The Tensions of Academic Freedom as a Practice in the 21st Century
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.60923/issn.1971-8853/22908Keywords:
Academic freedom, Basic science, Regulatory science, Expertise, UniversitiesAbstract
Academic freedom is currently under attack in the United States. I analyze the different forms this attack has taken — on regulatory science, on basic science, on the universities, and argue that they reveal that academic freedom is not one thing, but a complex set of practices, which are not always in concord with one another. Indeed, one of the main lines of attack has been to leverage one form of academic freedom — the relative autonomy of basic scientists to define what lines of research are worthy of funding — against another, namely the freedom of academics to study and teach even controversial topics. I offer a brief history of the relative autonomy of basic science and argue that it needs to be rethought. The second part of the paper looks at attempts to define academic freedom by distinguishing it clearly from freedom of expression in the public sphere. I argue that this neat separation — which harks back to Max Weber’s “Science as a Vocation” — is hard to maintain in the 21st century, when expertise is contested, and social media blurs the line between the lecture hall and the public sphere. Practicing academic freedom now requires adapting our practices to 21st-century realities.
References
Akrich, M., & Rabeharisoa, V. (2023). On the Multiplicity of Lay Expertise: An Empirical and Analytical Overview of Patients Associations’ Achievements and Challenges. In G. Eyal & T. Medvetz (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Expertise and Democratic Politics (pp. 103–133). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
B’Tselem. (2023). Parched: Israel’s Policy of Water Deprivation in the West Bank. https://www.btselem.org/publications/202305_parched.
Bearman, P. (2025). Polarization Dynamics and Our Fragile Political Experiment. Talk given at The University of Richmond, Richmond, VA.
Bourdieu, P. (1984). Homo Academicus. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Bush, V. (2020). Science: The Endless Frontier. Washington, DC: The National Science Foundation. (Original work published 1945).
Campa, R. (2008). Making Science by Serendipity? A Review of Robert K. Merton and Elinor Barber’s The Travels and Adventures of Serendipity. Journal of Evolution and Technology, 17(1), 75–83. https://jetpress.org/v17/campa.htm.
Collins, H. (1985). Changing Order: Replication and Induction in Scientific Practice. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Collins, H., & Evans, R. (2007). Rethinking Expertise. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
Dewey, J. (2002). Human Nature and Conduct. Amherst, NY: Prometheus Books.
Epstein, S. (2023). The Meaning and Significance of Lay Expertise. In G. Eyal & T. Medvetz (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Expertise and Democratic Politics (pp. 76–102). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Eyal, G. (2019). The Crisis of Expertise. Cambridge, UK: Polity.
Eyal, G. (2022). Mistrust in Numbers: Regulatory Science, Trans-science and the Crisis of Expertise. Spontaneous Generations: A Journal for the History and Philosophy of Science, 10(1), 36–46.
Foucault, M. (1982). On the Genealogy of Ethics. In H. Dreyfus & P. Rabinow (Eds.), Michel Foucault: Beyond Structuralism and Hermeneutics (pp. 229–252). Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
Foucault, M. (1997). The Ethics of the Concern of the Self as a Practice of Freedom. In The Essential Works of Michel Foucault, Vol. 1: Ethics, Subjectivity and Truth (pp. 281–301). New York, NY: The New Press.
Gouldner, A. (1979). The Future of Intellectuals and the Rise of the New Class. New York, NY: The Seabury Press.
Gramsci, A. (1971). Prison Notebooks. New York, NY: International Publishers.
Harel, A. (2020). Experts Advising the National Security Council: “The Lockdown Saved Israel, but All Efforts Should Be Made to Avoid Another Lockdown”. Ha’aretz, May 28. https://www.haaretz.co.il/health/corona/2020-05-28/ty-article-magazine/.highlight/0000017f-db2e-db5a-a57f-db6e87f30000.
Jasanoff, S. (1997). Science at the Bar. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Merton, R.K., & Barber, E. (2004). The Travels and Adventures of Serendipity. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Patel, V., & Goodman, J.D. (2025). Texas Professor Fired after Accusations of Teaching “Gender Ideology”. New York Times, September 10. https://www.nytimes.com/2025/09/10/us/texas-professor-fired-gender-ideology.html.
Pickering, E., & Davis, S. (2025). UJB Issues Expulsions, Suspensions, and Degree Revocations to Over 70 Students for Butler Demonstration. Columbia Daily Spectator, July 23. https://www.columbiaspectator.com/news/2025/07/22/ujb-issues-expulsions-suspensions-and-degree-revocations-to-over-70-students-for-butler-demonstration/.
Rosental, C. (2013). Toward a Sociology of Public Demonstrations. Sociological Theory, 31(4), 341–365. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735275113513454
Shapin, S. (2008). The Scientific Life: A Modern History of a Late Modern Vocation. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
University of Chicago. (2015). Report of the Committee on Freedom of Expression. https://provost.uchicago.edu/sites/default/files/documents/reports/FOECommitteeReport.pdf.
Weber, M. (1946). Science as a Vocation. In H.H. Gerth & C.W. Mills (Eds.), From Max Weber: Essays in Sociology (pp. 129–157). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Weber, M. (1978). The Routinization of Charisma. In Economy and Society, Vol. I (pp. 246–254). Berkeley, CA: University of California Press. (Original work published 1922).
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Gil Eyal
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
