Cycles of <em>Dispositions–Unfoldings</em>. A Retro-ANT View of Practices

Alvise Mattozzi

doi:10.6092/issn.1971-8853/9483

Authors

Alvise Mattozzi Free University of Bozen-Bolzano http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7917-3099
Alvise Mattozzi is assistant professor in Sociology of Culture and Communication at the Faculty of Design and Art of the Free University of Bozen-Bolzano. He works at the intersection between Science and Technology Studies and Design Studies, using Actor-Network Theory as general framework and semiotics as descriptive-analytical methodology. His research has mainly a methodological character, investigating how to account for the mediation of artifacts. He has carried out also more specific researches related to the Italian raw milk alternative food network (together with Tiziana Piccioni) and to design practices (together with Laura Lucia Parolin). At present, he is working, on the one hand, on the recovery and rearticulation of “domestication theory”, on the other, on the role of design in interdisciplinary practices (together with Andreas Metzner-Szigeth and Roberta Raffaetà). Together with Kris Krois, he founded the Master in Eco-Social Design at the Free University of Bozen-Bolzano.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.6092/issn.1971-8853/9483

Keywords:

Actor-Network Theory, Actualization, Design, Script, Structuralism, Virtuality

Abstract

The present contribution intends to probe a view of practices as cycles of disposition and unfoldings or, which is the same, of virtualities and actualizations, and to show how such view allows not only to take artifacts into account, but also to account for their contribution to the unfolding of practices. A specific practice, related to squeezing oranges in a sink by using Juicy Salif, the (in)famous Philippe Starck’s squeezer, is exploited as empirical ground for exemplification. In order to probe the proposed view of practices as cycles of disposition and unfoldings, the present contribution engages in an epistemological and in a methodological reflection. On the one hand, it investigates the role of dispositions-virtualities in past and present approaches to practices. On the other, it recovers the disused Actor-Network Theory’s notion of “script” as a way to describe-analyze artifacts’ dispositions or virtualities and thus accounting for their contribution to practices. In the end, the paper, by investigating the role of dispositions-virtualities, recovers the structuralist legacy to the reflection on practices, showing how Actor-Network Theory can be considered a “distributed structuralism”.

References

Akrich, M. (1992). The De-Scription of Technical Objects. In W. E. Bijker, & J. Law (Eds.), Shaping Technology/Building Society (pp. 205–224). Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.

Akrich, M., & Bruno L. (1992). A Summary of Convenient Vocabulary for the Semiotics of Human and Nonhuman Assemblies. In W.E. Bijker & J. Law (Eds.) Shaping Technology/Building Society (pp. 259–264). Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.

Benveniste, É. (1969). Sémiologie de la Langue. Semiotica, 1(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1515/semi.1969.1.1.1

Benveniste, É. (2014). The Formal Apparatus of Enunciation. In J. Angermuller, D. Maingueneau, & R. Wodak (Eds.), The Discourse Studies Reader (pp. 140–145). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. (Original work published 1970)

Brix, A. (2008). Solid Knowledge: Notes on the Nature of Knowledge Embedded in Designed Artefacts. Artifact, 2(1), 36–40. https://doi.org/10.1080/17493460802300933

Bruni, A. (2005). Shadowing Software and Clinical Records: On the Ethnography of Non-Humans and Heterogeneous Contexts. Organization, 12(3), 357–378. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350508405051272

Certeau, M. de. (1984). The Practice of Everyday Life. Berkeley: University of California Press. (Original work published 1980)

Deleuze, G. (1995). Difference and Repetition. New York: Columbia University Press. (Original work published 1968)

Descola, P. (2016). Transformation Transformed. HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory, 6(3), 33–44. https://doi.org/10.14318/hau6.3.005

Dosse, F. (2007). Michel de Certeau. Le marcheur blesse. Paris: La Decouverte.

du Gay, P., Hall, S., Janes, L., Mackey, H., & Negus, K. (1997). Doing Cultural Studies: The Story of the Sony Walkman. London: SAGE.

Gherardi, S. (2019). How to Conduct a Practice-Based Study: Problems and Method (2^nd ed.). London: Edward Elgar.

Giddens, A. (1979). Central Problems in Social Theory: Action, Structure, and Contradiction in Social Analysis. Berkeley: University of California Press.

Giddens, A. (1986). The Constitution of Society: Outline of the Theory of Structuration. Cambridge: Blackwell.

Gonzalez, L. (2007). Juicy Salif as a Cultish Totem. In B. Townley, & N. Beech (Eds.), Managing Creativity: Exploring the Paradox (pp. 287–309). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Greimas, A.J., & Courtés, J. (1982). Semiotics and Language: An Analytical Dictionary. Indiana University Press. (Original work published 1979)

Halkier, B., & Jensen, I. (2011). Methodological Challenges in Using Practice Theory in Consumption Research. Examples from a Study on Handling Nutritional Contestations of Food Consumption. Journal of Consumer Culture, 11(1), 101–123. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469540510391365

Jarzabkowski, P., & Trevor, P. (2013). Sociomateriality Is “the New Black”: Accomplishing Repurposing, Reinscripting and Repairing in Context. M@n@gement, 16(5), 579–592. https://doi.org/10.3917/mana.165.0579

Julier, G. (2013). The Culture of Design. London: SAGE.

Khaslavsky, J., & Shedroff, N. (1999). Understanding the Seductive Experience. Communications of the ACM, 42, 45–49. https://doi.org/10.1145/301353.301407

Koskinen, I. (2005). Semiotic Neighborhoods. Design Issues, 21(2), 13–27. https://doi.org/10.1162/0747936053630142

Law, J. (1999). After ANT: Complexity, Naming and Topology, The Sociological Review, 47(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-954X.1999.tb03479.x

Latour, B. (Johnson, J.) (1988). Mixing Humans and Nonhumans Together: The Sociology of Door-Closer. Social Problems, 35(3), 298–310. https://doi.org/10.2307/800624

Latour, B. (1992). Where Are the Missing Masses? The Sociology of a Few Mundane Artifacts. In W.E. Bijker, & J. Law (Eds.), Shaping Technology/Building Society (pp. 225–258). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Latour, B. (2000). The Berlin Key or How to Do Words with Things. In P. Graves Brown (Ed.), Matter, Materiality and Modern Culture (pp. 10–21). London: Routledge.

Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Latour, B. (2013). An Inquiry into Modes of Existence: An Anthropology of the Moderns. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press. (Original work published 2012)

Lloyd, P., & Snelders D. (2003). What Was Philippe Starck Thinking of? Design Studies, 24(3), 237–253. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-694X(02)00054-6

Magaudda, P. (2011). When Materiality “Bites Back”: Digital Music Consumption Practices in the Age of Dematerialization. Journal of Consumer Culture, 11(1), 15–36. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469540510390499

Magistà, A. (2009). Starck? No Grazie. Casa & Design, March 26 (Retrieved from https://design.repubblica.it/2009/03/26/starck-no-grazie Last visited on 22 February 2019)

Maniglier, P. (2006). La vie énigmatique des signes: Saussure et la naissance du structuralisme. Paris: Max Scheer.

Marenko, B. (2018). The Un-Designability of the Virtual. Design from Problem-Solving to Problem-Finding. In G. Sade, G. Coombs, & A. McNamara (Eds.), UnDesign: Critical Practices at the Intersection of Art and Design. London: Routledge.

Marres, N. (2014). The Environmental Teapot and Other Loaded Household Objects: Reconnecting the Politics of Technology, Issues and Things. In P. Harvey, E.C. Casella, G. Evans, H. Knox, C. McLean, E.B. Silva, & K. Woodward (Eds.), Objects and Materials: A Routledge Companion (pp. 260–271). London: Routledge.

Mattozzi, A. (2010). The Semiotic Analysis of Objects: A Model. In S. Vihma (Ed.), Design Semiotics in Use (pp. 40–69). Helsinki: Aalto University Press.

Mol, A. (2010). Actor-Network Theory: Sensitive Terms and Enduring Tensions. Kölner Zeitschrift Für Soziologie Und Sozialpsychologie. Sonderheft, 50. (Retrieved from http://dare.uva.nl/search?identifier=75bbc661-0a89-475a-9eef-8c8c5a2e9904 Last visited on 10 February 2019)

Nicolini, D., Mengis, J., & Swan, J. (2012). Understanding the Role of Objects in Cross-Disciplinary Collaboration. Organization Science, 23(3), 612–629. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1110.0664

Norman, D. (2007). Emotional Design: Why We Love (or Hate) Everyday Things. London: Hachette UK.

Parolin, L.L., & Mattozzi, A. (2014). «Come Meglio Credi». Conoscenza Tacita e Innovazione nel Distretto del Legno-Arredo della Brianza. Polis, 25(3). https://doi.org/10.1424/78338

Orlikowski, W.J. (2000). Using Technology and Constituting Structures: A Practice Lens for Studying Technology in Organizations. Organization Science, 11(4), 404–428. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.11.4.404.14600

Russo, B. & De Moraes, A. (2003). The Lack of Usability in Design Icons: An Affective Case Study about Juicy Salif. In B. Hanington, & J. Forlizzi (Eds.), Proceedings of the DPP/o3 (pp. 146–147). New York: ACM Press. https://doi.org/10.1145/782896.782936

de Saussure F. (1959). Course in General Linguistics. New York: Philosophical Library. (Original work published 1916)

Schäfer, H. (2017). Relationality and Heterogeneity: Transitive Methodology in Practice Theory and Actor-Network Theory. In M. Jonas, B. Littig, & A. Wroblewski (Eds.), Methodological Reflections on Practice Oriented Theories (pp. 35–46). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-52897-7_3

Schatzki, T.R. (2002). The Site of the Social: A Philosophical Account of the Constitution of Social Life and Change. University Park, Pa: The Pennsylvania State University Press.

Sewell, W.H. (1992). A Theory of Structure: Duality, Agency, and Transformation. American Journal of Sociology, 98(1), 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1086/229967

Shove, E., & Pantzar, M. (2005). Consumers, Producers and Practices: Understanding the Invention and Reinvention of Nordic Walking. Journal of Consumer Culture, 5(1), 43–64. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469540505049846

Shove, E., Pantzar, M., & Watson, M. (2012). The Dynamics of Social Practice: Everyday Life and how it Changes. Los Angeles: SAGE.

Shove, E., Watson, M., Hand, M., & Ingram J. (2007). The Design of Everyday Life. New York, NY: Berg.

Silverstone, R. & Haddon, L. (1996). Design and the Domestication of Information and Communication Technologies: Technical Change and Everyday Life. In R. Mansell & R. Silverstone (Eds.), Communication by Design: The Politics of Information and Communication Technologies (pp. 44–74). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Silverstone, R., Hirsch, E., & Morley, D. (1992). Information and Communication Technologies and the Moral Economy of the Household. In R. Silverstone, & E. Hirsch (Eds.), Consuming Technologies: Media and Information in Domestic Spaces (pp. 115–131). London: Routledge.

Truninger, M. (2011). Cooking with Bimby in a Moment of Recruitment: Exploring Conventions and Practice Perspectives. Journal of Consumer Culture, 11(1), 37–59. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469540510391221

Warde, A. (2005). Consumption and Theories of Practice. Journal of Consumer Culture, 5(2), 131–153. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469540505053090

Warde, A. (2014). After Taste: Culture, Consumption and Theories of Practice. Journal of Consumer Culture, 14(3), 279–303. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469540514547828

Whittington, R. (1992). Putting Giddens into Action: Social Systems and Managerial Agency. Journal of Management Studies, 29(6), 693–712. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.1992.tb00685.x

Woolgar, S. (1991). Configuring the User: The Case of Usability Trials. In J. Law (Ed.), Sociology of Monsters. Essays on Power Technology and Domination (pp. 58–102). London: Routledge.

Cycles of Dispositions–Unfoldings. A Retro-ANT View of Practices

Authors

DOI:

Keywords:

Abstract

References

Downloads

Published

How to Cite

Issue

Section

License

Information

Make a Submission

Current Issue