The Levels of Critique. Pierre Bourdieu and the Political Potential of Social Theory
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.6092/issn.1971-8853/9753Keywords:
Bourdieu, Cognitive Struggle, Critique, Social Theory, UnspeakabilityAbstract
This article centres on Pierre Bourdieu’s conception of social critique and its political potential. It first examines important objections to his view of the way in which critique works, particularly from those scholars who claim that it implies an objectivist notion of people’s cognition and agency. It continues by clarifying that this objection rests on a misplaced understanding of Bourdieu’s idea of the levels at which critique takes place. It then explores his understanding of the semantic struggle that social critique requires and what it takes to change the dominant configuration of the social. The analysis finally claims that this conception of critique, although far from objectivism, still retains an intellectualist inclination.References
Adkins, L., & Skeggs, B. (Eds.). (2004). Feminism after Bourdieu. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
Berard, T. J. (2005). Rethinking Practices and Structures. Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 35(2), 196–230. https://doi.org/10.1177/0048393105275290
Boltanski, L. (2011). On Critique. A Sociology of Emancipation. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Bourdieu, P. (1977). Outline of a Theory of Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511812507
Bourdieu, P. (1985). The Social Space and the Genesis of Groups. Theory and Society, 14(6), 723–744. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00174048
Bourdieu, P. (1989). Social Space and Symbolic Power. Sociological Theory, 7(1), 14–25. https://doi.org/10.2307/202060
Bourdieu, P. (1990a). The Logic of Practice. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Bourdieu, P. (1990b). In Other Words. Essays Towards a Reflexive Sociology. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Bourdieu, P. (1990c). The Scholastic Point of View. Cultural Anthropology, 5(4), 380–391. https://doi.org/10.1525/can.1990.5.4.02a00030
Bourdieu, P. (1991). Language and Symbolic Power. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Bourdieu, P. (1993). Concluding Remarks: For a Sociogenetic Understanding of Intellectual Works. In C. Calhoun, E. LiPuma, & M. Postone (Eds.), Bourdieu: Critical Perspectives (pp. 263-275). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Bourdieu, P. (2001). Masculine Domination. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Bourdieu, P. (2003). Participant Objectivation. The Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 9(2), 281–294. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9655.00150
Bourdieu, P. (2004). Science of Science and Reflexivity. Chicago & Cambridge: The University of Chicago Press & Polity Press.
Butler, J. (1999). Performativity’s Social Magic. In R. Shusterman (Ed.), Bourdieu: A Critical Reader (pp. 113–128). Oxford: Blackwell.
Callewaert, S. (2006). Bourdieu, Critic of Foucault: The Case of Empirical Social Science against Double-Game-Philosophy. Theory, Culture & Society, 23(6), 73–98. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276406069776
Cooper, D. (2014). Everyday Utopias: The Conceptual Life of Promising Spaces. Durham and London: Duke University Press. https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822377153
Croce, M. (2015a). Homonormative Dynamics and the Subversion of Culture. European Journal of Social Theory, 18(1), 3–20. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368431014534349
Croce, M. (2015b). The Habitus and the Critique of the Present. A Wittgensteinian Reading of Bourdieu’s Social Theory. Sociological Theory, 33(4), 327–346. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735275115617801
Croce, M. (2017a). Etnografia della Contingenza: Postcritica come Ricerca delle Connessioni. Politica e Società, 1, 81–106. https://doi.org/10.4476/86801
Croce, M. (2017b). Postcritica: Oltre l’Attore Niente. Iride, 2, 323–342. https://doi.org/10.1414/87770
Croce, M. (2018). From Gay Liberation to Marriage Equality: A Political Lesson to Be Learnt. European Journal of Political Theory, 17(3), 280–299. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474885115581425
Croce, M. (2019). Postcritica. Asignificanza, Materia, Affetti. Macerata: Quodlibet.
De Sutter, L. (Ed.). (2019). Postcritique. Paris: PUF.
Felski, R. (2015). The Limits of Critique. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226294179.001.0001
Gorski, P. S. (Ed.). (2013). Bourdieu and Historical Analysis. Durham, NC: Duke University Press. https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822395430
Hacking, I. (1999). The Social Construction of What? Cambridge, MA & London: Harvard University Press.
King, A. (2000). Thinking with Bourdieu against Bourdieu: A “Practical” Critique of the Habitus. Sociological Theory, 18(3), 417–433. https://doi.org/10.1111/0735-2751.00109
Kenny, A. (2007). Verification Principle and the Private Language Argument. In M. Williams (Ed.), Wittgenstein’s Philosophical Investigations: Critical Essays (pp. 131–153). Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
Lane, J. F. (2006). Bourdieu’s Politics. Problems and Possibilities. Abingdon: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203013571
Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the Social. An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Lawler, S. (2004). Rules of Engagement: Habitus, Power and Resistance. In L. Adkins & B. Skeggs (Eds.), Feminism after Bourdieu (Special Issue: Sociological Review Monograph Series) (pp. 110–128). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-954X.2005.00527.x
Martin, J. L. (2003). What is Field Theory? American Journal of Sociology, 109(1), 1–49. https://doi.org/10.1086/375201
Van den Berg, A. (1998). Is Sociological Theory Too Grand for Social Mechanisms? In P. Hedström & R. Swedberg (Eds.), Social Mechanisms: An Analytical Approach to Social Theory (pp. 204-237). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511663901.009
Wacquant, L. (2013). Symbolic Power and Group-Making: On Pierre Bourdieu’s Reframing of Class. Journal of Classical Sociology, 13(2), 274–291. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468795X12468737
Wittgenstein, L. (2009). Philosophical Investigations (4th Ed.), edited by P. M. S. Hacker & J. Schulte. Oxford: Blackwell.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2019 Mariano Croce
The copyrights of all the texts on this journal belong to the respective authors without restrictions.
This journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (full legal code).
See also our Open Access Policy.
