Can Democracy Survive AI?

Authors

  • Gina Neff Queen Mary University London; Minderoo Centre for Technology & Democracy, University of Cambridge https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9090-924X

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.6092/issn.1971-8853/21108

Keywords:

AI, Science and Technology Studies, Economic Sociology, technology, theory

Abstract

This essay examines the fundamental tension between artificial intelligence technologies and democratic governance, arguing that AI’s inherent tendencies toward centralization and control pose significant challenges to democratic societies. Drawing on science and technology studies and critical analyses of technological politics, I argue that current AI implementations embody four key anti-democratic characteristics: they represent powerful technologies of centralization and control; they fuel ideologies of unchecked economic growth; they prioritize efficiency over accountability; and they enable absolute control coupled with unaccountable power. The analysis synthesizes historical parallels between computing and control, contemporary developments in AI infrastructure, and emerging policy frameworks to demonstrate how AI’s technical architecture and commercial implementation systematically undermine democratic values of transparency, accountability, and public participation. Through examination of recent political developments and corporate practices, the essay reveals how AI’s centralization of power and erosion of public oversight threaten democratic institutions. I conclude that democracy’s survival in an AI-driven future depends on reimagining and rebuilding digital technologies with democratic accountability at their core, requiring new frameworks for public oversight and corporate governance.

References

Bowles, S., & Gintis, H. (1993). A Political and Economic Case for the Democratic Enterprise. Economics and Philosophy, 9(1), 75–100. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266267100005125

Center on Organizational Innovation (COI). Who We Are. https://coi.sociology.columbia.edu/content/who-we-are (Accessed January 1, 2025).

Caro, R.A. (1974). The Power Broker. Robert Moses and the Fall of New York. New York: Knopf Doubleday Publishing Group.

Crawford, K. (2017). Dark Days: AI and the Rise of Fascism. Austin, TX: SXSW. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Dlr4O1aEJvI (Accessed January 1, 2025).

Fields-Meyer, A., & Haven, J. (2024). AI’s Alarming Trend to Illiberalism. Foreign Policy, October 31. https://foreignpolicy.com/2024/10/31/artificial-intelligence-ai-illiberalism-democracy-civil-rights/ (Accessed January 1, 2025).

Gray, M.L., & Suri, S. (2019). Ghost Work: How to Stop Silicon Valley from Building a New Global Underclass. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.

McQuillan, D. (2022). Resisting AI: An Anti-fascist Approach to Artificial Intelligence. Bristol, UK: Bristol University Press.

Neff, G. (2012). Venture Labor: Work and the Burden of Risk in Innovative Industries. Cambridge, US: MIT Press.

Neff, G., McGrath, M. & Prakash, N. (2020). AI@Work. Oxford Internet Institute and the Minderoo Foundation. https://www.oii.ox.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/AI-at-Work-2020-Accessible-version.pdf (Accessed January 1, 2025).

Neff, G., & Stark, D. (2004). Permanently Beta: Responsive Organization in the Internet Era. In P.N. Howard & S. Jones (Eds.), Society Online: The Internet in Context (pp. 173—188). London: Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452229560

Neff, G., Wissinger, E., & Zukin, S. (2005). Entrepreneurial Labor among Cultural Producers: “Cool” Jobs in “Hot” Industries. Social Semiotics, 15(3), 307–334. https://doi.org/10.1080/10350330500310111

Radiya-Dixit, E., & Neff, G. (2023). A Sociotechnical Audit: Assessing Police Use of Facial Recognition. FAccT '23: Proceedings of the 2023 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (pp. 1334–1346). New York, NY: Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3593013.3594084

Schaake, M. (2024). The Tech Coup: How to Save Democracy from Silicon Valley. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9780691241180

Starosielski, N. (2015). The Undersea Network. Durham, US: Duke University Press. https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822376224

Trades Union Congress. (2024). The AI Bill Project, April 18. https://www.tuc.org.uk/research-analysis/reports/ai-bill-project (Accessed January 1, 2025).

UK Government. (2025). AI Opportunities Action Plan, January 13. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/ai-opportunities-action-plan/ai-opportunities-action-plan (Accessed January 14, 2025).

Washington Post Live. (2024). Transcript: The Futurist London: The New Age of AI. The Washington Post, October 9. https://www.washingtonpost.com/washington-post-live/2024/10/09/transcript-futurist-london-new-age-ai/ (Accessed January 1, 2025).

The White House. (2022). Blueprint for an AI Bill of Rights. https://www.whitehouse.gov/ostp/ai-bill-of-rights/ (Accessed January 1, 2025).

The White House. (2023). Executive Order on the Safe, Secure, and Trustworthy Development and Use of Artificial Intelligence. Briefing Room, October 30, 2023. https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/presidential-actions/2023/10/30/executive-order-on-the-safe-secure-and-trustworthy-development-and-use-of-artificial-intelligence/ (Accessed January 1, 2025).

Winner, L. (1980). Do Artifacts Have Politics? Daedalus, 109(1), 121–136. http://www.jstor.org/stable/20024652

Downloads

Published

2025-01-22

How to Cite

Neff, G. (2024). Can Democracy Survive AI?. Sociologica, 18(3), 137–146. https://doi.org/10.6092/issn.1971-8853/21108

Issue

Section

Focus