Market Inequalities and Ecological Distinction: The Moral Ruses of Sustainable Consumption across the North-South Divide

Authors

  • Manisha Anantharaman Center for the Sociology of Organisations (CNRS), Sciences Po https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7668-7000
  • Sophie Dubuisson-Quellier Center for the Sociology of Organisations (CNRS), Sciences Po https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5341-0431

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.60923/issn.1971-8853/24165

Keywords:

Sustainable consumption, Inequality, Lifestyle environmentalism, Social distinction, Consumer economies, Economic sociology, Stratification

Abstract

This paper critically explores how social inequalities shape the practice and politics of sustainable consumption. Drawing on a cultural and economic sociology approach and comparing contexts in the Global North (France) and Global South (India), we argue that sustainable consumption is an insufficient motor for eco-social transformation because it relies on and reproduces market inequalities via everyday practices. Dominant middle-class, performative environmentalisms exclude and stigmatize the poor and aspirational working classes, who often lack the surplus time and financial resources to participate in green consumption. As a result, they are unable to attain the moral recognition and social distinction associated with “enlightened” consumption. Rather than attributing this class polarization solely to the cultural dynamics of environmentalism, we argue that it is better understood as a consequence, and driver, of the broader social inequalities that underpin consumer economies — inequalities that are salient to how production is structured in globalized economies and to how markets are organized and communicate cultural values. We contend that this dynamic of inequality within consumerist societies has been largely overlooked in climate policy frameworks and public discourse, to its own detriment.

References

Akenji, L. (2014). Consumer Scapegoatism and Limits to Green Consumerism. Journal of Cleaner Production. Special Volume: Sustainable Production, Consumption and Livelihoods: Global and Regional Research Perspectives, 63, 13–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.05.022

Aldred, R. (2010). “On the Outside”: Constructing Cycling Citizenship. Social & Cultural Geography, 11(1), 35–52. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649360903414593

Alemany, O.M., & Vayre, J.S. (2015). Big Data and the Future of Knowledge Production in Marketing Research: Ethics, Digital Traces, and Abductive Reasoning. Journal of Marketing Analytics, 3(1), 5–13. https://doi.org/10.1057/jma.2015.1

Alkon, A.H. (2008). From Value to Values: Sustainable Consumption at Farmers Markets. Agriculture and Human Values, 25(4), 487–498. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10460-008-9136-y

Alkon, A.H. (2012). Black, White, and Green: Farmers Markets, Race, and the Green Economy. Athens, GA: University of Georgia Press.

Anantharaman, M. (2017). Elite and Ethical: The Defensive Distinctions of Middle-class Bicycling in Bangalore, India. Journal of Consumer Culture, 17(3), 864–886. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469540516634412

Anantharaman, M. (2018). Critical Sustainable Consumption: A Research Agenda. Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, 8(4), 553–561. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13412-018-0487-4

Anantharaman, M. (2022). Is It Sustainable Consumption or Performative Environmentalism? Consumption and Society, 1(1), 120–143. https://doi.org/10.1332/LTTT8626

Anantharaman, M. (2024). Recycling Class: The Contradictions of Inclusion in Urban Sustainability. Cambridge, MA/London: The MIT Press.

Anantharaman, M., Huddart, E., Middlemiss, L., & Bradbury, S. (2019). Who Participates in Community-based Sustainable Consumption Projects and Why Does It Matter? A Constructively Critical Approach. In C. Isenhour, M. Martiskainen, & L. Middlemiss (Eds.), Power and Politics in Sustainable Consumption Research and Practice (pp. 178–200). London, UK: Routledge.

Anses (2024). Évaluation des risques sanitaires pour les travailleurs des plateformes numériques de livraison de repas en France. (Saisine n° 2021-SA-0045). Maisons-Alfort: Anses.

Arnould, E.J., Jones, H., & Marchais, D. (2025). Conventional and Ontological Consumer Creativity. In M. Taillard & C. Preece (Eds.), The Power of Consumer Creativity. Transforming Consumption and Markets (pp. 15–38). Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-96247-9_2

Barendregt, B., & Jaffe, R. (2014). Green Consumption: The Global Rise of Eco-Chic. London, UK: Routledge.

Baudelot, C., & Establet, R. (1994). Maurice Halbwachs: Consommation et société. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.

Baumann, S.M., Huddart, E., & Johnston, J. (2022). Moral and Aesthetic Consecration and Higher Status Consumers’ Tastes: The “Good” Food Revolution. Poetics, 92(Part B), 101654. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.poetic.2022.101654

Baviskar, A. (2011). Cows, Cars and Cycle-rickshaws: Bourgeois Environmentalism and the Battle for Delhi’s Streets. In A. Baviskar & R. Ray (Eds.), Elite and Everyman: The Cultural Politics of the Indian Middle Classes (pp. 391–418). London, UK: Routledge.

Beauvisage, T., Beuscart, J.-S., Coavoux, S., & Mellet, K. (2024). How Online Advertising Targets Consumers: The Uses of Categories and Algorithmic Tools by Audience Planners. New Media & Society, 26(10), 6098–6119. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448221146174

Bengtsson, M., Alfredsson, E., Cohen, M., Lorek, S., & Schroeder, P. (2018). Transforming Systems of Consumption and Production for Achieving the Sustainable Development Goals: Moving Beyond Efficiency. Sustainability Science, 13(6), 1533–1547. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-018-0582-1

Bergeron, H., Castel, P., Dubuisson-Quellier, S., Lazarus, J., Nouguez, É., & Pilmis, O. (2018). Le biais comportementaliste. Paris: Presses de Sciences Po.

Bhar, S., Lele, S., & Rao, N.D. (2022). Beyond Income: Correlates of Conspicuous and Luxury Consumption in India. Sustainability: Science, Practice and Policy, 18(1), 142–157. https://doi.org/10.1080/15487733.2022.2029041

Bourdieu, P. (1979). La distinction: Critique sociale du jugement. Paris: Les Editions de Minuit.

Bourdieu, P. (1980). Le sens pratique. Paris: Editions de Minuit.

Brand, K.-W. (2010). Social Practices and Sustainable Consumption: Benefits and Limitations of a New Theoretical Approach. In M. Gross & H. Heinrichs (Eds.), Environmental Sociology (pp. 217–235). Dordrecht: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-8730-0_13

Bruegel, M. (2001). A Bourgeois Good? Sugar, Norms of Consumption and the Labouring Classes in Nineteenth-century France. In P. Scholliers (Ed.), Food, Drink and Identity: Cooking, Eating and Drinking in Europe Since the Middle Ages (pp. 60–73), London, UK: Berg.

Bryant, R.L., & Goodman, M.K. (2004). Consuming Narratives: The Political Ecology of “Alternative” Consumption. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 29(3), 344–366. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0020-2754.2004.00333.x

Callon, M., Millo, Y., & Muniesa, F. (Eds.). (2007). Market Devices. Malden, MA: Blackwell.

Carfagna, L.B., Dubois, E.A., Fitzmaurice, C., Ouimette, M.Y., Schor, J.B., Willis, M., & Laidley, T. (2014). An Emerging Eco-habitus: The Reconfiguration of High Cultural Capital Practices Among Ethical Consumers. Journal of Consumer Culture, 14(2), 158–178. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469540514526227

Chessel, M.-E., & Dubuisson-Quellier, S. (2018). The Making of the Consumer: Historical and Sociological Perspectives. In O. Kravets, P. Maclaran, S. Miles, & A. Venkatesh (Eds.), The SAGE Handbook of Consumer Culture (pp. 43–60). London, UK: Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781473998803.n4

Classes Vertes. (2025). La condition écologique des classes sociales: L’injustice environnementale à l’intersection des rapports de domination. Actes de la recherche en sciences sociales, 255(5), 4–27. https://doi.org/10.3917/arss.255.0004

Cochoy, F. (2014). Aux origines du libre-service: Progressive Grocer (1922–1959). Lormont: Le Bord de l’eau.

Cohen, M.J., & Murphy, J. (Eds.) (2001). Exploring Sustainable Consumption: Environmental Policy and the Social Sciences. Amsterdam: Pergamon Press.

Comby, J.-B. (2024). Écolos, mais pas trop: Les classes sociales face à l’enjeu environnemental. Paris: Raisons d’agir.

Comby, J.-B., & Malier, H. (2022). Les classes populaires et l’enjeu écologique: Un rapport réaliste travaillé par des dynamiques statutaires diverses. Sociétés contemporaines, 124(4), 37–66. https://doi.org/10.3917/soco.124.0037

Coulangeon, P., Demoli, Y., Ginsburger, M., & Petev, I. (2023). La conversion écologique des Français. Contradictions et clivages. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.

Dablanc, L., Aguilera, A., Krier, C., & Cognez, A. (2022). Etude 2022 sur les livreurs des plateformes à Paris et en petite couronne. Institut Français des Sciences et Technologies des Transports, de l’Aménagement et des Réseaux. https://hal.science/hal-03903591v1

De Moor, J., & Verhaegen, S. (2020). Gateway or Getaway? Testing the Link between Lifestyle Politics and Other Modes of Political Participation. European Political Science Review, 12(1), 91–111. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1755773919000377

Dubuisson-Quellier, S. (2009). La consommation engagée. Paris: Presses de Sciences Po.

Dubuisson-Quellier, S. (2022). How Does Affluent Consumption Come to Consumers? A Research Agenda for Exploring the Foundations and Lock-ins of Affluent Consumption. Consumption and Society, 1(1), 31–50. https://doi.org/10.1332/UHIW3894

Dubuisson-Quellier, S. (2025). La crise écologique comme fait social. Penser le gouvernement de la transition avec les sciences sociales. Comptes Rendus. Géoscience, 357, 401–409. https://doi.org/10.5802/crgeos.306

Dubuisson-Quellier, S. (2026). Consumer Markets: The Affluent Economy and the Social Stratification of Consumption. In J. Smith Maguire (Ed.), Research Handbook on the Sociology of Consumption (pp. 60–73). Cheltenham/Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781035310517.00012

Dubuisson-Quellier, S., & Gojard, S. (2016). Why are Food Practices not (More) Environmentally Friendly in France? The Role of Collective Standards and Symbolic Boundaries in Food Practices: Symbolic Boundaries in Food Practices. Environmental Policy and Governance, 26(2), 89–100. https://doi.org/10.1002/eet.1703

Erler, M., Keck, M., & Dittrich, C. (2022). The Changing Meaning of Millet: Organic Shops and Distinctive Consumption Practices in Bengaluru, India. Journal of Consumer Culture, 22(1), 124–142. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469540520902508

Flemmen, M.P. (2025). Green Against Greed: Negating Economic Capital Through Ecological Distinction. British Journal of Sociology, 76(4), 907–931. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-4446.13231

Franzen, A., & Meyer, R. (2010). Environmental Attitudes in Cross-national Perspective: A Multilevel Analysis of the ISSP 1993 and 2000. European Sociological Review, 26(2), 219–234. https://doi.org/10.1093/esr/jcp018

Frazier, C. (2018). “Grow What You Eat, Eat What You Grow”: Urban Agriculture as Middle Class Intervention in India. Journal of Political Ecology, 25(1), 221–238. https://doi.org/10.2458/v25i1.22970

Geerts, R. (2024). Are Environmental Practices Luxury Goods? Towards a Framework for Social Class and Environmental Practices in Everyday Life. Doctoral dissertation, University of Antwerp. https://repository.uantwerpen.be/link/irua/206740

Ginsburger, M. (2020). De la norme à la pratique écocitoyenne: Position sociale, contraintes matérielles et diversité des rapports à l’écocitoyenneté. Revue française de sociologie, 61(1), 43–78. https://doi.org/10.3917/rfs.611.0043

Goodman, D. (2000). Organic and Conventional Agriculture: Materializing Discourse and Agro-Ecological Managerialism. Agriculture and Human Values, 17(3), 215–219. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007650924982

Greenberg, M. (2013). What on Earth Is Sustainable? Toward Critical Sustainability Studies. Boom: A Journal of California, 3(4), 54–66. https://doi.org/10.1525/boom.2013.3.4.54

Guthman, J. (2003). Fast Food/Organic Food: Reflexive Tastes and the Making of “Yuppie Chow”. Social & Cultural Geography, 4(1), 45–58. https://doi.org/10.1080/1464936032000049306

Guthman, J. (2008). “If They Only Knew”: Color Blindness and Universalism in California Alternative Food Institutions. The Professional Geographer, 60(3), 387–397. https://doi.org/10.1080/00330120802013679

Huddart, E. (2022). Eco-Types: Five Ways of Caring About the Environment. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9780691239576-toc

Huddart, E., & Givens, J.E. (2019). Eco-habitus or Eco-powerlessness? Examining Environmental Concern across Social Class. Sociological Perspectives, 62(5), 646–667. https://doi.org/10.1177/0731121419836966

Huddart, E., & Horne, C. (2020). Accidental Environmentalist or Ethical Elite? The Moral Dimensions of Environmental Impact. Poetics, 82, 101448. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.poetic.2020.101448

Karpik, L. (2010). Valuing the Unique: The Economics of Singularities. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Kroesen, M., Mehdizadeh, M., & Moleman, M. (2026). Spill-over Effects between Daily and Air Travel Behavior: A Panel Analysis in the Netherlands. Transportation. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-026-10754-6

Lamont, M. (2018). Addressing Recognition Gaps: Destigmatization and the Reduction of Inequality. American Sociological Review, 83(3), 419–444. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003122418773775

Lange, H., & Meier, L. (Eds.) (2009). The New Middle Classes: Globalizing Lifestyles, Consumerism and Environmental Concern. Dordrecht: Springer.

Lawson, V., & Elwood, S. (2014). Encountering Poverty: Space, Class, and Poverty Politics. Antipode, 46(1), 209–228. https://doi.org/10.1111/anti.12030

Lüthje, C., Herstatt, C., & Von Hippel, E. (2005). User-innovators and “Local” Information: The Case of Mountain Biking. Research Policy, 34(6), 951–965. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2005.05.005

Madon, J. (2021). Free Repair against the Consumer Society: How Repair Cafés Socialize People to a New Relationship to Objects. Journal of Consumer Culture, 22(2), 534–550. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469540521990871

Malier, H. (2019). Greening the Poor: The Trap of Moralization. British Journal of Sociology, 70(5), 1661–1680. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-4446.12672

Malier, H. (2021). No (Sociological) Excuses for Not Going Green: How Do Environmental Activists Make Sense of Social Inequalities and Relate to the Working Class? European Journal of Social Theory, 24(3), 411–430. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368431021996611

Médecins du Monde, IRD, & Ined (2026). Étude Santé-Course, Dossier de presse: Conditions de travail et santé des livreurs des plateformes. Saint-Denis: Médecins du Monde

Micheletti, M. (2003). Political Virtue and Shopping: Individuals, Consumerism, and Collective Action. New York, NY/Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

Micheletti, M., Follesdal, A., & Stolle, D. (2011). Politics, Products, and Markets: Exploring Political Consumerism Past and Present. New Brunswick, NJ/London: Transaction Publishers.

Paddeu, F. (2021). Sous les pavés, la terre: Agricultures urbaines et résistances dans les métropoles. Paris: Seuil.

Prasad, M. (2012). The Land of Too Much: American Abundance and the Paradox of Poverty. Cambridge, MA/London: Harvard University Press.

Pulido, L. (1996). Ecological Legitimacy and Cultural Essentialism: Hispano Grazing in the Southwest. Capitalism Nature Socialism, 7(4), 37–58. https://doi.org/10.1080/10455759609358707

Ramakrishnan, A., Kalkuhl, M., Ahmad, S., & Creutzig, F. (2020). Keeping Up with the Patels: Conspicuous Consumption Drives the Adoption of Cars and Appliances in India. Energy Research & Social Science, 70, 101742. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2020.101742

Rice, J.L., Cohen, D.A., Long, J., & Jurjevich, J.R. (2020). Contradictions of the Climate-friendly City: New Perspectives on Eco-gentrification and Housing Justice. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 44(1), 145–165. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2427.12740

Sahakian, M., & Wilhite, H. (2014). Making Practice Theory Practicable: Towards More Sustainable Forms of Consumption. Journal of Consumer Culture, 14(1), 25–44. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469540513505607

Sassatelli, R. (2026). The Political Life of Everyday Sustainability. Conspicuous Sustainable Consumption and Normative Resistance. Sociologica, 20(2), 5–22. https://doi.org/10.60923/issn.1971-8853/24203

Saunier, C., Talpin, J., & Delfini, A. (2025). Les conditions sociales d’une écologie populaire. Mobilisation environnementale et rapports de classe au sein d’une ferme urbaine en quartier populaire. Actes de la recherche en sciences sociales, 256(1), 42–59. https://doi.org/10.3917/arss.256.0042

Schau, H.J., Muñiz, A.M., & Arnould, E.J. (2009). How Brand Community Practices Create Value. Journal of Marketing, 73(5), 30–51. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.73.5.30

Schor, J., & Holt, D.B. (Eds.) (2000). The Consumer Society Reader. New York: The New Press.

Sheller, M. (2023). Mobility Justice after Climate Coloniality: Mobile Commoning as a Relational Ethics of Care. Australian Geographer, 54(4), 433–447. https://doi.org/10.1080/00049182.2023.2178247

Shove, E., Pantzar, M., & Watson, M. (2012). The Dynamics of Social Practice: Everyday Life and How it Changes. London: Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446250655

Soper, K. (2007). Re-thinking the “Good Life”: The Citizenship Dimension of Consumer Disaffection with Consumerism. Journal of Consumer Culture, 7(2), 205–229. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469540507077681

Soutjis, B. (2020). Gouverner la qualité alimentaire par les applications. Sociologies pratiques, 41(2), 81–94. https://doi.org/10.3917/sopr.041.0081

Trentmann, F. (2016). Empire of Things: How We Became a World of Consumers, from the Fifteenth Century to the Twenty-First. London, UK: Allen Lane.

van Holstein, E. (2019). The Social Boundary Work of New Middle-Class Organic Gardeners in Bangalore, India. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 44, 126432. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2019.126432

Veblen, T. (1899). The Theory of the Leisure Class: An Economic Study of Institutions. New York, NY: Macmillan.

Downloads

Published

2026-08-06

How to Cite

Anantharaman, M., & Dubuisson-Quellier, S. (2026). Market Inequalities and Ecological Distinction: The Moral Ruses of Sustainable Consumption across the North-South Divide. Sociologica, 20(2), 63–84. https://doi.org/10.60923/issn.1971-8853/24165

Issue

Section

Symposium