Democratic Dissonance: Observing and Accounting by Volunteer Election Officials in Hungary
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.6092/issn.1971-8853/21490Keywords:
accountability, democracy, observation, participant observation, Election fraudAbstract
We reflect on the ability of democratic institutions to provide accountability, and on the relevance of that accountability. We discuss the democratic observation technology of the election official role in the 2022 Hungarian elections, where a social movement of volunteers served to fill these posts on behalf of the beleaguered opposition. A public scandal ensued after the social media sharing of volunteers' accounts. We reflect on the relationship between first-order and second-order observation, and we show the ethnographic aspect of these accounts and the shifting accountability relations in this dynamic. We conclude with provocations about the problem of managing dissonance through existing democratic institutions.
References
Antal, A.B., Hutter, M., & Stark, D. (Eds.). (2015). Moments of Valuation: Exploring Sites of Dissonance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Dányi, E. (2017). Politics beyond Words: Ethnography of Political Institutions. In R. Wodak & B. Forchtner (Eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Language and Politics (pp. 291–306). London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315183718-22
Esposito, E. (2013). Economic Circularities and Second-Order Observation: The Reality of Ratings. Sociologica, 7(2), 1–10. https://doi.org10.2383/74851
Esposito, E., & Stark, D. (2019). What’s Observed in a Rating? Rankings as Orientation in the Face of Uncertainty. Theory, Culture and Society, 36(4), 3–26. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276419826276
Garfinkel, H. (1967). Studies in Ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Györke, M., & Vargha, Z. (2022). From Counting to Giving Account: Citizens Auditing the 2022 Hungarian Parliamentary Elections. ESCP Impact Papers, 3, 188–197.
Mares, I., & Young, L. (2019). Varieties of Clientelism in Hungarian Elections. Comparative Politics, 51(3), 449–471. https://doi.org/10.5129/001041519X15647434969911
Moynihan, D. (2022), Delegitimization, Deconstruction and Control: Undermining the Administrative State. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 699(1), 36–49. https://doi.org/10.1177/00027162211069723
Muniesa, F., Millo, Y., & Callon, M. (2007). An Introduction to Market Devices. The Sociological Review, 55(2_suppl), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-954X.2007.00727.x
Power, M. (1997), The Audit Society: Rituals of Verification. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Preda, A. (2009). Framing Finance: The Boundaries of Markets and Modern Capitalism. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Smith, D. (2025). “In a real sense, US democracy has died”: How Trump is Emulating Hungary’s Orbán. The Guardian, February 7. https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/feb/07/trump-viktor-orban-electoral-autocracy
European Parliament (2022). MEPs: Hungary Can No Longer Be Considered a Full Democracy. Press Release, September 15. https://www.europarl.europa.eu/news/en/press-room/20220909IPR40137/meps-hungary-can-no-longer-be-considered-a-full-democracy
Stark, D. (2009). The Sense of Dissonance: Accounts of Worth in Economic Life. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Stark, D. (2013). Observing Finance as a Network of Observations. Sociologica, 7(2), 21–25. https://doi.org/10.2383/74854
Wong, M. (2024). “Stop counting votes, or we’re going to murder your children”. Election Officials are Under Siege. The Atlantic, October 25. https://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2024/10/election-workers-threats-trump/680362/
Yates, J. (1993). Control Through Communication: The Rise of System in American Management. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Zsuzsanna Vargha, Mariann Györke
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
