We are Many: A Structural Critique of Partisan Identities (and Identity Politics)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.6092/issn.1971-8853/21583Keywords:
Harrison White, Identity and Control, Political partisanship, Polarization, Psychological reductionismAbstract
Harrison White’s reconceptualization of identity as dynamic, relational, and contingent outcome of social interaction and struggles for control offers a powerful alternative to the static, essentialist concept of identity that dominates contemporary social science. Building on White’s network-based framework, this article advances a structuralist critique of identity-based explanations — particularly the framing of partisanship as a “mega-identity”. It challenges the reification of partisanship by advancing three central critiques: (1) individuals are routinely reduced to a singular political identity, ignoring the multiplicity and contradictions of real-world affiliations; (2) statistical and survey-based measures of partisanship impose binary classifications (Republicans vs. Democrats) that obscure the heterogeneity and ambivalence in citizens’ political orientations, and (3) these simplifications fuel “us vs. them” psychological reductionism, where partisan identities are tautologically invoked to explain the very behaviors they help construct. Lab-based studies, in particular, overstate partisan divisions by prompting responses to caricatured identities, neglecting the pluralistic and relational nature of social life. Grounding identity in social networks and structural context, the essay calls for a more nuanced understanding of political behavior — one that recognizes the multiplex nature of affiliation and the role of elite polarization in democratic backsliding. Rather than blaming voters, the analysis highlights how elite-driven simplifications of identity distort representation and undermine the pluralist foundations of a democratic society.
References
Baldassarri, D. (2018). Keeping One’s Distance: Truth and Ambiguity in Social Research. Sociologica, 12(1), 5–11. https://doi.org/10.6092/issn.1971-8853/8332
Baldassarri, D., & Abascal, M. (2020). Diversity and Prosocial Behavior. Science, 369(6508), 1183–1187. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abb2432
Baldassarri, D., & Bearman, P. (2007). Dynamics of Political Polarization. American Sociological Review, 72, 784–811. https://www.jstor.org/stable/25472492
Baldassarri, D., & Goldberg, A. (2014). Neither Ideologues, nor Agnostics: Alternative Voters’ Belief System in an Age of Partisan Politics. American Journal of Sociology, 120(1), 45–95. https://doi.org/10.1086/676042
Baldassarri, D., & Park, B. (2020). Was There a Culture War? Polarization and Secular Trends in U.S. Public Opinion. Journal of Politics, 82(3), 809–827. https://doi.org/10.1086/707306
Bartels, L.M. (2016). Unequal Democracy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Bearman, P. (1993). Relations into Rhetorics: Local Elite Social Structure in Norfolk, England, 1540–1640. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
Bendle, M.F. (2002). The Crisis of “Identity” in High Modernity. British Journal of Sociology, 53(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/00071310120109302
Blau, P.M. (1977). Inequality and Heterogeneity: A Primitive Theory of Social Structure. New York, NY: Free Press.
Cavafy, C.P. (1975). Waiting for the Barbarians. In G. Savidis (Ed.), C.P. Cavafy: Collected Poems. (Translated by E. Keeley & P. Sherrard). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. (Original work published 1904).
Coleman, J.S. (1958). Relational Analysis: The Study of Social Organizations with Survey Methods. Human Organization, 17, 28–36. http://www.jstor.org/stable/44124097
Dahl, R. (1961). Who Governs? Democracy and Power in an American City. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
de Jong, J., & Baldassarri, D. (2025). Avoiding the Other Side? The Limited Role of Partisanship in the Formation of Social Relationships in the United States. [Working paper].
Fowler, A., Hill, S.J., Lewis, J.B., Tausanovitch, C., Vavreck, L., & Warshaw, C. (2023). Moderates. American Political Science Review, 117(2), 643–660. https://doi:10.1017/S0003055422000818
Gilens, M. (2012). Affluence and Influence: Economic Inequality and Political Power in America. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Gould, R.V. (1995). Insurgent Identities: Class, Community, and Protest in Paris from 1848 to the Commune. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Hedström, P. (2005). Dissecting the Social: On the Principles of Analytical Sociology. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Hillygus, D.S., & Shields, T.G. (2008). The Persuadable Voter: Wedge Issues in Presidential Campaigns. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Iyengar, S., Lelkes, Y., Levendusky, M., Malhotra, N., & Westwood, S.J. (2019). The Origins and Consequences of Affective Polarization in the United States. Annual Review of Political Science, 22(1), 129–146. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-051117-073034
Kang, S.K., & Bodenhausen, G.V. (2015). Multiple Identities in Social Perception and Interaction: Challenges and Opportunities. Annual Review of Psychology, 66(1), 547–574. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010814-015025
Kinder, D.R., & Kalmoe, N.P. (2017). Neither Liberal nor Conservative: Ideological Innocence in the American Public. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Klar, S., & Krupnikov, Y. (2016). Independent politics: How American Disdain for Parties Leads to Political Inaction. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Klar, S., Krupnikov, Y., & Ryan, J.B. (2018). Affective Polarization or Partisan Disdain? Untangling a Dislike for the Opposing Party from a Dislike of Partisanship. Public Opinion Quarterly, 82(2), 379–390. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfy014
Klein, E. (2020). Why We’re Polarized. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster.
Lee, B., & Bearman, P. (2020). Political isolation in America. Network Science, 8(3), 333–355. https://doi.org/10.1017/nws.2020.9
Leifer, E.M. (1988). Interaction Preludes to Role Setting: Exploratory Local Action. American Sociological Review, 53(6), 865–878. https://doi.org/10.2307/2095896
Lelkes, Y. (2016). Mass Polarization: Manifestations and Measurements. Public Opinion Quarterly, 80(S1), 392–410. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfw005
Levendusky, M. (2009). The Partisan Sort: How Liberals Became Democrats and Conservatives Became Republicans. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Lipset, S.M., & Rokkan, S. (1967). Party Systems and Voter Alignments: Cross-National Perspectives. New York, NY: Free Press.
Mason, L. (2018). Uncivil Agreement: How Politics Became Our Identity. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
McCarty, N. (2019). Polarization: What Everyone Needs to Know. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
McCarty, N., Poole, K., & Rosenthal, H. (2016). Polarized America: The Dance of Ideology and Unequal Riches. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Merton, R.K. (1957). Social Theory and Social Structure. New York, NY: Free Press.
Minozzi, W., Song, H., Lazer, D.M.J., Neblo, M.A., & Ognyanova, K. (2020). The Incidental Pundit: Who Talks Politics with Whom, and Why?. American Journal of Political Science, 64(1), 135–151. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12469
Padgett, J.F., & Ansell, C.K. (1993). Robust Action and the Rise of the Medici, 1400–1434. American Journal of Sociology, 98(6), 1259–1319. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2781822
Park, B. (2018). How Are We Apart? Continuity and Change in the Structure of Ideological Disagreement in the American Public, 1980–2012. Social Forces, 96(4), 1757–1784. https://doi.org/10.1093/sf/sox093
Park, B., & Baldassarri, D. (2025). The Social Bases of Partisanship. Cleavage Structures and Intersectional Bases. [Manuscript under review]. Department of Sociology, New York University.
Perrett, S., & Baldassarri, D. (2025). Independents and Moderates Informational Priorities. [Manuscript under review]. Department of Sociology, New York University.
Portes, A. (1998). Social Capital: Its Origins and Applications in Modern Sociology. Annual Review of Sociology, 24, 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.24.1.1
Sherif, M. (1956). Experiments in Group Conflict. Scientific American, 195(5), 54–59. https://www.jstor.org/stable/24941808
Simmel G. (1950). The Stranger. In K.H. Wolff (Ed.), The Sociology of Georg Simmel (pp. 402–406). Glencoe, IL: The Free Press.
Simmel, G. (1955). Conflict and the Web of Group Affiliations. New York, NY: Free Press. (Original work published 1908 & 1922).
Simmel, G. (1971). On Individuality and Social Forms (D.N. Levine, Ed.). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Tajfel, H., Billig, M.G., Bundy, R.P., & Flament, C. (1971). Social Categorization and Intergroup Behaviour. European Journal of Social Psychology, 1(2), 149–178. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2420010202
Thoits, P.A. (1983). Multiple Identities and Psychological Well-Being: A Reformulation and Test of the Social Isolation Hypothesis. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 174–187. https://doi.org/10.2307/2095103
White, H.C. (1972). Do Networks Matter? Notes for Camden. [Unpublished conference notes for Do Networks Matter?]. Camden, ME: Mathematical Sciences Board.
White, H.C. (1992). Identity and Control: A Structural Theory of Social Action. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
White, H.C. (2008). Identity and Control: How Social Formations Emerge (2nd ed.). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
White, H.C., Boorman, S.A., & Breiger, R.L. (1976). Social Structure from Multiple Networks. I. Blockmodels of Roles and Positions. American Journal of Sociology, 81(4), 730–780. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2777596
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Delia Baldassarri
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
