Talk, Ties, and Social Times: Unpacking the Duality of Networks and Futures
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.6092/issn.1971-8853/21585Keywords:
Networks, futures, publics, temporality, conversationAbstract
How is talk about what will, could, and should happen in the future shaped by networks of actors engaged in these conversations? And how do conversations about imagined futures reshape social relations? This essay considers the roots of my current research on “the duality of networks and futures” in seminars and conversations with Harrison White at Columbia in the 1990s. First, I recount generative exchanges with White on language, interaction, and publics, focusing on how “social times” are developed through switches between “network-domains”. Second, I describe how these ideas inform my current work on the construction of futures in public interest scenario projects, as examples of intentional and focused “sites of hyperprojectivity”. As a historical example, I explore intensive debates about imagined futures in the Kenya at the Crossroads project in 1998–2000. Finally, I share some preliminary mappings of transnational networks of public interest scenario projects, based on an original dataset of 230+ multi-stakeholder foresight exercises conducted worldwide since the 1990s. This analysis attempts to channel White’s theoretical and methodological insights by formalizing the link between cultural and relational processes at a larger scale.
References
Andersson, J. (2018). The Future of the World: Futurology, Futurists, and the Struggle for the Post Cold War Imagination. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198814337.001.0001
Andersson, J. & Keizer, A.-G. (2014). Governing the Future: Science, Policy and Public Participation in the Construction of the Long Term in the Netherlands and Sweden. History and Technology, 30(1–2), 104–122. https://doi.org/10.1080/07341512.2014.932563
Breiger, R.L. (1974). The Duality of Persons and Groups. Social Forces, 53(2), 181–190. https://doi.org/10.2307/2576011
Breiger, R.L. (2000). A Tool Kit for Practice Theory. Poetics, 27(2–3), 91–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-422X(99)00026-1
Emirbayer, M., & Mische, A. (1998). What Is Agency? American Journal of Sociology, 103(4), 962–1023. https://doi.org/10.1086/231294
Finlev, T. (2012). Future Peace: Breaking Cycles of Violence through Futures Thinking. Journal of Futures Studies, 16(3), 47–62. https://jfsdigital.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/163-A03.pdf.pdf
Fosbrook, B. (2017). How Scenarios Became Corporate Strategies: Alternative Futures and Uncertainty in Strategic Management. [Doctoral dissertation, York University]. https://yorkspace.library.yorku.ca/server/api/core/bitstreams/3ab1ffd2-0ddd-47dc-ab1e-1809b2f61094/content
Fraser, N. (1992). Rethinking the Public Sphere: A Contribution to the Critique of Actually Existing Democracy. In C. Calhoun (Ed.), Habermas and the Public Sphere (pp. 109–142). Cambridge, MA/London: MIT Press.
Fruchterman, T.M.J., & Reingold, E.M. (1991). Graph Drawing by Force-Directed Placement. Software, 21(11), 1129–1164. https://doi.org/10.1002/spe.4380211102
Gibson, D.R. (2012). Talk at the Brink: Deliberation and Decision During the Cuban Missile Crisis. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.23943/princeton/9780691151311.001.0001
Habermas, J. (1962). Strukturwandel der Öffentlichkeit. Untersuchungen zu einer Kategorie der bürgerlichen Gesellschaft. Darmstadt/Neuwied: Luchterhand.
van der Heijden, K. (2005). Scenarios: The Art of Strategic Conversation (2nd ed.). West Sussex: Wiley.
Janzwood, S., & Piereder, J. (2019). “Mainstreaming” Foresight Program Development in the Public Sector. Foresight, 21(5), 605–624. https://doi.org/10.1108/FS-11-2018-0093
Kahane, A. (2012). Transformative Scenario Planning: Working Together to Change the Future. San Francisco, CA: Berrett-Koehler Publishers.
Lakoff, A. (2017). Unprepared: Global Health in a Time of Emergency. Oakland, CA: University of California Press. https://doi.org/10.1525/9780520968417
Lee, C.W. (2014). Do-It-Yourself Democracy: The Rise of the Public Engagement Industry. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199987269.001.0001
Lee, C.W., McQuarrie, M., & Walker, E.T. (2015). Democratizing Inequalities: Dilemmas of the New Public Participation. New York, NY: NYU Press. https://doi.org/10.18574/nyu/9781479880607.001.0001
Leifer, E.M. (1988). Interaction Preludes to Role Setting: Exploratory Local Action. American Sociological Review, 53(6), 865–878. https://doi.org/10.2307/2095896
Maina, B., & Sivi, K. (2004). Kenya: Sharing the News. Development, 47(4), 82–86. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.development.1100075
Mische, A. (2008). Partisan Publics: Communication and Contention across Brazilian Youth Activist Networks. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400830817
Mische, A. (2009). Projects and Possibilities: Researching Futures in Action. Sociological Forum, 24(3), 694–704. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1573-7861.2009.01127.x
Mische, A. (2011). Relational Sociology, Culture, and Agency. In J. Scott & P. Carrington (Eds.), The Sage Handbook of Social Network Analysis (pp. 80–97). London, UK: Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446294413.n7
Mische, A. (2014). Measuring Futures in Action: Projective Grammars in the Rio+20 Debates. Theory and Society, 43(3–4), 437–464. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11186-014-9226-3
Mische, A. (2015). Partisan Performance: The Relational Construction of Brazilian Youth Activist Publics. In F. Rossi & M. von Bulow (Eds.), Social Movement Dynamics. New Perspectives on Theory and Research from Latin America (pp. 430–471). Surrey, UK: Ashgate Publications.
Mische, A., & Chandler, M. (2019). Narratives, Networks and Publics. In L. Grindstaff, M.-C.M. Lo, & J.R. Hall (Eds.), Routledge Handbook of Cultural Sociology (2nd ed.) (pp. 478–487). Abingdon/New York, NY: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315267784-51
Mische, A., & Mart, Ş.G. (2025). Imagined Interventions: Critical-Ideational Strategies across Multiple Futures in Public Interest Scenarios. Time & Society, 34(1), 77–105. https://doi.org/10.1177/0961463X241310564
Mische, A., & White, H. (1998). Between Conversation and Situation: Public Switching Dynamics across Network Domains. Social Research, 65(3), 695–724. http://www.jstor.org/stable/40971267
Mohr, J.W., Bail, C.A., Frye, M., Lena, J.C., Lizardo, O., McDonnell, T.E., Mische, A., Tavory, I., & Wherry, F.F. (2020). Measuring Culture. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
Ramírez, R., & Wilkinson, A. (2014). Rethinking the 2×2 Scenario Method: Grid or Frames? Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 86, 254–264. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2013.10.020
Ramírez, R., & Wilkinson, A. (2016). Strategic Reframing: The Oxford Scenario Planning Approach. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198745693.001.0001
Scearce, D., & Fulton, K. (2004). What If? The Art of Scenario Thinking for Nonprofits. Emeryville, CA: Global Business Network.
Schwartz, P. (1996). The Art of the Long View: Planning for the Future in an Uncertain World. New York, NY: Doubleday.
Sivi, K., Gitau, M.J., & Mue, N. (2006). Without a Vision! The Future Search, Institute of Economic Affairs, September 2006.
Wack, P. (1985a). Scenarios: Shooting the Rapids. Harvard Business Review, 63(6), 139–150.
Wack, P. (1985b). Scenarios: Uncharted Waters Ahead. Harvard Business Review, 63(5), 73–89.
White, H.C. (1992). Identity and Control: A Structural Theory of Social Action. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
White, H.C. (1995). Network Switchings and Bayesian Forks: Reconstructing the Social and Behavioral Sciences. Social Research, 62(4), 1035–1063.
White, H.C. (2008). Identity and Control: How Social Formations Emerge (2nd ed.). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Wilkinson, A., & Kupers, R. (2014). The Essence of Scenarios: Learning from the Shell Experience. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt6wp7mz
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Ann Mische
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
