Machine Demons
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.60923/issn.1971-8853/24341Keywords:
Machine learning, Artificial intelligence, Epistemology, Computational MethodsAbstract
Machine learning has reinvigorated longstanding ambitions to develop a predictive science of society. This essay argues that enthusiasm for ML as a turning point rests on a category confusion between two distinct scientific imaginaries: Laplace’s deterministic universe, in which sufficient data and computational power yield precise prediction, and Comte’s social physics, which sought descriptive regularities rather than causal mechanisms. ML’s insertion within the dominant causal frameworks that characterize much quantitative social science implies, in particular, that the Comtian promise is far from reality on the ground. The essay explores three reasons why ML is unlikely to deliver a fundamental epistemic break: the performative instability of social classifications, the irreducible indexicality of data and claims, and the irreducibility of collective knowledge to information underdetermine ML’s overall capacity.References
Abramson, C.M., Joslyn, J., Rendle, K.A., Garrett, S.B., & Dohan, D. (2018). The Promises of Computational Ethnography: Improving Transparency, Replicability, and Validity for Realist Approaches to Ethnographic Analysis. Ethnography, 19(2), 254–284. https://doi.org/10.1177/1466138117725340
Asimov, I. (1951). Foundation. New York: Gnome Press.
Bail, C.A. (2024). Can Generative AI Improve Social Science? Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 121(21), e2314021121. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2314021121
Banerjee, A.V. (2020). Field Experiments and the Practice of Economics. American Economic Review, 110(7), 1937–1951. https:/doi.org/10.1257/aer.110.7.1937
Barnes, B. (1983). Social Life as Bootstrapped Induction. Sociology, 17(4), 524–545. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038583017004004
Barnes, B. (2003). Thomas Kuhn and the Problem of Social Order in Science. In T. Nickles (Ed.), Thomas Kuhn (pp. 122–141). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Barnes, B. (2013). Scientific Knowledge and Sociological Theory. London: Routledge.
Barnes, B., Bloor, D., & Henry, J. (1996). Scientific Knowledge: A Sociological Analysis. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Boelart, J., & Ollion, E. (2018). The Great Regression: Machine Learning, Econometrics and the Future of Quantitative Social Sciences. Revue française de sociologie, 59(3), 475–506. https://www.jstor.org/stable/48740414
Brand, J.E., Zhou, X., & Xie, Y. (2023). Recent Developments in Causal Inference and Machine Learning. Annual Review of Sociology, 49, 81–110. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-soc-030420-015345
Chen, Y., Wu, X., Hu, A., He, G., & Ju, G. (2021). Social Prediction: A New Research Paradigm Based on Machine Learning. The Journal of Chinese Sociology, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40711-021-00152-z
Comte, A. (1830–1842). Cours de philosophie positive (6 vols.). Paris: Bachelier.
Comte, A. (1856). Social Physics: From the Positive Philosophy of Auguste Comte (H. Martineau, Trans.). New York: C. Blanchard. (Original work published 1830–1842)
Comte, A. (2018). Écrits de jeunesse 1816–1828: Suivis du Mémoire sur la ’Cosmogonie’de Laplace, 1835 (Vol. 5). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co KG.
Day, R.E. (2001). The Modern Invention of Information: Discourse, History, and Power. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.
de Souza Leão, L., & Eyal, G. (2019). The Rise of Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs) in International Development in Historical Perspective. Theory and Society, 48(3), 383–418. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11186-019-09352-6
Engzell, P., & Wilmers, N. (2026). The Paper Factory. [SocArXiv preprint]. https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/24xfq_v1
Eșanu, A. (2019). Auguste Comte and JS Mill on Physical Causes: The Case of Joseph Fourier’s Analytical Theory of Heat. Hopos: The Journal of the International Society for the History of Philosophy of Science, 9(2), 275–295. https://doi.org/10.1086/704373
Fourcade, M., & Healy, K. (2024). The Ordinal Society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Galison, P. (1997). Image and Logic: A Material Culture of Microphysics. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Garip, F. (2020). What Failure to Predict Life Outcomes Can Teach Us. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 117(15), 8234–8235. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2003390117
Grimmer, J. (2015). We Are All Social Scientists Now: How Big Data, Machine Learning, and Causal Inference Work Together. PS: Political Science & Politics, 48(1), 80–83. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096514001784
Hacking, I. (1999). The Social Construction of What? Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Jaton, F. (2021). Assessing Biases, Relaxing Moralism: On Ground-Truthing Practices in Machine Learning Design and Application. Big Data & Society, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/20539517211013569
Jaton, F. (2025). Examining Algorithms in the Light of their Ground Truth Datasets: Results, Objections, and Avenues of Reflection. Digital Society, 4. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44206-025-00197-4
Kang, E. (2023). Ground Truth Tracings (GTT): On the Epistemic Limits of Machine Learning. Big Data & Society, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/20539517221146122
Leitgöb, H., Prandner, D., & Wolbring, T. (2023). Big Data and Machine Learning in Sociology. Frontiers in Sociology, 8. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsoc.2023.1173155
Liu, D.M., & Salganik, M.J. (2019). Successes and Struggles with Computational Reproducibility: Lessons from the Fragile Families Challenge. Socius: Sociological Research for a Dynamic World, 5. https://doi.org/10.1177/2378023119849803
Mantegna, R.N., & Stanley, H.E. (1999). Introduction to Econophysics: Correlations and Complexity in Finance. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Laplace, P.S. (1825). Essai philosophique sur les probabilités. Paris: Bachelier.
Molina, M., & Garip, F. (2019). Machine Learning for Sociology. Annual Review of Sociology, 45, 27–45. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-soc-073117-041106
Mullick, P., & Sen, P. (2025). Sociophysics Models Inspired by the Ising Model. The European Physical Journal B, 98(9). https://doi.org/10.1140/epjb/s10051-025-01053-7
Nelson, L.K. (2020). Computational Grounded Theory: A Methodological Framework. Sociological Methods & Research, 49(1), 3–42. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124117729703
Pickering, M. (1993). Auguste Comte: An Intellectual Biography, Vol. 1. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Salganik, M.J. (2023). Predicting the Future of Society. Nature Human Behaviour, 7(4), 478–479. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-023-01535-7
Salganik, M.J., Lundberg, I., Kindel, A.T., & McLanahan, S. (2019). Introduction to the Special Collection on the Fragile Families Challenge. Socius: Sociological Research for a Dynamic World, 5. https://doi.org/10.1177/2378023119871580
Savcisens, G., Eliassi-Rad, T., Hansen, L.K., Mortensen, L.H., Lilleholt, L., Rogers, A., Zettler, I., & Lehmann, S. (2024). Using Sequences of Life-events to Predict Human Lives. Nature Computational Science, 4(1), 43–56. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43588-023-00573-5
Quételet, A. (1835). Sur l’homme et le développement de ses facultés, ou Essai de physique sociale. Paris: Bachelier.
Sen, P., & Chakrabarti, B.K. (2014). Sociophysics: An Introduction. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Shannon, C.E. (1948). A Mathematical Theory of Communication. The Bell System Technical Journal, 27(3), 379–423. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1538-7305.1948.tb01338.x
Sutherland, M.E. (2018). Computational Social Science Heralds the Age of Interdisciplinary Science. Springer Nature Research Communities, October 1 Retrieved from: https://communities.springernature.com/posts/computational-social-science-heralds-the-age-of-interdisciplinary-science
The Forecasting Collaborative. (2023). Insights into the Accuracy of Social Scientists’ Forecasts of Societal Change. Nature Human Behaviour, 7(4), 484–501. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-022-01517-1
Turner, J.H., Beeghley, L., & Powers, C.H. (2011). The Emergence of Sociological Theory. London: Sage.
Waight, H., Yang, E., Yuan, Y. et al. (2026). State Media Control Influences Large Language Models. Nature. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-026-10506-7
Webber, S., & Prouse, C. (2018). The New Gold Standard: The Rise of Randomized Control Trials and Experimental Development. Economic Geography, 94(2), 166–187. https://doi.org/10.1080/00130095.2017.1392235
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Juan Pablo Pardo-Guerra
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
