We Would Not Be Here: Reproduction, Scholarship, and the Rise of Techno-authoritarianism
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.6092/issn.1971-8853/20743Keywords:
Democracy, Scholarship, Participation, Ideas, WomenAbstract
In this essay, I seek to braid together several ideas related to democracy, academic methodologies, and information technologies, all of which are being used as capital by tech billionaires, and, in partnership with institutions and government, being wielded as means of control. Currently, our reproductive rights are being stripped from us, threatening our very participation in scholarly life, and our students are terrified of authoritarianism at their doorstep. Scholarship has repeatedly shown that technologies are political, and in our current moment of inequality and rising authoritarianism, we should be wary of any promises of technological liberation. The academy, both in its research and teaching, is a pillar of democracy, and it is being threatened on many fronts. Rather than seeking technological solutions, I argue that our research should democratize the production of ideas by bringing in more voices to do the research and telling real human stories that haven’t yet been told.
References
Eirich, G.M., & Robinson, J.H. (2016). Does Earning More than Your Spouse Increase Your Financial Satisfaction? A Comparison of Men and Women in the United States, 1982–2012. Journal of Family Issues, 38(17), 2371–2399. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192513X16638384
Morris, T., Robinson, J.H., Spiller, K., & Gomez, A. (2023). “Screaming, ‘No! No!’ It Was Literally Like Being Raped”: Connecting Sexual Assault Trauma and Coerced Obstetrical Procedures. Social Problems, 70(1), 55–70. https://doi.org/10.1093/socpro/spab024
Robinson, J.H. (2020). What the Pregnancy Test Is Testing. The British Journal of Sociology, 71(3), 460–473. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-4446.12758
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Joan H. Robinson
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
