The Indeterminacy of Trust. A Response to Möllering and Esposito’s Commentaries
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.6092/issn.1971-8853/20491Keywords:
Trust, sociological theory, trust surveys, ethnomethodologyAbstract
We reply to Esposito and Möllering by clarifying what we meant by the procedure of “critical reconstruction”. It is not an external critique, because we have carefully followed the logic of trust research. But it is also not easily reconcilable with trust research, as Möllering argues, because we show that by doing so one is led to certain aporias, conundrums, and contradictions that do not permit leaving the concept as we found it. We reject any attempt to found the concept of trust in a theoretical constant such as complexity or irreducible uncertainty, and emphasize the need for an ethnomethodological approach that limits itself to how the actors themselves draw the distinctions between trust and blind faith, trust and mistrust, etc. This commitment is all the more necessary now, when trust research has become part of the very phenomenon it studies.
References
Brownlie, J., & Howson, A. (2005). “Leaps of Faith” and MMR: An Empirical Study of Trust. Sociology, 39(2), 221–239. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038505050
Esposito, E. (2024). The Dilemma of Trust in the Risk Society: Commentary on Gil Eyal, Larry Au and Cristian Capotescu’s “Trust is a Verb!”. Sociologica, 18(2), 193–198. https://doi.org/10.6092/issn.1971-8853/20108
Eyal, G., Au, L., & Capotescu, C. (2024). Trust is a Verb!: A Critical Reconstruction of the Sociological Theory of Trust. Sociologica, 18(2), 169–191. https://doi.org/10.6092/issn.1971-8853/19316
Giddens, A. (1990). The Consequences of Modernity. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
Lipsky, M. (1980). Street-Level Bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the Individual in Public Services. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
Luhmann, N. (1988). Familiarity, Confidence, Trust: Problems and Alternatives. In D. Gambetta (Ed.), Trust: Making and Breaking Cooperative Relationships (pp. 94–107). London: Blackwell.
Luhmann, N. (2017). Trust and Power (N. King, Trans.). Cambridge: Polity. (Original work published 1973)
Möllering, G. (2013). Process Views of Trusting and Crises. In R. Bachmann & A. Zaheer (Eds.), Handbook of Advances in Trust Research (pp. 285–305). Cheltenham: Elgar.
Möllering, G. (2024). Practice(s) of Trusting. Commentary on Gil Eyal, Larry Au and Cristian Capotescu’s “Trust is a Verb!”. Sociologica, 18(2), 199–208. https://doi.org/10.6092/issn.1971-8853/20450
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Gil Eyal, Larry Au, Cristian Capotescu
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
