçak, Ö., Levinthal, D.A., & Puranam, P. (2023). The Dual Challenge of Search and Coordination for Organizational Adaptation: How Structures of Influence Matter. Organization Science, 34(2), 851–869. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2022.1601

Koçak, Ö., & Puranam, P. (2022). Separated by a Common Language: How the Nature of Code Differences Shapes Communication Success and Code Convergence. Management Science, 68(7), 5287–5310. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2021.4157

Koçak, Ö., & Puranam, P. (2024). Decoding Culture: Tools for Behavioral Strategists. Strategy Science, 9(1), 18–37. https://doi.org/10.1287/stsc.2022.0008

Korovyakovskaya, I., & Chong, H. (2015). An Empirical Study of the Relationships Between Miscommunication and Clashes in Culturally Diverse Work Groups. Journal of International Business Research, 14(3), 41–54.

Lave, C.A., & March, J.G. 1975. An Introduction to Models in the Social Sciences. New York, NY: Harper & Row.

Lawrence, P.R., Barnes, L.B., & Lorsch, J.W. (Eds.). (1976). Organizational Behavior and Administration: Cases and Readings. Homewood, IL: Richard Irwin.

Leitch, S., & Davenport, S. (2007). Strategic Ambiguity as a Discourse Practice: The Role of Keywords in the Discourse on “Sustainable” Biotechnology. Discourse Studies, 9(1), 43–61. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445607072106

Levinthal, D.A. (1997). Adaptation on Rugged Landscapes. Management Science, 43(7), 934–950. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.43.7.934

Liberman, K. (1980). Ambiguity and Gratuitous Concurrence in Inter-Cultural Communication. Human Studies, 3(1), 65–85. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02331801

March, J.G., & Simon, H.A. (1958). Organizations. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

Massicard, E. (2003). Alevism as a Productive Misunderstanding: The Hacibektaş Festival. In P.J. White & J. Jongerden (Eds.), Turkey’s Alevi Enigma (pp. 125–140). Leiden: Brill.

Murphy, G.L. (2002). The Big Book of Concepts. Cambridge, MA: Bradford.

Padgett, J.F., & Ansell, C.K. (1993). Robust Action and the Rise of the Medici, 1400–1434. American Journal of Sociology, 98(6), 1259–1319. https://doi.org/10.1086/230190

Rahmandad, H. (2019). Interdependence, Complementarity, and Ruggedness of Performance Landscapes. Strategy Science, 4(3), 234–249. https://doi.org/10.1287/stsc.2019.0090

Richards, K. 2010. Life: Keith Richards. London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson.

Schegloff, E.A. (1987). Some Sources of Misunderstanding in Talk-in-Interaction. Linguistics, 25(1), 201–218. https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.1987.25.1.201

Schegloff, E.A. (1992). Repair After Next Turn: The Last Structurally Provided Defense of Intersubjectivity in Conversation. American Journal of Sociology, 97(5), 1295–1345. https://doi.org/10.1086/229903

Seidl, D. (2007). General Strategy Concepts and the Ecology of Strategy Discourses: A Systemic-Discursive Perspective. Organization Studies, 28(2), 197–218. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840606067994

Sillince, J., Jarzabkowski, P., & Shaw, D. (2012). Shaping Strategic Action Through the Rhetorical Construction and Exploitation of Ambiguity. Organization Science, 23(3), 630–650. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1110.0670

Sillince, J., & Mueller, F. (2007). Switching Strategic Perspective: The Reframing of Accounts of Responsibility. Organization Studies, 28(2), 155–176. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840606067989

Snook, S.A. (2000). Friendly Fire: The Accidental Shootdown of US Black Hawks Over Northern Iraq. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Solan, L.M. (2004). Pernicious Ambiguity in Contracts and Statutes. Chicago-Kent Law Review, 79(3), 859–888.

Spike, M., Stadler, K., Kirby, S., & Smith, K. (2017). Minimal Requirements for the Emergence of Learned Signaling. Cognitive Science, 41(3), 623–658. https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.12351

Stark, D. (2009). The Sense of Dissonance: Accounts of Worth in Economic Life. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Suddaby, R. (2010). Editor’s Comments: Construct Clarity in Theories of Management and Organization. Academy of Management Review, 35(3), 346–357. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.5465/AMR.2010.51141319

Teubner, G. (2000). Contracting Worlds: The Many Autonomies of Private Law. Social & Legal Studies, 9(3), 399–417. https://doi.org/10.1177/096466390000900305

Wang, Y., & Heynen, H. (2018). Transferring Postmodernism to China: A Productive Misunderstanding. Architectural Theory Review, 22(3), 338–363. https://doi.org/10.1080/13264826.2018.1516680

The Power of Babel: When Misunderstanding can be Productive

Authors

DOI:

Keywords:

Abstract

References

Downloads

Published

How to Cite

Issue

Section

License

Information

Make a Submission

Current Issue