Remote Working and Using the Services of the 15-Minute City. An Analytical Model Based on Data Collected in Milan

Authors

  • Giampaolo Nuvolati Department of Sociology and Social Research, University of Milano-Bicocca https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6403-3456
  • Anne-Iris Romens Department of Sociology and Social Research, University of Milano-Bicocca https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0860-4875

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.6092/issn.1971-8853/20720

Keywords:

15-Minute City, convenience services, neighbourhood, proximity, remote work

Abstract

The essay aims to explore the extent to which remote work fosters the 15-Minute City by increasing the use of local services. It proposes a model of analysis to study the impact of remote work on the use of services that focuses on two variables: a) the use of services in the neighbourhood; and b) the frequency with which workers perform their job remotely. Then, the contribution tests the model by referring to empirical data collected in the Milan area that consisted of a Survey developed in 2022, after the pandemic, with 285 remote workers of the quaternary sector. Our analysis highlights that remote work is mainly being performed at home and fosters the use of supply and leisure services in the neighbourhood, which ultimately encourages the development of the 15-Minute City. Although a high frequency of remote work relates to a higher propensity to use neighbourhood services, a significant group of full-time remote workers do not use services closer to their homes, which underlines the need to take into account other variables to understand the choice to use proximity services or not.

References

Bahri, M.T. & Widhyharto, D.S. (2021). Social Network Analysis (SNA) on #Kristengray Hashtag: Understanding Gentrification Side Effects behind the Digital Nomad Phenomenon. Jurnal Studi Pemuda, 10(1), 75–92. https://ssrn.com/abstract=4261464

Biagi, B., Ladu, M.G., & Meleddu, M. (2018). Urban Quality of Life and Capabilities: An Experimental Study. Ecological Economics, 150, 137–152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2018.04.011

Cetrulo, A., Guarascio, D., & Virgillito, M.E. (2020). The Privilege of Working from Home at the Time of Social Distancing. Intereconomics, 55(3), 142–147. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10272-020-0891-3

Chiaradia, F., Lelo, K., & Monni, S. (2023). La “Città dei 15 Minuti” tra Realtà e Leggende. economiaepolitica, 15(25), 1–10. https://www.economiaepolitica.it/_pdfs/pdf-14389.pdf

Chung, H. (2022). The Flexibility Paradox: Why Flexible Working Leads to (Self-)Exploitation. Bristol, UK: Policy Press.

Cocola-Gant, A., & Lopez-Gay, A. (2020). Transnational Gentrification, Tourism and the Formation of “Foreign Only” Enclaves in Barcelona. Urban Studies, 57(15), 3025–3043. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098020916111

Colleoni, M. (2024). Mobilité, immobilité et risque d’exclusion sociale. Proximité et accessibilité spatiale et sociale. In V. Kaufmann, L. Gwiazdzinski, C. Gall, & A. Torre (Eds.), Les nouvelles proximités (pp. 45–62). Limoges, FR: FYP Editions.

Council of Europe (2013). Living in Dignity in the 21st Century. Poverty and Inequality in Societies of Human Rights: The Paradox of Democracies. Council of Europe: Strasbourg.

Crippi, I. (2024). Lo Spazio Non è Neutro. Accessibilità, Disabilità, Abilismo. Naples, IT: Tamu.

Dedden, B., De Spiegelaere, S., & Hick, M. (2023). Remote Work: Ensuring Trade Union and Workers’ Rights through Collective Bargaining. In N. Countouris, V. De Stefano, A. Piasna, & S. Rainone (Eds.), The Future of Remote Work (pp. 127–145). Brussels, BE: European Trade Union Institute.

Donnelly, R., & Johns, J. (2021). Recontextualising Remote Working and Its HRM in the Digital Economy: An Integrated Framework for Theory and Practice. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 32(1), 84–105. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2020.1737834

Felstead, A. (2022). Remote Working: A Research Overview. London, UK: Routledge.

Florida, R., Rodríguez-Pose, A., & Storper, M. (2023). Critical Commentary: Cities in a Post-COVID World. Urban Studies, 60(8), 1509–1531. https://doi.org/10.1177/00420980211018072

Fried, J., & Hansson, D.H. (2013). Remote: Office Not Required. London, UK: Vermilion.

Gocer, O., Wei, Y., Torun, A.O., Alvanides, S., & Candido, C. (2023). Multidimensional Attributes of Neighbourhood Quality: A Systematic Review. Heliyon, 9(11), e22636. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e22636

Gokan, T., Kichko, S., Matheson, J., & Thisse, J.F. (2022). How the Rise of Teleworking Will Reshape Labor Markets and Cities. CESifo Working Paper No. 9952. Munich: Center for Economic Studies and ifo Institute (CESifo).

Hilbrecht M., Shaw S.M., Johnson L.C., & Andrey J. (2008). “I’m Home for the Kids”: Contradictory Implications for Work-life Balance of Teleworking Mothers. Gender, Work, & Organization, 15(5), 454–476. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0432.2008.00413.x

Huws, U., Korte, W.B., & Robinson, S. (1990). Telework. Towards the Elusive Office. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons.

Iannuzzi, F.E., & Campolongo, F. (2023). Transformed or Transferred? How Workers Perceive Managerial Control over Home Telework. Some Insights from an Italian Case. Relations industrielles/Industrial Relations, 78(1). https://doi.org/10.7202/1101313ar

INAPP. (2022). Rapporto Plus. Comprendere la Complessità del Lavoro. Istituto Nazionale per l’Analisi delle Politiche Pubbliche. https://www.inapp.gov.it/pubblicazioni/rapporto/edizioni-pubblicate/rapporto-inapp-2022

Irani, L. (2015). Difference and Dependence among Digital Workers: The Case of Amazon Mechanical Turk. South Atlantic Quarterly, 114(1), 225–234. https://doi.org/10.1215/00382876-2831665

ISFORT. (2022). 19° Rapporto sulla Mobilità degli Italiani. Principali Risultati, 12 December. https://www.isfort.it/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/19-Rapporto_mobilita_italiani_Sintesi.pdf

ISFORT. (2023). 20° Rapporto sulla Mobilità degli Italiani. Il Presente, il Passato, il Futuro, 27 November. https://www.isfort.it/wp-content/uploads/2023/12/RapportoMobilita2023_SintesiDef.pdf

ISTAT. (2022). Labour Force Survey. Continuous Survey on Labour Force: 2022 edition. Rome: Italian National Institute of Statistics. Retrieved from: https://www.istat.it/en/tag/labour-force

ISTAT. (2024). Rapporto Bes 2023. Il Benessere Equo e Sostenibile in Italia. Roma: Instituto Nazionale di Statistica. https://www.istat.it/produzione-editoriale/rapporto-bes-2023-il-benessere-equo-e-sostenibile-in-italia/

Kim, H., & Shimizu, C. (2022). The Relationship between Geographic Accessibility to Neighborhood Facilities, Remote Work, and Changes in Neighborhood Satisfaction after the Emergence of the COVID-19 Pandemic. Sustainability, 14(17), 10588. https://doi.org/10.3390/su141710588

Lucas, K. (2012). Transport and Social Exclusion: Where Are We Now? Transport Policy, 20, 105–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2012.01.013

Lucas, K. (2019). A New Evolution for Transport-Related Social Exclusion Research? Journal of Transport Geography, 81, 102529. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2019.102529

Manzini, E. (2021). Abitare la Prossimità. Idee per la Città dei 15 Minuti. Milan, IT: Egea.

Moreno, C. (2024). La Città dei 15 Minuti. Per una Cultura Urbana Democratica. Turin: Add Editore.

Moreno, C., Allam, Z., Chabaud, D., Gall, C., & Pratlong, F. (2021). Introducing the “15-Minute City”: Sustainability, Resilience and Place Identity in Future Post-pandemic Cities. Smart Cities, 4(1), 93–111. https://doi.org/10.3390/smartcities4010006

Municipality of Milan (2020). Strategia di Adattamento. Documento Aperto al Contributo della Città. https://www.comune.milano.it/documents/20126/95930101/Milano+2020.++Strategia+di+adattamento.pdf/c96c1297-f8ad-5482-859c-90de1d2b76cb?t=1587723749501

Nuvolati G. (2009). Quality of Life in Cities: A Question of Mobility and Accessibility. In V. Møller & D. Huschka (Eds.), Quality of Life and the Millennium Challenge (pp. 177–191). New York: Springer.

Nuvolati G. (2022), Qualità della Vita. In G. Nuvolati & M. D’Ovidio (Eds.), Temi e Metodi per la Sociologia del Territorio (pp. 191–209). Torino: Utet.

Piro, V. (2024). From Homework to Remote Work. Reflecting on the Porosity of Spaces, Times and Social Relationships at Home and in Workplaces. Rassegna Italiana di Sociologia, 65(1), 91–100. https://doi.org/10.1423/112993

Piro, V., Romens A.I., 6 Alberti, G. (2021). Lavoro da remoto e processi di sindacalizzazione. In M. Perruzzi & D. Sacchetto (Eds.), Il lavoro da remoto. Aspetti giuridici e sociologici (pp. 73–95). Torino: Giappichelli.

Pratt, J.H. (1984). Home Teleworking: A Study of Its Pioneers. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 25(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/0040-1625(84)90076-3

Redaelli, M., van Engen, M.L., & André, S. (2022). Perceived Covid-19-Crisis Intensity and Family Supportive Organizational Perceptions as Antecedents of Parental Burnout: A Study Conducted in Italy in March/April 2021 and 2022. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 1001076. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1001076

Romens, A.I. (2024). The Hybridisation of Employees’ Status through Remote Overwork: The Unions’ Perspective. Rassegna Italiana di Sociologia, 65(1), 101–126. https://dx.doi.org/10.1423/108612

Romens, A.I., Vincent, S., & Santos Menezes, P.C. (2024). Telework as a Childcare Policy: Mitigating or Increasing Gender and Class Inequalities?. Community, Work & Family, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/13668803.2024.2332220

Sen, A. (1993). Capabilities and Well-being. In M. Nussbaum & A. Sen (Eds.), The Quality of Life (pp. 30–53). Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press.

Sewell, G., & Taskin, L. (2015). Out of Sight, Out of Mind in a New World of Work? Autonomy, Control, and Spatiotemporal Scaling in Telework. Organization Studies, 36(11), 1507–1529. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840615593587

Sullivan, C. (2012). Remote Working and Work-life Balance. In N.P. Reilly, M.J. Sirgy, & C.A. Gorman (Eds.), Work and Quality of Life: Ethical Practices in Organizations (pp. 275–290). Dordrecht: Springer.

UN-Habitat (2020). UN-Habitat Guidance on COVID-19 and Public Space. United Nations Human Settlements Programme. https://unhabitat.org/sites/default/files/2020/06/un-habitat_guidance_on_covid-19_and_public_space.pdf

Verbeke, A., Schulz, R., Greidanus, N., & Hambley, L. (2008). Growing the Virtual Workplace: The Integrative Value Proposition for Telework. Cheltenham/Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.

Weiss, M. (2016). Digitalisation: Challenges and Perspectives for Labour Law. In A.M. Solana (Ed.), Nuevas tecnologías y nuevas maneras de trabajar: Estudios desde el derecho español y comparado. Alemania, Reino Unido, Polonia, Portugal y Argentina (pp. 22–31). Madrid: Dykinson.

Whittle, N. (2021). The 15-Minute City: Global Change Through Local Living. Edinburgh, UK: Luath Press.

Zarbo, R., Rosas D., Ferrero, G., & Magnano, P. (2021). Working at Home during the Covid-19 Pandemic: Impact on Quality of Working and Quality of Life. Psychology Hub, 38(3), 17–26. https://doi.org/10.13133/2724-2943/17588

Downloads

Published

2025-07-10

How to Cite

Nuvolati, G., & Romens, A.-I. (2025). Remote Working and Using the Services of the 15-Minute City. An Analytical Model Based on Data Collected in Milan. Sociologica, 19(2), 217–236. https://doi.org/10.6092/issn.1971-8853/20720

Issue

Section

Essays