Introduction: Failed! The Sociological Analysis of Failure
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.6092/issn.1971-8853/18960Keywords:
Failure, Winner takes all, Capitalism, Normality, PowerAbstract
In recent years the social sciences have been paying closer attention to failure, to its manifestations in the contemporary world and to the modalities of dealing with it both in theory and in practice. An emergent and interdisciplinary field of analysis has been consolidating under the label of failure studies reflecting a number of social trends. These include the instability of winner-take-all systems, the ubiquity of the new spirit of capitalism, metric-based forms of governmentality, platformization, and changes in cultural attitudes to failure. We argue that the normality of failure calls for a better conceptualization of it. What is needed is a clearer thinking about what failure really means, a better understanding of the mechanisms that generate, reproduce, and terminate it as a normal part of life. The essays collected for this symposium offer fresh insights on the analysis of failure. Taking different areas of social life as a focus, they critically examine the failures of large complex socio-technical systems; the purposefully agency of players in systems failure; the failures of governance and metagovernance; new meanings of policy failures; kaleidoscopic failure; network failure and the moral economy of failure. In doing so they we suggest that a sociology of failure needs to be built on socio-historical understandings of failure in different contexts, cultures, and environments.
References
Barbera, F., & Rees Jones, I. (2023). The Moral Economy of Failure. Sociologica, 17(3), 129–144. https://doi.org/10.6092/issn.1971-8853/18648
Beer, D. (2016). Metric Power. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Boltanski, L., & Chiapello, E. (2005). The New Spirit of Capitalism. International Journal of Politics, Culture, and Society, 18, 161–188. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10767-006-9006-9
Bonfert, B. (2023). “I’m Happy for People to Collaborate, but I Don’t Want to Join in”. Addressing Failure in Community-supported Agriculture Networks. Sociologica, 17(3), 113–127. https://doi.org/10.6092/issn.1971-8853/18336
Brendan, B., & Hughes, A. (2006). The Stigma of Failure: An International Comparison of Failure Tolerance and Second Chancing (ITEC Working Paper 07-25). Centre for Business Research, University of Cambridge. https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/document?repid=rep1&type=pdf&doi=3b561873643d0b02906265bc4084852871cc799d
Cook, P.J., & Frank, H.R. (2010). The Winner-Take-All Society: Why the Few at the Top Get So Much More Than the Rest of Us. New York, NY: Random House.
Elberse, A. (2013). Blockbusters: Why Big Hits — and Big Risks — are the Future of the Entertainment Business. New York, NY: Faber & Faber.
Ellis, S., & Davidi, I. (2005). After-Event Reviews: Drawing Lessons From Successful and Failed Experience. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(5), 857–871. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.90.5.857
Jones, M. (2023). Spaces of Collibration: The Governance and Metagovernance of Failure. Sociologica, 17(3), 51–74. https://doi.org/10.6092/issn.1971-8853/18338
Kalleberg, A.L. (2016). Good Jobs, Bad Jobs. In S. Edgell, E. Granter, & H. Gottfried (Eds.), The Sage Handbook of the Sociology of Work and Employment (pp. 129–147). London: Sage.
Malpas, J., & Wickman, G. (1995). Governance and Failure: On the Limits of Sociology. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Sociology, 31(3), 37–50. https://doi.org/10.1177/144078339503100304
Meyer, M.W., & Zucker, L.G. (1986). Permanently Failing Organizations. Paper presented at the Yale Complex Organization Workshop, Yale University.
Mica, A., Pawlak, M., Horolets, A., & Kubicki, P. (Eds.). (2023a). The Routledge International Handbook of Failure. London: Routledge.
Mica, A., Pawlak, M., & Kubicki, P. (2023b). Expectations of Failure: Political Risks in the Moral Economy of Ignorance and Social Injustice. Sociologica, 17(3), 75–97. https://doi.org/10.6092/issn.1971-8853/18340
Perrow, C. (1999). Normal Accidents: Living with High Risk Technologies. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Rao, H. (1990). Permanently Failing Organizations. Academy of Management Review, 15(4), 706–708. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1990.4310940
Schrank, A, & Whitford, J. (2011). The Anatomy of Network Failure. Sociological Theory, 29(3), 151–177. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9558.2011.01392.x
Sitkin, S.B. (1992). Learning through Failure: The Strategy of Small Losses. Research in Organizational Behavior 14, 231–266. https://cir.nii.ac.jp/crid/1570572700925495040
Skaggs, R. (2023). Kaleidoscopic Failure: The Regularity, Repetition, and Patterning of Failure in the Arts. Sociologica, 17(3), 99–112. https://doi.org/10.6092/issn.1971-8853/18337
Vaughan, D. (1996). The Challenger Launch Decision: Risky Technology, Culture, and Deviance at NASA. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Vaughan, D. (2023). System Effects, Failure, and Repair: Two Cases. Sociologica, 17(3), 7–23. https://doi.org/10.6092/issn.1971-8853/18646
Vertesi, J.A., & boyd, d. (2023). The Resource Bind: System Failure and Legitimacy Threats in Sociotechnical Organizations. Sociologica, 17(3), 25–49. https://doi.org/10.6092/issn.1971-8853/18894
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Filippo Barbera, Ian Rees Jones
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.