Ideas, Context and Connections: Conceptual Framing of the Opportunity to Innovate for Migrant Entrepreneurs
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.6092/issn.1971-8853/8624Keywords:
migrant entrepreneurship, migration-based innovation, mixed-embeddedness, migrant innovativeness, diffusion of innovationsAbstract
Are migrant entrepreneurs innovative with their business ideas and practices? The introduction of novel business ideas would provide migrant entrepreneurs with a cutting edge advantage against competitors, but the research about this topic is thin on the ground. I propose that the opportunity of migrant entrepreneurs to introduce an innovation is better understood by a closer look at the business idea itself and to which extent it is innovative; by considering the contextual factors where the opportunity structure influences the development of migrant businesses; and by the existence of social connections to share resources and information among entrepreneurs. Such complementary concepts - combining the interaction of the social, human, cultural and financial resources of individual migrants in relation to the wider opportunity structure - provide a comprehensive understanding of the opportunity for entrepreneurs to innovate. By using those contributions as conceptual building blocks, I propose the use of innovativeness levels for migrant entrepreneurs following the processes of adaptation and massification of goods and services introduced by migrants over time. This article builds from existing frameworks: contributions about the definitions and typology of innovation; the mixed-embeddedness approach, which has been largely used to study the opportunity structure; and the model of diffusion of innovations which pays a larger attention to the product and the agency of actors.References
Aldrich, H.E. (2005). Entrepreneurship. In R. Swedberg & N. Smelser (Eds.), The Handbook of Economic Sociology (pp. 451–477). Princeton & Oxford: Princeton University Press; and New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
Aldrich, H.E., & Waldinger, R. (1990). Ethnicity and Entrepreneurship. Annual Review of Sociology, 16, 111–135. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.so.16.080190.000551
Aliaga-Isla, R., & Rialp, A. (2013). Systematic Review of Immigrant Entrepreneurship Literature: Previous Findings and Ways Forward. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 25(9–10), 819–844. https://doi.org/10.1080/08985626.2013.845694
Ambrosini, M. (2012). Migrants’ Entrepreneurship in Transnational Social Fields: Research in the Italian Context. International Review of Sociology, 22(2), 273–292. https://doi.org/10.1080/03906701.2012.696970
Antonioli, D., Mazzanti, M., & Pini, P. (2009). Innovation, Working Conditions and Industrial Relations: Evidence for a Local Production System. Economic and Industrial Democracy, 30(2), 157–181. https://doi.org/10.1177/0143831X09102418
Autio, E., Kenney, M., Mustar, P., Siegel, D., & Wright, M. (2014). Entrepreneurial Innovation: The Importance of Context. Research Policy, 43(7), 1097–1108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2014.01.015
Bagwell, S. (2018). From Mixed Embeddedness to Transnational Mixed Embeddedness. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, 24(1), 104–120. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEBR-01-2017-0035
Basu, D., & Werbner, P. (2001). Bootstrap Capitalism and the Culture Industries: A Critique of Invidious Comparisons in the Study of Ethnic Entrepreneurship. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 24(2), 236–262. https://doi.org/10.1080/01419870020023436
Baumol, W.J. (2002). Entrepreneurship, Innovation and Growth: The David-Goliath Symbiosis. The Journal of Entrepreneurial Finance and Business Ventures, 7(2), 1–10.
Baumol, W.J. (2010). The Microtheory of Innovative Entrepreneurship (STU-Stud). Princeton University Press. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt21668j9
Betts, A., Bloom, L., & Weaver, N. (2015). Refugee Innovation: Humanitarian innovation that starts with communities. Oxford: University of Oxford Refugee Studies Center.
Bilecen, B., Gamper, M., & Lubbers, M.J. (2018). The Missing Link: Social Network Analysis in Migration and Transnationalism. Social Networks, 53, 1–3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2017.07.001
Bosetti, V., Cattaneo, C., & Verdolini, E. (2015). Migration of Skilled Workers and Innovation: A European Perspective. Journal of International Economics, 96(2), 311–322. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinteco.2015.04.002
Bruland, K., & Mowery, D.C. (2006). Innovation through Time. The Oxford Handbook of Innovation. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199286805.003.0013
Burt, R. (2000). The Network Entrepreneur. In R. Swedberg (Ed.), Entrepreneurship: The Social Science View (pp. 281–307). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Burt, R. (2004). Structural Holes and Good Ideas. American Journal of Sociology, 110(2), 349–399. https://doi.org/10.1086/421787
Chatterji, A., Glaeser, E., & Kerr, W. (2014). Clusters of Entrepreneurship and Innovation. Innovation Policy and the Economy, 14(1), 129–166. https://doi.org/10.1086/674023
Dawkins, C.J. (2008). Diversity and Community in the Twenty‐first Century the 2006 Johan Skytte Prize Lecture". Housing Policy Debate, 19(1), 207–217. https://doi.org/10.1080/10511482.2008.9521631
Dheer, R.J.S. (2018). Entrepreneurship by Immigrants: A Review of Existing Literature and Directions for Future Research. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 14(3), 555–614. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-018-0506-7
European Commission. (2018). Directorate-General (DG) for Internal Market, Industry, Entrepreneurship and SMEs. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/growth/smes/promoting-entrepreneurship/we-work-for/migrants_en
Fullin, G. (2011). Unemployment Trap or High Job Turnover? Ethnic Penalties and Labour Market Transitions in Italy. International Journal of Comparative Sociology, 52(4), 284–305. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020715211412111
Granovetter, M. (1985). Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of Embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology, 91(3), 481–510. https://doi.org/10.1086/228311
Granovetter, M. (2005). The Impact of Social Structure on Economic Outcomes. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 19(1), 33–50. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/4134991
Greve, A., & Salaff, J.W. (2003). Social Networks and Entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 28(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-8520.00029
Hall, B.H. (2006). Innovation and Diffusion. Oxford Handbook of Innovation. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199286805.003.0017
Herstad, S.J. (2017). Innovation Strategy Choices in the Urban Economy. Urban Studies, 55(6), 1185–1202. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098017692941
Herz, A. (2015). Relational Constitution of Social Support in Migrants’ Transnational Personal Communities. Social Networks, 40, 64–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2014.08.001
Hoang, H., & Antoncic, B. (2003). Network-based Research in Entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Venturing, 18(2), 165–187. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-9026(02)00081-2
Hovhannisyan, N., & Keller, W. (2015). International Business Travel: An Engine of Innovation? Journal of Economic Growth, 20(1), 75–104. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10887-014-9107-7
Hunt, J. (2011). Which Immigrants Are Most Innovative and Entrepreneurial? Distinctions by Entry Visa. Journal of Labor Economics, 29(3), 417–457. https://doi.org/10.1086/659409.
Jensen, P.H. (2014). Understanding the Impact of Migration on Innovation. Australian Economic Review, 47(2), 240–250. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8462.12067
Jones, T., Ram, M., Edwards, P., Kiselinchev, A., & Muchenje, L. (2012). New Migrant Enterprise: Novelty or Historical Continuity? Urban Studies, 49(14), 3159–3176. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098012439109
Jones, T., Ram, M., Edwards, P., Kiselinchev, A., & Muchenje, L. (2014). Mixed Embeddedness and New Migrant Enterprise in the UK. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 26(5–6), 500–520. https://doi.org/10.1080/08985626.2014.950697
Jong, J.P.J., & Marsili, O. (2010). Schumpeter Versus Kirzner: An Empirical Investigation of Opportunity Types. EIM Research Reports. Zoetermeer.
Kloosterman, R.C. (2010). Matching Opportunities with Resources: A Framework for Analysing (Migrant) Entrepreneurship from a Mixed Embeddedness Perspective. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 22(1), 25–45. https://doi.org/10.1080/08985620903220488
Kloosterman, R.C., & Rath, J. (2001). Immigrant Entrepreneurs in Advanced Economies: Mixed Embeddedness further Explored. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 27(2), 189–201. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691830020041561
Kloosterman, R.C., & Rath, J. (2014). Immigrant Entrepreneurship. In M. Martiniello & J. Rath (Eds.), An Introduction to Immigrant Incorporation Studies: European Perspectives (pp. 195–225). Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
Kloosterman, R.C., Rusinovic, K., & Yeboah, D. (2016). Super-diverse Migrants — Similar trajectories? Ghanaian Entrepreneurship in The Netherlands Seen from a Mixed Embeddedness Perspective. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 42(6), 913–932. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2015.1126091
Kloosterman, R.C., van der Leun, J., & Rath, J. (1999). Mixed Embeddedness: (In)formal Economic Activities and Immigrant Businesses in The Netherlands. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 23(2), 252–266. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2427.00194
Kuppinger, P. (2014). A Neighborhood Shopping Street and the Making of Urban Cultures and Economies in Germany. City and Community, 13(2), 140–157. https://doi.org/10.1111/cico.12064
Ladkin, A., Willis, C., Jain, J., Clayton, W., & Marouda, M. (2016). Business Travellers’ Connections to Home: ICTs Supporting Work-Life Balance. New Technology, Work and Employment, 31(3), 255–270. https://doi.org/10.1111/ntwe.12071
Lange, T. de. (2018). The Twain Meet, but Is It Enough? Intersecting Policies of Innovation and Entrepreneurship Migration in the EU and the Netherlands. In S. Carrera, A.P.L. den Hertog, M. Panizzon, & D. Kostakopoulou (Eds.), EU External Policies on Migration, Borders and Asylum. Leiden: Brill Nijhoff. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004354234
Leung, M.W.H. (2001). Get IT Going: New Ethnic Chinese Business. The Case of Taiwanese-owned Computer Firms in Hamburg. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 27(2), 277–294. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691830020041615
Light, I., & Gold, S. (2000). Ethnic Economies. San Diego: Academic Press.
Logan, J.R., Zhang, W., & Alba, R.D. (2002). Immigrant Enclaves and Ethnic Communities in New York and Los Angeles. American Sociological Review, 67(2), 299–322. https://doi.org/10.2307/3088897
Malerba, F. (2006). Sectoral Systems: How and Why Innovation Differs across Sectors. The Oxford Handbook of Innovation. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199286805.003.0014
Miles, I. (2009). Innovation in Services. The Oxford Handbook of Innovation. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199286805.003.0016
Molina, J.L., Valenzuela-García, H., García-Macías, A., Lubbers, M., & Pampalona, J. (2015). Social Capital in Ethnic Enclaves: Indians in Lloret de Mar and Pakistanis in Barcelona. In Y. Li (Ed.), Handbook of Research Methods and Applications in Social Capital (pp. 377–398). Cheltenham, Uk & Northampton, MA, USA: Edward Elgar Pubs. https://doi.org/10.4337/9780857935854.00025
Morgan, H.M., Sui, S., & Baum, M. (2018). Are SMEs with Immigrant Owners Exceptional Exporters? Journal of Business Venturing, 33(3), 241–260. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2017.12.003
Neil, S., & Swedberg, R. (2005). The Handbook of Economic Socioloy (2nd Ed.). Princeton: Princeton University Press and Russell Sage Foundation.
OECD/EuroStat. (2005). Oslo Manual: Guidelines for Collecting and Interpreting Innovation (3rd Ed.). Paris: OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264013100-en
Ozgen, C., Nijkamp, P., & Poot, J. (2011). Immigration and Innovation in European Regions. Tinbergen Institute Discussion Paper 11–112/3. Available at SSRN Electronic Journal: http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1908138
Podolny, J.M. (2001). Networks as the Pipes and Prisms of the Market. American Journal of Sociology, 107(1), 33–60. https://doi.org/10.1086/323038
Portes, A. (1995). Economic Sociology and the Sociology of Immigration: A Conceptual Overview. In A. Portes (Ed.), The Economic Sociology of Immigration: Essays on Networks, Ethnicity, and Entrepreneurship (pp. 1–41). Russell Sage Foundation. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.7758/9781610444521.5
Portes, A., Guarnizo, L.E., & Landolt, P. (1999). The Study of Transnationalism: Pitfalls and Promise of an Emergent Research Field. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 22(2), 217–237. https://doi.org/10.1080/014198799329468
Portes, A., & Sensenbrenner, J. (1993). Embeddedness and Immigration: Notes on the Social Determinants of Economic Action. American Journal of Sociology, 98(6), 1320–1350. https://doi.org/10.1086/230191
Portes, A., & Vickstrom, E. (2011). Diversity, Social Capital, and Cohesion. Annual Review of Sociology, 37, 461–479. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-soc-081309-150022
Ram, M., Jones, T., & Villares-Varela, M. (2017). Migrant Entrepreneurship: Reflections on Research and Practice. International Small Business Journal, 35(1), 3–18. https://doi.org/10.1177/0266242616678051
Ramella, F. (2015). Sociology of Economic Innovation (1st Ed.). London, UK: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315753522
Rana, M.B., & Elo, M. (2017). Transnational Diaspora and Civil Society Actors Driving MNE Internationalisation: The Case of Grameenphone in Bangladesh. Journal of International Management, 23(1), 87–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intman.2016.11.005
Rath, J. (2005). Feeding the Festive City Immigrant Entrepreneurs and Tourist Industry. In E. Guild & J. van Selm (Eds.), International Migration and Security: Opportunities and Challenges (pp. 238–253). London and New York: Routledge.
Rath, J., Bodaar, A., Wagemaakers, T., & Wu, P.Y. (2018). Chinatown 2.0: The Difficult Flowering of an Ethnically Themed Shopping Area. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 44(1), 81–98. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2017.1332521
Rath, J.C., Solano, G., & Schutjens, V.A.J.M. (2019, in press). Migrant Entrepreneurship and Transnational Links. In C. Inglis, B. Khadria, & W. Li (Eds.), The Sage Handbook of International Migration. London: Sage.
Rath, J., & Swagerman, A. (2016). Promoting Ethnic Entrepreneurship in European Cities: Sometimes Ambitious, Mostly Absent, Rarely Addressing Structural Features. International Migration, 54(1), 152–166. https://doi.org/10.1111/imig.12215
Razin, E., & Scheinberg, D. (2001). Immigrant Entrepreneurs from the Former USSR in Israel: Not the Traditional Enclave Economy. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 27(2), 259–276. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691830020041606
Riddle, L., & Brinkerhoff, J. (2011). Diaspora Entrepreneurs as Institutional Change Agents: The Case of Thamel.com. International Business Review, 20(6), 670–680. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2011.02.013
Rogers, E.M. (2003). Diffusion of Innovations (5th Ed.). New York: Free Press.
Rogers, E.M. (2004). A Prospective and Retrospective Look at the Diffusion Model. Journal of Health Communication, 9(sup. 1), 13–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730490271449
Rogers, E.M. (2015). Evolution: Diffusion of Innovations. In J.D. Wright (Ed.), International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences (2nd Ed., pp. 378–381). Netherland: Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-097086-8.81064-8
Rusinovic, K. (2008). Transnational Embeddedness: Transnational Activities and Networks among First- and Second-Generation Immigrant Entrepreneurs in the Netherlands. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 34(3), 431–451. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691830701880285
Salaff, J.W., Greve, A., Siu-Lun, W., & Ping, L.X.L. (2003). Ethnic Entrepreneurship, Social Networks, and the Enclave. In B. Yeoh, T.C. Kiong, & M.W. Charney (Eds.), Approaching Transnationalisms. Transnational Societies, Multicultural Contacts, and Imaginings of Home (pp. 61–82). Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-9220-8_4
Saxenian, A. (2002). Local and Global Networks of Immigrant Professionals in Silicon Valley. San Francisco, Ca.: Public Policy Institute of California. Retrieved from http://www.ppic.org/content/pubs/report/r_502asr.pdf
Saxenian, A. (2007). The New Argonauts: Regional Advantage in a Global Economy. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
Schiller, N.G., Basch, L., & Blanc, C.S. (1995). From Immigrant to Transmigrant: Theorizing Transnational Migration. Anthropological Quarterly, 68(1), 48–63. https://doi.org/10.2307/3317464
Schumpeter, J.A. (1939). Business Cycles: A Theoretical, Historical, and Statistical Analysis of the Capitalist Process. New York and London: McGraw-Hill Book Company Inc.
Schumpeter, J.A. (1947). The Creative Response in Economic History. The Journal of Economic History, 7(2), 149–159. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/2113338
Scott, S. (2006). The Social Morphology of Skilled Migration: The Case of the British Middle Class in Paris. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 32(7), 1105–1129. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691830600821802
Śledzik, K. (2013). Schumpeter’s View on Innovation and Entrepreneurship. In S. Hittmar (Ed.), Management Trends in Theory and Practice (pp. 89–95). Faculty of Management Science and Informatics, & Institute of Management: University of Zilina. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2257783
Smith, K. (2006). Measuring Innovation. In J. Fagerberg, D.C. Mowery, & R.R. Nelson (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Innovation (pp. 148–177). New York, US: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199286805.003.0006
Solano, G. (2015). Transnational vs. Domestic Immigrant Entrepreneurs: A Comparative Literature Analysis of the Use of Personal Skills and Social Networks. American Journal of Entrepreneurship, 8(2), 1–21.
Solano, G. (2016). Multifocal Entrepreneurial Practices: The Case of Moroccan Import/Export Businesses in Milan. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Small Business, 29(2), 176. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJESB.2016.078698
Storti, L. (2014). Being an Entrepreneur: Emergence and Structuring of Two Immigrant Entrepreneur Groups. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 26(7–8), 521–545. https://doi.org/10.1080/08985626.2014.959067
Toruńczyk-Ruiz, S. (2014). Neighbourhood Ties and Migrant Networks: The Case of Circular Ukrainian Migrants in Warsaw, Poland. Central and Eastern European Migration Review, 3(1), 41–62.
Vacca, R., Solano, G., Lubbers, M.J., Molina, J.L., & McCarty, C. (2018). A Personal Network Approach to the Study of Immigrant Structural Assimilation and Transnationalism. Social Networks, 53, 72–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2016.08.007
Vissak, T., & Zhang, X. (2014). Chinese Immigrant Entrepreneurs’ Involvement in Internationalization and Innovation: Three Canadian Cases. Journal of International Entrepreneurship, 12(2), 183–201. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10843-014-0128-2
von Tunzelmann, N., & Acha, V. (2006). Innovation In “Low-Tech” Industries. The Oxford Handbook of Innovation. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199286805.003.0015
Welter, F. (2011). Contextualizing Entrepreneurship. Conceptual Challenges and Ways Forward. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 35(1), 165–184. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2010.00427.x
Zhan, S., Bendapudi, N., & Hong, Y. (2015). Re-examining Diversity as a Double-edged Sword for Innovation Process. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 36(7), 1026–1049. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2027
Zhang, Y., & Zhang, M. (2016). Can Overseas Migrants Develop Sustained Entrepreneurship? Multiple Case Studies of Wenzhou Migrants in Italy. The Journal of Chinese Sociology, 3(4), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40711-015-0020-z
Zhou, M., & Portes, A. (1993). The New Second Generation: Segmented Assimilation and Its Variants. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 530, 74–96. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/1047678
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2018 Juan Francisco Alvarado
The copyrights of all the texts on this journal belong to the respective authors without restrictions.
This journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (full legal code).
See also our Open Access Policy.
