Social Theory and the Sociology of Clientelism: Groundwork for a Gramscian Alternative

Authors

  • Simeon J. Newman Department of Sociology, University of Toronto https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2818-3975

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.60923/issn.1971-8853/19189

Keywords:

Clientelism, Social theory, Gift theory, Principal-agent theory, Gramsci

Abstract

The category “clientelism” captures a very wide variety of political phenomena, wider perhaps than other peer concepts. It also harbors the potential to serve as an alternative to both liberal institutionalism and power elite theory. But recent trends in the literature have not realized the category’s potential. The key problem with the literature is that it is on shaky conceptual ground. Toward a revamped sociology of clientelism, this essay attends to associated theoretical problems and potential payoffs. It surveys definitions and probes normative issues at the heart of clientelism. It identifies the accomplishments and limitations of the leading theoretical traditions, offshoots of neo-Durkheimian gift theory and neo-Weberian principal-agent theory. Drawing instead from Gramscian theory, it proposes that we view soliciting subordination as the central feature of clientelism. This approach offers both a lens for unifying phenomena hitherto thought to be very different under a single conceptual scheme and a model for explaining political development. This helps enable the category to serve in a quite general theory which could ultimately provide an alternative to liberal-institutional and elite-pact brands of political sociology.

 

References

Adams, J. (1996). Principals and Agents, Colonialists and Company Men: The Decay of Colonial Control in the Dutch East Indies. American Sociological Review, 61(1), 12–28. https://doi.org/10.2307/2096404

Adams, J. (2005). The Familial State: Ruling Families and Merchant Capitalism in Early Modern Europe. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

Álvarez-Rivadulla, M.J. (2012). Clientelism or Something Else? Squatter Politics in Montevideo. Latin American Politics and Society, 54(1), 37–63. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1548-2456.2012.00142.x

Álvarez-Rivadulla, M.J. (2017). Squatters and the Politics of Marginality in Uruguay. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

Anderson, P. (2017a). The Antinomies of Antonio Gramsci. London & New York: Verso.

Anderson, P. (2017b). The H-word: The Peripeteia of Hegemony. London: Verso.

Aspinall, E. (2014). When Brokers Betray: Clientelism, Social Networks, and Electoral Politics in Indonesia. Critical Asian Studies, 46(4), 545–570. https://doi.org/10.1080/14672715.2014.960706

Auerbach, A.M. (2020). Demanding Development: The Politics of Public Goods Provision in India’s Urban Slums. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Auerbach, A.M., & Thachil, T. (2023). Migrants and Machine Politics: How India’s Urban Poor Seek Representation and Responsiveness. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Auyero, J. (1999). “From the Client’s Point(s) of View”: How Poor People Perceive and Evaluate Political Clientelism. Theory and Society, 28(2), 297–334. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006905214896

Auyero, J. (2000). Poor People’s Politics: Peronist Survival Networks and the Legacy of Evita. Durham: Duke University Press.

Auyero, J., & Benzecry, C. (2017). The Practical Logic of Political Domination: Conceptualizing the Clientelist Habitus. Sociological Theory, 35(3), 179–199. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735275117725767

Baldwin, K. (2013). Why Vote with the Chief? Political Connections and Public Goods Provision in Zambia. American Journal of Political Science, 57(4), 794–809. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12023

Banégas, R. (1998). “Bouffer l’argent”. Politique du ventre, démocratie et clientélisme au Bénin. In J-L. Briquet, & F. Sawicki (Eds.), Le clientélisme politique dans les sociétés contemporaines, pp. 75–109. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.

Barnes, S.T. (2019). Patrons and Power: Creating a Political Community in Metropolitan Lagos. London & New York: Routledge. (Original work published 1986).

Bataille, G. (1988). The Accursed Share, Volume I: Consumption. Translated by R. Hurley. New York: Zone Books. (Original work published 1949).

Berenschot, W. (2018). The Political Economy of Clientelism: A Comparative Study of Indonesia’s Patronage Democracy. Comparative Political Studies, 51(12), 1563–1593. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414018758756

Berenschot, W., & Aspinall, E. (2020). How Clientelism Varies: Comparing Patronage Democracies. Democratization, 27(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2019.1645129

Blau, P. (1964). Exchange and Power in Social Life. New York, London, & Sydney: John Wiley & Sons.

Bodemann, Y.M. (1997). Relations of Production and Class Rule: The Hidden Basis of Patron-Clientage. In B. Wellman, & S.D. Berkowitz (Eds.), Social Structures: A Network Approach, pp. 198–220. (Contemporary Studies in Sociology, Vol. 15). Bingley, UK: Emerald.

Bourdieu, P. (1977). Outline of a Theory of Practice. Cambridge & New York: Cambridge University Press.

Bourdieu, P. (1990). The Logic of Practice. Translated by R. Nice. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press. (Original work published 1980).

Bourdieu, P. (1998). Practical Reason: On the Theory of Action. Stanford: Stanford University Press. (Original work published 1994).

Bourdieu, P. (2000). Pascalian Meditations. Translated by R. Nice. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press. (Original work published 1997).

Briquet, J.-L. (2006). Les formulations savantes d’une catégorie politique. Le clientélisme et l’interprétation sociohistorique du “cas italien”. Genèses, 62(1), 49–68. https://doi.org/10.3917/gen.062.68

Burawoy, M. (2019). Symbolic Violence: Conversations with Bourdieu. Durham: Duke University Press.

Burton, M.G., & Higley, J. (1987). Elite Settlements. American Sociological Review, 52(3), 295–307. https://doi.org/10.2307/2095351

Cadava, G. (2020). The Deep Origins of Latino Support for Trump. The New Yorker, 29 December. https://www.newyorker.com/news/the-political-scene/the-deep-origins-of-latino-support-for-trump

Caillé, A. (2020). The Gift Paradigm: A Short Introduction to the Anti-utilitarian Movement in the Social Sciences. Translated by G. Connell & F. Gauthier. Chicago: Prickly Paradigm Press.

Calhoun, C.W. (1996). The Political Culture: Public Life and the Conduct of Politics. In C.W. Calhoun (Ed.), The Gilded Age: Essays on the Origins of Modern America, pp. 185–213. Wilmington: SR Books.

Calvo, E., & Murillo, M.V. (2013). When Parties Meet Voters: Assessing Political Linkages through Partisan Networks and Distributive Expectations in Argentina and Chile. Comparative Political Studies, 46(7), 851–882. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414012463882

Chubb, J. (1982). Patronage, Power, and Poverty in Southern Italy: A Tale of Two Cities. Cambridge & New York: Cambridge University Press.

Collins, P.H. (1990). Black Feminist Thought: Knowledge, Consciousness, and the Politics of Empowerment. Boston: Unwin Hyman.

Combes, H. (2011). ¿Dónde estamos con el estudio del clientelismo? Desacatos, 36, 13–32. https://sciencespo.hal.science/hal-01024428v1

Cornelius, W.A. (1975). Politics and the Migrant Poor in Mexico City. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

Cotler, J. (1967). The Mechanics of Internal Domination and Social Change in Peru. Studies in Comparative International Development, 3(12), 229–246. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02800596

Coulthard, G.S. (2014). Red Skin, White Masks: Rejecting the Colonial Politics of Recognition. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

de Leon, C., Desai, M., & Tuğal, C. (2009). Political Articulation: Parties and the Constitution of Cleavages in the United States, India, and Turkey. Sociological Theory, 27(3), 193–219. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9558.2009.01345.x

de Leon, C., Desai, M., & Tuğal, C. (Eds.). (2015). Building Blocs: How Parties Organize Society. Stanford, California: Stanford University Press.

Dench, G., Gavron, K., & Young, M. (2006). The New East End: Kinship, Race and Conflict. London: Profile Books.

Desai, M., & Singh, R. (2020). Machine Politics and Clientelism. In C. de Leon, I.W. Martin, J. Misra, & T. Janoski (Eds.), The New Handbook of Political Sociology, pp. 666–680. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Dorman, P. (2024). Clientelism in a Broader Frame. Theory and Society, 53(6), 1389–1413. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11186-024-09582-3

Durkheim, É. (1984). The Division of Labor in Society. Translated by W. D. Halls. New York: Free Press. (Original work published 1893).

Eisenstadt, S.N., & Roniger, L. (1980). Patron-Client Relations as a Model of Structuring Social Exchange. Comparative Studies in Society and History, 22(1), 42–77. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0010417500009154

Eisenstadt, S.N., & Roniger, L. (1984). Patrons, Clients, and Friends: Interpersonal Relations and the Structure of Trust in Society. Cambridge & New York: Cambridge University Press.

Ferguson, J. (2013). Declarations of Dependence: Labour, Personhood, and Welfare in Southern Africa. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 19(2), 223–242. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9655.12023

Ferguson, J. (2015). Give a Man a Fish: Reflections on the New Politics of Distribution. Durham: Duke University Press.

Flynn, P. (1974). Class, Clientelism, and Coercion: Some Mechanisms of Internal Dependency and Control. The Journal of Commonwealth & Comparative Politics, 12(2), 133–156. https://doi.org/10.1080/14662047408447207

Foucault, M. (1977). Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. Translated by A. Sheridan. New York: Vintage Books.

Garrido, M. (2017). Why the Poor Support Populism: The Politics of Sincerity in Metro Manila. American Journal of Sociology, 123(3), 647–685. https://doi.org/10.1086/694076

Garrido, M. (2019). The Patchwork City: Class, Space, and Politics in Metro Manila. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Gay, R. (1990). Popular Incorporation and Prospects for Democracy. Theory and Society, 19(4), 447–463. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00137621

Gay, R. (1994). Popular Organization and Democracy in Rio de Janeiro: A Tale of Two Favelas. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.

Gay, R. (1999). The Broker and the Thief: A Parable (Reflections on Popular Politics in Brazil). Luso-Brazilian Review, 36(1), 49–70. http://www.jstor.org/stable/3513989

Gouldner, A.W. (1973). The Importance of Something for Nothing. In A.W. Gouldner, For Sociology: Renewal and Critique in Sociology Today (pp. 260–299). London: Allen Lane.

Graeber, D. (2011). Debt: The First 5000 Years. New York: Melville House.

Gramsci, A. (1971). Selections from the Prison Notebooks of Antonio Gramsci. Translated by Q. Hoare & G. Nowell-Smith. New York: International Publishers.

Graziano, L. (1973). Patron‐client Relationships in Southern Italy. European Journal of Political Research, 1(1), 3–34. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6765.1973.tb01281.x

Graziano, L. (1975). A Conceptual Framework for the Study of Clientelism. Ithaca: Western Societies Program, Center for International Studies, Cornell University.

Greene, K.F. (2007). Why Dominant Parties Lose: Mexico’s Democratization in Comparative Perspective. Cambridge & New York: Cambridge University Press.

Grindle, M.S. (1977). Patrons and Clients in the Bureaucracy: Career Networks in Mexico. Latin American Research Review, 12(1), 37–66. https://doi.org/10.1017/S002387910003658X

Hagene, T., & González-Fuente, Í. (2016). Deep Politics: Community Adaptations to Political Clientelism in Twenty-First-Century Mexico. Latin American Research Review, 51(2), 3–23. https://doi.org/10.1353/lar.2016.0019

Haynes, N., & Hickel, J. (2016). Hierarchy, Value, and the Value of Hierarchy. Social Analysis, 60(4), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.3167/sa.2016.600401

Heaney, M.T., & Rojas, F. (2015). Party in the Street: The Antiwar Movement and the Democratic Party after 9/11. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Hicken, A. (2011). Clientelism. Annual Review of Political Science, 14, 289–310. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.031908.220508

Hicken, A., Aspinall, E., Weiss, M.L., & Muhtadi, B. (2022). Buying Brokers: Electoral Handouts beyond Clientelism in a Weak-party State. World Politics, 74(1), 77–120. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0043887121000216

Hicken, A., & Nathan, N.L. (2020). Clientelism’s Red Herrings: Dead Ends and New Directions in the Study of Nonprogrammatic Politics. Annual Review of Political Science, 23(1), 277–294. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-050718-032657

Hilgers, T. (2011). Clientelism and Conceptual Stretching: Differentiating among Concepts and among Analytical Levels. Theory and Society, 40(5), 567–588. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11186-011-9152-6

Hilgers, T. (2012). Democratic Processes, Clientelistic Relationships, and the Material Goods Problem. In T. Hilgers (Ed.), Clientelism in Everyday Latin American Politics (pp. 3–22). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

Holland, A.C., & Palmer-Rubin, B. (2015). Beyond the Machine: Clientelist Brokers and Interest Organizations in Latin America. Comparative Political Studies, 48(9), 1186–1223. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414015574883

Hollnsteiner, M.R. (1963). The Dynamics of Power in a Philippine Municipality. Quezon City: Community Development Research Council, University of the Philippines.

Ignatiev, N. (2022). The Backward Workers. In G. Dhondt, Z. Kurti, J. Shanahan (Eds.), Treason to Whiteness is Loyalty to Humanity, pp. 177–183. London: Verso.

James, J. (2016). The Womb of Western Theory: Trauma, Time Theft, and the Captive Maternal. Carceral Notebooks, 12(1), 253–296. https://sites.williams.edu/jjames/files/2019/05/WombofWesternTheory2016.pdf

Jansen, R.S. (2011). Populist Mobilization: A New Theoretical Approach to Populism. Sociological Theory, 29(2), 75–96. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9558.2011.01388.x

Jessop, B. (2016). The State: Past, Present, Future. Cambridge & Malden: Polity Press.

Kandiyoti, D. (1988). Bargaining with Patriarchy. Gender & Society, 2(3), 274–290. https://doi.org/10.1177/089124388002003004

Karpat, K.H. (1976). The Gecekondu: Rural Migration and Urbanization. Cambridge & New York: Cambridge University Press.

Kettering, S. (1986). Patrons, Brokers, and Clients in Seventeenth-century France. New York: Oxford University Press.

Kitschelt, H., & Wilkinson, S.I. (2007). Citizen-politician Linkages: An Introduction. In H. Kitschelt, & S.I. Wilkinson (Eds.), Patrons, Clients, and Policies: Patterns of Democratic Accountability and Political Competition (pp. 1–49). Cambridge & New York: Cambridge University Press.

Krishna, A. (2007). Politics in the Middle: Mediating Relationships between the Citizens and the State in Rural North India. In H. Kitschelt, & S. Wilkinson (Eds.), Patrons, Clients, and Policies: Patterns of Democratic Accountability and Political Competition (pp. 141–158). Cambridge & New York: Cambridge University Press.

Landé, C. (1977). The Dyadic Basis of Clientelism. In S.W. Schmidt, L. Guasti, C. Landé, & J.C. Scott (Eds.), Friends, Followers, and Factions: A Reader in Political Clientelism (pp. xiii–xxxv). Berkeley: University of California Press.

Levenson, Z. (2022). Make “Articulation” Gramscian Again. In S. Chari, M. Hunter, & M. Samson (Eds.), Ethnographies of Power: Working Radical Concepts with Gillian Hart (pp. 187–215). Johannesburg: Wits University Press.

LiPuma, E., & Postone, M. (2020). Gifts, Commodities, and the Encompassment of Others. Critical Historical Studies, 7(1), 167–200. https://doi.org/10.1086/708255

Lukes, S. (2004). Power: A Radical View. Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire & New York: Palgrave Macmillan. (Original work published 1974).

Macinnes, A.I. (2007). Union and Empire: The Making of the United Kingdom in 1707. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Magaloni, B. (2006). Voting for Autocracy: Hegemonic Party Survival and Its Demise in Mexico. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Martin, J.L. (2009). Social Structures. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Mauss, M. (1966). The Gift: Forms and Functions of Exchange in Archaic Societies. Translated by I. Cunnison. London: Cohen & West. (Original work published 1925).

McCarthy, M.A., & Desan, M.H. (2023). The Problem of Class Abstractionism. Sociological Theory, 41(1), 3–26. https://doi.org/10.1177/07352751231152489

McShane, J. (2024). Washington State’s Biggest Private-Sector Union Backs “Uncommitted” Democratic Vote. Mother Jones, 29 February. https://www.motherjones.com/politics/2024/02/washington-state-ufcw-union-democrats-uncommitted-biden/

Médard, J-F. (2000). Clientélisme politique et corruption. Revue Tiers Monde, 161, 75–87. https://doi.org/10.3406/tiers.2000.1051

Medina, L.F., & Stokes, S.C. (2007). Monopoly and Monitoring: An Approach to Political Clientelism. In H. Kitschelt, & S.I. Wilkinson (Eds.), Patrons, Clients, and Policies: Patterns of Democratic Accountability and Political Competition (pp. 68–83). Cambridge & New York: Cambridge University Press.

Merton, R.K. (1968). Social Theory and Social Structure. New York: Free Press. (Original work published 1949).

Mouzelis, N. (1985). On the Concept of Populism: Populist and Clientelist Modes of Incorporation in Semiperipheral Polities. Politics & Society, 14(3), 329–348. https://doi.org/10.1177/003232928501400303

Nelson, J.M. (1979). Access to Power: Politics and the Urban Poor in Developing Nations. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Newbury, C.W. (2003). Patrons, Clients and Empire: Chieftaincy and Over-rule in Asia, Africa and the Pacific. Oxford & New York: Oxford University Press.

Newman, S.J. (2023). Mass Clientelism: Urban Growth and the Dialectic of Nation-Building in 20th Century Latin America. Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Sociology, University of Michigan.

Nichter, S. (2008). Vote Buying or Turnout Buying? Machine Politics and the Secret Ballot. American Political Science Review, 102(1), 19–31. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055408080106

Nichter, S. (2018). Votes for Survival: Relational Clientelism in Latin America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Nichter, S., & Peress, M. (2017). Request Fulfilling: When Citizens Demand Clientelist Benefits. Comparative Political Studies, 50(8), 1086–1117. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414016666838

Parkin, F. (1983). Marxism and Class Theory: A Bourgeois Critique. New York: Columbia University Press.

Parry, J. (1986). The Gift, the Indian Gift and the “Indian gift”. Man, 21(3), 453–473. https://doi.org/10.2307/2803096

Peacock, V. (2016). Academic Precarity as Hierarchical Dependence in the Max Planck Society. HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory, 6(1), 95–119. https://doi.org/10.14318/hau6.1.006

Petty, G.M, Magilligan, D., & Bates Bailey, M. (2022). You Voted for Who? Explaining Support for Trump among Racial and Ethnic Minorities. New Political Science, 44(2), 195–209. https://doi.org/10.1080/07393148.2022.2060004

Pitt-Rivers, J.A. (1954). The People of the Sierra. New York: Criterion Books.

Post, A.E. (2018). Cities and Politics in the Developing World. Annual Review of Political Science, 21, 115–133. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-042716-102405

Poulantzas, N. (1973). Political Power and Social Classes. Translated by T. O’Hagan. London: NLB & Sheed & Ward. (Original work published 1968).

Przeworski, A. (1985). Capitalism and Social Democracy. Cambridge & New York: Cambridge University Press.

Ray, R. (1979). Change in Bengal Agrarian Society, c. 17601850. New Delhi: Manohar.

Reed, I.A. (2017). Chains of Power and Their Representation. Sociological Theory, 35(2), 87–117. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735275117709296

Reed, I.A. (2020). Power in Modernity: Agency Relations and the Creative Destruction of the King’s Two Bodies. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Richards, E. (1991). Scotland and the Uses of the Atlantic Empire. In B. Bailyn, & P.D. Morgan (Eds.), Strangers within the Realm: Cultural Margins of the First British Empire (pp. 67–114). Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.

Rocha, D. (2012). Implantation locale et relations clientélaires. Le cas du Parti des travailleurs à Brasilia. Cahiers des Amériques latines, 69, 123–140. https://doi.org/10.4000/cal.1012

Roniger, L. (1983). Modern Patron-Client Relations and Historical Clientelism: Some Clues from Ancient Republican Rome. European Journal of Sociology, 24(1), 63–95.

Roniger, L. (1990). Hierarchy and Trust in Modern Mexico and Brazil. New York: Praeger Publishers.

Roniger, L. (1994). Conclusions: The Transformation of Clientelism and Civil Society. In L. Roniger, & A. Gunes-Ayata (Eds.), Democracy, Clientelism, and Civil Society (pp. 207–214). Boulder: Lynne Rienner Publishers.

Rothstein, F. (1979). The Class Basis of Patron-Client Relations. Latin American Perspectives, 6(2), 25–35. https://doi.org/10.1177/0094582X7900600203

Sahlins, M. (1972). Stone Age Economics. Chicago: Aldine.

Saward, M. (2008). Representation and Democracy: Revisions and Possibilities. Sociology Compass, 2(3), 1000–1013. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9020.2008.00102.x

Schaffer, F.C., & Schedler, A. (2007). What is Vote Buying? In F.C. Schaffer (Ed.), Elections for Sale: The Causes and Consequences of Vote Buying (pp. 17–30). Boulder: Lynne Rienner Publishers.

Schmidt, S.W., Scott, J.C., Landé, C., & Guasti, L. (Eds.). (1977). Friends, Followers, and Factions: A Reader in Political Clientelism. Berkeley: University of California Press.

Scott, J.C. (1972). Patron-Client Politics and Political Change in Southeast Asia. American Political Science Review, 66(1), 91–113. https://doi.org/10.2307/1959280

Scott, J.C. (1977). Patronage or Exploitation? In E. Gellner, & J. Waterbury (Eds.), Patrons and Clients in Mediterranean Societies (pp. 21–39). London & Hanover: Duckworth & Center for Mediterranean Studies of the American Universities Field Staff.

Scott, J.C. (1990). Domination and the Arts of Resistance: Hidden Transcripts. New Haven: Yale University Press.

Shah, A. (2013). The Anti-politics of “Declarations of Dependence”. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 19(2), 254–255. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9655.12029

Shefner, J. (2001). Coalitions and Clientelism in Mexico. Theory and Society, 30(5), 593–628. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1013042708058

Shefner, J. (2008). The Illusion of Civil Society: Democratization and Community Mobilization in Low-income Mexico. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.

Shefner, J. (2012). What is Politics for? Inequality, Representation, and Needs Satisfaction Under Clientelism and Democracy. In T. Hilgers (Ed.), Clientelism in Everyday Latin American Politics (pp. 41–59). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

Silverman, S.F. (1965). Patronage and Community-Nation Relationships in Central Italy. Ethnology, 4(2), 172–189. https://doi.org/10.2307/3772728

Singelmann, P. (1981). Structures of Domination and Peasant Movements in Latin America. Columbia: University of Missouri Press.

Skotnicki, T., & Nielsen, K. (2021). Toward a Theory of Alienation: Futurelessness in Financial Capitalism. Theory and Society, 50(6), 837–865. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11186-021-09440-6

Stedman Jones, G. (1971). Outcast London: A Study in the Relationship between Classes in Victorian Society. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Stepan-Norris, J., & Zeitlin, M. (2003). Left Out: Reds and America’s Industrial Unions. Cambridge & New York: Cambridge University Press.

Stokes, S.C. (2005). Perverse Accountability: A Formal Model of Machine Politics with Evidence from Argentina. American Political Science Review, 99(3), 315–325. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055405051683

Stokes, S.C. (2011). Political Clientelism. In R.E. Goodin (Ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Political Science (pp. 648–674). New York: Oxford University Press.

Stokes, S.C., Dunning, T., Nazareno, M., & Brusco, V. (2013). Brokers, Voters, and Clientelism: The Puzzle of Distributive Politics. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Street, P. (1996). The Logic and Limits of “Plant Loyalty”: Black Workers, White Labor, and Corporate Racial Paternalism in Chicago’s Stockyards, 1916–1940. Journal of Social History, 29(3), 659–681. https://doi.org/10.1353/jsh/29.3.659

Szwarcberg, M. (2012). Uncertainty, Political Clientelism, and Voter Turnout in Latin America: Why Parties Conduct Rallies in Argentina. Comparative Politics, 45(1), 88–106. https://doi.org/10.2307/41714173

Szwarcberg, M. (2015). Mobilizing Poor Voters: Machine Politics, Clientelism, and Social Networks in Argentina. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Thomas, P.D. (2009). The Gramscian Moment: Philosophy, Hegemony and Marxism. Leiden & Boston: Brill.

Toral, G. (2024). How Patronage Delivers: Political Appointments, Bureaucratic Accountability, and Service Delivery in Brazil. American Journal of Political Science, 68(2), 797–815. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12758

Tuğal, C. (2009). Passive Revolution: Absorbing the Islamic Challenge to Capitalism. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

Wallerstein, I. (2004). World-systems Analysis: An Introduction. Durham & London: Duke University Press.

Wang, C-S., & Kurzman, C. (2007). Dilemmas of Electoral Clientelism: Taiwan, 1993. International Political Science Review, 28(2), 225–245. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192512107075408

Weber, M. (1978). Economy and Society: An Outline of Interpretive Sociology. Berkeley: University of California Press. (Original work published 1921).

Weingrod, A. (1968). Patrons, Patronage, and Political Parties. Comparative Studies in Society and History, 10(4), 377–400. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0010417500005004

Widlok, T. (2012). Virtue. In D. Fassin (Ed.), A Companion to Moral Anthropology (pp. 186–203). Hoboken: John Wiley and Sons.

Widlok, T. (2017). Anthropology and the Economy of Sharing. London & New York: Routledge.

Wiebe, P.D. (1975). Social Life in an Indian Slum. Durham: Carolina Academic Press.

Wilson, T.M. (1990). From Patronage to Brokerage in the Local Politics of Eastern Ireland. Ethnohistory, 37(2), 158–187. https://dx.doi.org/10.2307/482540

Young, K.A., Banerjee, T., & Schwartz, M. (2020). Levers of Power: How the 1% Rules and What the 99% Can Do about It. London & New York: Verso.

Zarazaga, R. (2014). Brokers Beyond Clientelism: A New Perspective Through the Argentine Case. Latin American Politics and Society, 56(3), 23–45. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1548-2456.2014.00238.x

Downloads

Published

2025-12-22

How to Cite

Newman, S. J. (2025). Social Theory and the Sociology of Clientelism: Groundwork for a Gramscian Alternative. Sociologica, 19(3), 207–241. https://doi.org/10.60923/issn.1971-8853/19189

Issue

Section

Essays