Feminist Theories of Agency and Emotion in Academia: A Feminist Historical Materialist Reading
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.6092/issn.1971-8853/20936Keywords:
Emotions, Materialism, Power, Feminist theory, AcademiaAbstract
Higher education, academic work, and gender relations in academia have, as a result of higher education reforms over the past three decades, become increasingly defined by capitalist logics and purposes. My empirical investigations of gender in academia for the past decade have, to a large extent, drawn on Institutional Ethnography, a method-of-inquiry developed by Marxist feminist sociologist, Dorothy Smith. This method-of-inquiry has largely oriented me towards the language-driven social coordination of academic work as this has been shaped in the context of academic capitalism and neoliberal higher education reforms. However, these explorations revealed complexities in the dynamics of compliance, buying into and resisting the social organisation of academia, which called for a theorisation of emotion. This essay, starting from an account of my historical materialist ontological and epistemological premises, explores and evaluates three approaches to agency and emotion: (1) Feminist Governmentality, (2) Feminist New Materialism, and (3) Feminist Practice Theory. I argue that a feminist practice theoretical conception of agency and emotion is most coherent with the historical materialist premises and the anti-ideological purposes of Institutional Ethnography.References
Aarseth, H. (2016). Eros in the Field? Bourdieu’s Double Account of Socialized Desire. The Sociological Review, 64(1), 93–109. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-954X.12348
Aarseth, H. (2022). The Implicit Epistemology of Metric Governance. New Conceptions of Motivational Tensions in the Corporate University. Critical Studies in Education, 63(5), 589–605. https://doi.org/10.1080/17508487.2022.2037680
Aarseth, H. (2024). Emotional Investments in Narrative Interviews. In S. Frosh, M. Vyrgioti, & J. Walsh (Eds.), The Palgrave Handbook of Psychosocial Studies. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-30366-1_52
Alaimo, S. & Hekman, S. (2008). Material Feminisms. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press. https://doi.org/10.2979/4326.0
Alvesson, M., Gabriel, Y., & Paulsen, R. (2017). Return to Meaning: A Social Science With Something to Say. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198787099.001.0001
Bannerji, H. (2020). The Ideological Condition: Selected Essays on History, Race and Gender. Leiden: Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004441620
Barca, S. (2019). Labour and the Ecological Crisis: The Eco-Modernist Dilemma In Western Marxism(s) (1970s–2000s). Geoforum, 98, 226–235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2017.07.011
Blackmore, J. (2022). Governing Knowledge in the Entrepreneurial University: A Feminist Account of Structural, Cultural and Political Epistemic Injustice. Critical Studies in Education, 63(5), 622–638. https://doi.org/10.1080/17508487.2020.1858912
Collini, S. (2012). What Are Universities For?. London, UK: Penguin.
Crossley, N. (2001). The Social Body: Habit, Identity and Desire. London, UK: SAGE. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446219867
de La Bellacasa, M.P. (2012). “Nothing Comes Without Its World”: Thinking With Care. The Sociological Review, 60(2), 197–216. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-954X.2012.02070.x
de La Bellacasa, M.P. (2017). Matters of Care: Speculative Ethics in More Than Human Worlds. Minneapolis, MI: University of Minnesota Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/S2753906700002096
Federici, S. (2020). Beyond the Periphery of the Skin: Rethinking, Remaking, and Reclaiming the Body in Contemporary Capitalism. Binghamton, NY: pm Press.
Fraser, N. (2014). Can Society Be Commodities All the Way Down? Post-Polanyian Reflections on the Capitalist Crisis. Economy and Society, 43(4), 541–558. https://doi.org/10.1080/03085147.2014.898822
Fraser, N. (2016). Contradictions of Capital and Care. New Left Review, 100(100), 99–117. https://newleftreview.org/issues/ii100/articles/nancy-fraser-contradictions-of-capital-and-care
Fraser, N. (2022). Cannibal Capitalism: How Our System is Devouring Democracy, Care, and the Planet and What We Can Do A bout It. New York City, NY: Verso Books.
Foster, J.B. (1999). Marx’s Theory of Metabolic Rift: Classical Foundations for Environmental Sociology. American Journal of Sociology, 105(2), 366–405. https://doi.org/10.1086/210315
Foucault, M. (1990) The History of Sexuality. New York City, NY: Vintage Books. Original work published 1978.
Foucault, M. (2007). Security, Territory, Population: Lectures at the Collège de France, 1977–1978. London, UK: Springer. Original work published 1978.
Gill, R. (2016). Breaking the Silence: The Hidden Injuries of the Neoliberal University. Feministische Studien, 34(1), 39–55. https://doi.org/10.1515/fs-2016-0105
Gunnarsson, L. (2013). The Naturalistic Turn in Feminist Theory: A Marxist-Realist Contribution. Feminist Theory, 14(1), 3–19. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464700112468567
Gunnarsson, L. (2016). The Dominant and Its Constitutive Other: Feminist Theorisations of Love, Power and Gendered Selves. Journal of Critical Realism, 15(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/14767430.2015.1136194
Haraway, D.J. (1988). Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective. Feminist Studies, 14(3), 575–599. https://www.jstor.org/stable/3178066
Haraway, D.J. (2016). Staying with the Trouble: Making Kin in the Chthulucene. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
Illouz, E. (2007). Cold Intimacies: The Making of Emotional Capitalism. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
Krüger, S., & Aarseth, H. (2025). The Debt of Privilege. Audit Culture, Universities, and the Depletion of Mental Space. Journal of Psychosocial Studies, 18(1), 5–21. https://doi.org/10.1332/14786737Y2025D000000040
Leys, R. (2011). The Turn to Affect: A Critique. Critical Inquiry, 37(3), 434–472. https://doi.org/10.1086/659353
Loewald, H. (1980). Papers on Psychoanalysis. New Haven, CO: Yale University Press.
Lund, R. (2012). Publishing to Become an “Ideal Academic”: An Institutional Ethnography and a Feminist Critique. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 28(3), 218–228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scaman.2012.05.003
Lund, R. (2018). The Social Organisation of Boasting in the Neoliberal University. Gender and Education, 32(4), 466–485. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540253.2018.1482412
Lund, R. (2020). Becoming a Professor Requires Saying “No”: Merging Equality and Quality Agendas in a Norwegian Gender Balance Project. In H. Lawton Smith, C. Henry, H. Etzkowitz, & A. Poulovassilis (Eds.), Gender, Science and Innovation (pp. 35–57). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781786438973.00010
Lund, R.W.B. (2023). Retrieving Materialism: The Continued Relevance of Dorothy Smith. Sociological Theory, 41(4), 301–313. https://doi.org/10.1177/07352751231198129
Lund, R., Blackmore, J., & Rowlands, J. (Eds.). (2024). Epistemic Injustice: Governing Research Practice Within Academic Knowledge Production. London, UK: Taylor & Francis. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003536116
Lund, R., & Tienari, J. (2019). Passion, Care, and Eros in the Gendered Neoliberal University. Organisation, 26(1), 98–121. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350508418805283
Marginson, S. (2025). Problems of the Public Good in Higher Education: Building the Common Amid Sovereign Individualism, Capital and the State. High Education, 89, 29–52. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-024-01341-8
McCoy, L. (2021). Materialist Matters: A Case for Revisiting the Social Ontology of Institutional Ethnography. In P.C. Luken & S. Vaughan (Eds.), The Palgrave Handbook of Institutional Ethnography (pp. 35–46). Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-54222-1_3
McNay, L. (1991). The Foucauldian Body and the Exclusion of Experience. Hypatia, 6(3), 125–139. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1527-2001.1991.tb00259.x
McNay, L. (1992). Foucault and Feminism (1st ed.). Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
Merleau‑Ponty, M. (1962). Phenomenology of Perception. (Translated by C. Smith). London, UK: Routledge & Kegan Paul; New York, NY: Humanities Press.
Moi, T. (2017). Revolution of the Ordinary: Literary Studies after Wittgenstein, Austin, and Cavell. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
O’Neill, M. (2014). The Slow University: Work, Time, and Well-Being. Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 15(3). https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-15.3.2226
Rekret, P. (2016). A Critique of New Materialism: Ethics and Ontology. Subjectivity, 9(3), 225–245. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41286-016-0001-y
Rosa, H. (2019). Resonance. A Sociology of Our Relationship to the World. Cambridge, UK: Policy Press.
Salleh, A. (2010). From Metabolic Rift to “Metabolic Value”: Reflections on Environmental Sociology and the Alternative Globalization Movement. Organization & Environment, 23(2), 205–219. https://doi.org/10.1177/1086026610372134
Shore, C. (2008). Audit Culture and Illiberal Governance: Universities and the Politics of Accountability. Anthropological Theory, 8(3), 278–298. https://doi.org/10.1177/1463499608093815
Slaughter, S., & Rhoades, G. (2004). Academic Capitalism and the New Economy: Markets, State, and Higher Education. Baltimore, MD: JHU Press.
Smith, D.E. (1987). The Everyday World as Problematic: A Feminist Sociology. Boston, MA: North Eastern University Press.
Smith, D.E. (1990). The Conceptual Practices of Power: A Feminist Sociology of Knowledge. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
Smith, D.E. (1999). Writing the Social: Critique, Theory, and Investigations.. Toronto: University of Toronto Press. https://doi.org/10.3138/9781442683747
Smith, D.E. (2004). Ideology, Science and Social Relations: A Reinterpretation of Marx’s Epistemology. European Journal of Social Theory, 7(4), 445–462. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368431004046702
Smith, D.E. (2005). Institutional Ethnography: A Sociology for People. Lanham, MD: AltaMira Press.
Staunæs, D., & Brøgger, K. (2020). In the Mood of Data and Measurements: Experiments as Affirmative Critique, or How to Curate Academic Value With Care. Feminist Theory, 21(4), 429–445. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464700120967301
Tronto, J.C. (1993). Moral Boundaries: A Political Argument for an Ethic of Care. New York, NY: Routledge.
Walby, K. (2007). On the Social Relations of Research: A Critical Assessment of Institutional Ethnography. Qualitative Inquiry, 13(7), 1008–1030. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800407305809
Wetherell, M. (2012). Affect and Emotion: A New Social Science Understanding. London, UK: Sage Publications Ltd.
Whitebook, J. (1999). Freud, Foucault and “The Dialogue with Unreason”. Philosophy & Social Criticism, 25(6), 29–66. https://doi.org/10.1177/019145379902500602
Wright, S. (2016). Universities in a Knowledge Economy or Ecology? Policy, Contestation and Abjection. Critical Policy Studies, 10(1), 59–78. https://doi.org/10.1080/19460171.2016.1142457
Wright, S., & Shore, C. (Eds.). (2017). Death of the Public University? Uncertain Futures for Higher Education in the Knowledge Economy. New York City, NY: Berghahn Books. https://doi.org/10.3167/9781785335426
Ylijoki, O.H., & Mäntylä, H. (2003). Conflicting Time Perspectives in Academic Work. Time & Society, 12(1), 55–78. https://doi.org/10.1177/0961463X03012001364
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Rebecca Lund
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
